You will be redirected back to your article in seconds
Back to IndieWire

Weekend Box Office: $56 Million ‘First Class’ Opening Isn’t X-actly What Fox Had In Mind

Weekend Box Office: $56 Million 'First Class' Opening Isn't X-actly What Fox Had In Mind

As the only major opening of the week, it was not a surprise to see “X-Men: First Class” reign with a $56 million total. For those keeping track at home (why are you doing this?), this is the lowest-scoring opening weekend for any of the four films in the “X-Men” series save for the eleven-year old first entry, and not a particularly impressive start for the only new wide release in town. This isn’t even taking into account a summer that has seen the fifth and fourth installments of the “Fast And The Furious” and “Pirates Of The Caribbean” achieve great success.

There’s a reason for this comparatively tepid bow, and it has to do with a damaged brand. The myth that people won’t see movies if they are of poor quality is ludicrous — it’s more about the consistency of the brand that attracts and repels audiences. After all, if word gets out that the new “Twilight” film is almost unwatchable bad, the film will still generate robust box office receipts from its base. Audiences have been burned by the X-franchise twice now, and while a massive opening was enough to make “X-Men: The Last Stand” the biggest film in the series, by weekend two part three was registering massive drops. That diminished reputation carried on to “X-Men Origins: Wolverine,” one of the most incompetent blockbusters in recent memory, and one that generated only somewhat satisfying returns for Fox, still gunshy regarding “Wolverine 2.”

What Fox was trying to do was relaunch a maligned brand name not only with an unfamiliar period setting (the 1960s) but also without the meal ticket that is Hugh Jackman, opting instead for ads spotlighting the interplay between James McAvoy (already a number of years removed from “Wanted”) and Michael Fassbender (who?). In a 3D summer, putting out this alien product, one that replaced popular characters like Cyclops and Storm with the likes of Banshee and Havok, represented a huge risk. Considering Fox did not exactly break the bank on this (the “official” budget of $120 million is significantly lower than the last three films in this series), all the studio has to do is hope/wait that international numbers come on strong.

Fox is in an intriguing position with this franchise. With this opening, they have to hope that word-of-mouth carries, as the X-films have all fallen off heavily after big debuts. But if “First Class” is the weakest performer of the bunch, do they motor on with a “Second Class”? Will the fire ignite for a direct sequel to “The Last Stand,” an idea that has been bandied about in the Fox offices? Or will they kick the tires on allowing the property to lapse back to Marvel and Disney? While Fox is in the same position with the “Fantastic Four” franchise, they remain stuck in development on “Fantastic Four Reborn,” and it’s easy to see that brand bouncing over to the Mouse House if Fox doesn’t show initiative. The fact that they hired David Slade to helm another “Daredevil” suggests the studio is keen on keeping these potentially-lucrative comic brands in-house, but “X-Men” is by far the costliest. Even if they make a theatrical profit on “First Class” (likely), they have to hope fan appreciation for this latest installment hasn’t yet peaked. And you’ll have to ask the lawyers about this, but is it possible Disney ends up with the “X-Men” property but the rights to “Wolverine” remain at Fox? Because continuing to make “X-Men” pictures without ever being able to use Hugh Jackman is a game no executive wants to play.

As expected, that second weekend fall for “The Hangover Part II” was precipitous (62%). Chalk it up to last weekend’s holiday frame, or the fact that the movie isn’t very good, or a traditional sequel’s performance involving a massive second frame drop. There’s really no news to report on the blockbuster sequel, which should cross $200 million domestic by mid-week. Matching the first film’s domestic take remains somewhat in doubt, but the international haul should be heftier this time around. “The Hangover Part III”? “The Hangover Part III” it is. And then maybe “Lil’ Hangover” for the kids.

Despite being the only kiddie picture on the market, the second weekend drop for “Kung Fu Panda 2” was disconcerting. Marketing screwed this movie, as a confused campaign never really sold the story to those who would be curious about further adventures in this series. Hell, they couldn’t even get the title right, with “The Kaboom of Doom” registering as a subtitle for some, a tagline for others. It’s the only big kiddie attraction until “Cars 2.” which means Dreamworks has a golden opportunity on their hands, but it could already be squandered with this disappointing frame. The hope for the studio is that they’ll be saved by international audiences, as, in stark contrast to the American market, the animated sequel is actually breaking records in a number of regions.

While the domestic take is largely irrelevant in the bigger picture, Disney should be pleased with “Pirates Of The Caribbean 4” fast approaching $200 million stateside. The film should pass $800 million worldwide soon, which is less than the last two films in the series, but more than enough to keep this money train running. And speaking of money trains, Judd Apatow’s Midas Touch may have returned, as “Bridesmaids” sailed well past the $100 million domestic tag. The film was being downgraded as a likely $60 million performer tops, so crossing nine figures definitely raises a few eyebrows in Hollywood. Weirdly, though, star and co-writer Kristen Wiig only has “Friends With Kids” lined up as a follow-up, a picture that actually reunites most of the “Bridesmaids” cast.

Thor” and “Fast Five” are both wrapping up their runs, with the Marvel hero likely stalling out before he can hit $180 million domestic, and “Fast Five” collecting all the gravy having surpassed $200 million stateside. “Fast Six” is coming. “Thor 2,” maybe not so soon, as a $500 million global tally is looking less likely. Both films narrowly outgrossed “Midnight In Paris,” which continues a slow expansion despite very strong per-theater numbers, it’s $19k-average the best in the top ten this weekend.

Again collecting the best per-screen average of the weekend was “Tree Of Life,” which grabbed $31k for each of its twenty engagements for a $621k gross. It led the way for a promising group of newcomers, including “Beginners,” which tallied $135k on five screens, followed by the somewhat quieter $40k four-screen engagement for “Submarine.” Nature doc “The Last Mountain” averaged a solid $8k on two screens for a $17k total, while “Beautiful Boy” nabbed $16k at four locations. Social change docs “Women, Art, Revolution” and “Building Hope” had more low-profile debuts with $6.4k and $3.5k on two and one screen bookings, while “Film Socialisme” played to $4.5k worth of confused audience-goers at New York City’s IFC Center. Support your local arthouse theater, boys and girls.

1. X-Men: This Time, We Mean It (Fox) – $56 million
2. The Hangover Part II: The Quickening (Warner Bros.) – $32.4 million ($187 mil.)
3. Kung Fu Panda 2: The Daboom Of Koom (Paramount/Dreamworks) – $24.3 million ($100 mil.)
4. Pirates Of The Caribbean: Autopilot Edition (Disney) – $18 million ($190 mil.)
5. Bridesmaids (Universal) – $12.1 million ($107 mil.)
6. Thor (Paramount) – $4.2 million ($169 mil.)
7. The Fast But Moderately Pleasant And Well-Adjusted Five (Universal) – $3.2 million ($202 mil.)
8. Midnight In Paris (Sony) – $2.9 million ($6.9 mil.)
9. Jumping The Broom (Sony/TriStar) – $865k ($36 million)
10. Something Borrowed (Warner Bros.) – $835k ($36 million)

This Article is related to: Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,



Michael Fassbender is not a star. He’s a very great actor and quickly gaining recognition, but he is not yet a star and you can’t sell a movie on him.

You people don’t seem to understand the “Who?” part of this article. It wasn’t said writer calling out Fassbender, but acting as a voice for the casual movie going crowd that makes up a large majority of the audience..


Also…in regards to Michael Fassbender… he will be huge. And if he’s not, then something has gone horribly wrong – because he is terrific.


January Jones can’t act! Let’s not pretend otherwise, people…quit giving her excuses due to the size of her breasts and face the facts. Sheesh!


are you frickin kidding me? Michael Fassbender who? He’s gonna be a huge star in the near future, Roger Ebert earmarked him as a replacement for Daniel Craig as James Bond for f**k sake. And I for one see him as an amazing 007, come on Fassbender was great in Inglorious Basterds also


Nobody but movie geeks know who Fassbender is. That is not calling him worthless garbage. Calm yourself. It just means that he can’t sell a film and the general public has no impression of him. Maybe AFTER he becomes Bond he can sell a movie, but saying that “someday he may become Bond” doesn’t sell squat in the here and now.


There are a few things to note about this X-Men.

1) Michael Fassbender is a star.

2) The era has been parodied beautifully by Austin Powers but doesn’t work here dramatically.

3) Kevin Bacon was embarrassing.


@Roy Fast Five wasn’t bad, did well but I don’t really need to see Fast Six. Then again I didn’t need to see Fast Five either. But I did. And I liked it.


“Kung Fu Panda 2: The Daboom Of Koom”



For all the studio BS about X-Men performing to expectations or otherwise, it’s worth bearing in mind the upside of what Fox is doing. By signing up a cast of relative unknowns – probably with options for forthcoming instalments – they leave the door open to doing a new series of films without someone like Hugh Jackman and co taking a heavy back-end position. So even if this first film is a disappointment relative to the previous four, it actually represents a much more secure financial footing for the series going forwards.

The fly in the ointment, one suspects, is that Matthew Vaughan’s shoot had all the hallmarks of being a runaway production – which probably means a much bigger budget than the one they signed up for..

Gabe Toro

I didn’t mean to imply there was anything greater than a 1% chance that Fox would let Disney ever have the X-Men franchise like that. Fox has done dumber things, but not that much dumber. That said, contractually, it remains a possibility.


That, and X-Men wasn’t very good. It was a laughably cheesy insider’s insider movie. Everybody I saw the movie with walked out asking: “Why did we have to see all that origin stuff again? We already know it.”

Edward Davis

@Roy, seriously, right?

@Gabe, good piece, but I don’t know where you’re going with this Disney stuff at all. Fox is never going to hand over their lucrative franchises to Disney. Disney COULD buy them back for a couple billion dollars like they did with the Marvel films and Paramount, but your piece SEEMS — i’ll give you the benefit of the doubt — to suggest that if Fox doesn’t know what to do with them or how to develop them, they’ll just go, “aww shucks, we can’t figure em out,” and hand the brands over which is of course absurd. I hope that’s not what you’re saying and if so, stop doing bong hits before writing up the B.O. report.

Look what Columbia did with Ghost Rider 2, they rushed it into production because rights were going to lapse. They’d rather have a shitty film on screen and keep the brand going then roll over and just let rights lapse back to Marvel.

Same thing with D.C. and Superman. The second they got a half-decent pitch by Chris Nolan they basically green lit the Zack Snyder Superman film cause rights revert back soon.

Other things to note about First Class. Yes, you’re pretty much dead on about its domestic take, but note, it made $64M overseas.

And you’ll probably laugh at this tweet from Fox.!/20thFoxCC/status/77440228490625024


So when it comes to big/loud summer blockbusters, the two lousy sequels – Pirates, Hangover 2 – make a fortune and the two that were genuinely good – X-Men, Panda – struggle?

Damn you, fellow moviegoers!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *