You will be redirected back to your article in seconds
Back to IndieWire

“The Strange Thing About The Johnsons” Director Ari Aster Talks To Shadow & Act About His Provocative & Controversial Short Film

"The Strange Thing About The Johnsons" Director Ari Aster Talks To Shadow & Act About His Provocative & Controversial Short Film

A little over a week ago, Shadow and Act introduced many readers to a short film that had the internet abuzz with all types of mixed emotions.  It seemed that most who viewed director Ari Aster’s The Strange Thing About The Johnsons had a strong reaction to it, and a personal opinion regarding the film’s meaning.  Well, S&A reached out to Aster and he has provided answers to a lot of the questions our readers had about his film.

S&A: Where did the concept for your film originate?

Ari Aster: It was actually an idea that sprouted between me and a few friends (one of whom plays the son in the Johnsons) the summer before my first year at AFI. We were talking about topics that are too taboo to be explored, and so we arrived at taboos that weren’t even taboos because they were so unfathomable, and the most popular was that of a son molesting his father. “That should never be made into a film!” So, it began on that level, but from there it evolved into something very different.

What led you to decide on using an all-black cast?  Was it a gimmick, complete colorblind casting, or an impromptu decision, maybe?

The actor who plays the son is a close friend who’s starred in most of my films (including all of my pre-AFI student work) and he was there from the film’s conception. I cast him because he was right for the role and I wanted to work with him. At that point it was obvious that we were casting African Americans. The color of the Johnson family’s skin is totally incidental. It’s of no consequence to the story or its execution.

Did the casting of black actors in a film with such a provocative theme lead to any reservations about going forward with the project?

Not really. Again, the color of the family isn’t important. We certainly assumed that casting black actors in a film that tackles such transgressive themes would create something of a stir, and it would be a lie to say that we weren’t hesitant, especially as many people were advising us against the decision. But the longer the dialogue continued about whether it was okay to cast the way we wanted to (without making a discernible statement on race), the more exciting that argument became. There is no intended commentary on the black experience and I would never claim to have any insight into that.

Were there any concerns on your part regarding how viewers would perceive the film?

Were we concerned? Not really. Were we aware that this would be polarizing? Of course. We anticipated some backlash, especially in the beginning (when the idea was still fresh to us), but I lived with this premise for so long that I basically forgot how disturbing it was. Once we committed to the project, the challenge wasn’t to find new ways of keeping it shocking or outrageous for 30 minutes; it was to tell the story as dramatically as we could, and to keep true to our original intentions without overstepping our own boundaries of taste. We also had to fight to raise the budget ourselves, so convincing people to donate money to this “role-reversing incest whatsit” was more difficult than releasing it to an anonymous group of people.
I also have to say that we were on our festival run and the movie was unexpectedly leaked onto the internet, which caught us completely off-guard.

Did the actors in your film have any reservations about any aspects of your film?

No. They had questions when they first came onto the project – many of them were the same questions that I’m answering here – but they were all totally on board. I think the actors saw it as an opportunity to play something different. If the film works, it’s because of their commitment.

There has been much debate on our site, and all over the Internet, about the meaning and intent of your film; can you explain whether The Strange Thing About The Johnsons was intended to be humorous or dramatic?

Why not both? I see the film as a satire of the domestic melodrama (a la Douglas Sirk or Nicholas Ray), so it draws more from movie cliches and genre tropes, especially from films dealing with abuse or family dysfunction, than it does real life. But it was a challenge for us (and something that we always kept in mind) to transcend the absurdity of the premise and to actually consider the implications of such a thing. In a lot ways the film serves as a nightmarish cautionary tale on liberal parenting, a sort of worst-case scenario for a father who’s granted his son too much freedom and respect, but there’s also the suggestion of culpability on the father’s part, so the film skips a lot of the causes and focuses primarily on the effects of an insidious, inverted dynamic.

In the end, we just wanted to make a film that was compelling, visceral and unique.

This Article is related to: News and tagged ,



I feel as though economic status played an integral role in this film. An affluent black family whose patriarch is an emotionally sensitive poet so disempowered by his spoiled son that he will not refuse the sons sexual advances? This story illustrates how perversity and depravity tend to become stranger and stranger depending on class status, or at least that is how it read to me. Mainly because, as we have seen statistically, most reported serial killers are middle class white men (crimes that fulfill a personal desire), whereas most black prisoners tend to engage in crimes of survival (maybe illegal but definitely pragmatic). So by removing the need to survive, implementing the concept of a living a leisurely life and maintaining that atrocities occur regardless of social standing, a film maker has to become innovative regarding what atrocity he chooses to explore. If the father had been physically or sexually abusive to his son, we would walk away bored, commenting "oh another lame movie about violent black patriarchal men". This way, the plot leaves us completely dumb founded and probably a little upset – but that's the point… Good art seeks to evoke visceral emotion. That's not to say we can't make positive black narratives, but subversive stories should also be values for their content even if it makes us angry. For people who have experienced trauma, films like this can be extremely cathartic as they refuse to keep such matters private and provide survivors with a sense that they are not alone in the world. If you want to pretend that horrible things don't happen in the world I have no idea why you'd turn this on.

    Yolanda Mannie

    You are absolutely correct! I am African American and I live a predominately black community. All I’ve heard today is that this is a disgusting film, it’s stupid or it doesn’t make sense. Well I watched it and it pulled emotions out of me that I didn’t even know I had! It was scary watching this movie. After reading the director reasoning and his prospective I understood the point of view. I look forward to more of his work. Your point of view is definitely on POINT!

      Sakia Johnson

      I think you are missing the point of this movie. It has nothing to do with race, you could have filled the cast with any ethnicity and still conveyed the same point. My point bieng, if the Johnsons were white or asian etc, would you not be just as moved by it?The director himself said the race of the cast is irrelevant, he just happened to work with the actor who plays the son soo the Johnsons bieng black was created.


I was rather offended by this film "The Strange Thing About The Johnsons." By the end of it I had to conclude that this film should have been titled "The Strange Thing About The Mind of Ari Aster." For Aster to show Black characters in such a helpless pathological light only furthers stereotypes and ideas about men and families being pathological because they are Black. Based on this interview, I know that Aster does not believe this, but for him to say that "the color of the family is not important" shows his insensitivity to the historic ways films in America has been meant to support ideas of white superiority and Black inferiority since the original and still most commercially successful film, "Birth of A Nation." Unfortunately the most successful films in the film industry are those that pathologize Black men like The Color Purple did with Mister, like Waiting to Exhale did with cheating husbands; like Precious did with the father of Precious. I feel that Aster is following this very unfortunate path of showing villainous pathological Black men in order to be "pathbreaking" or "popular" which is just a cover I think for going with the flow of advancing white supremacy. Aster had to give more agency to the father in owning up to his role in his son's sexuality, rather than showing him as a helpless victim to his son's advances. This film was being provocative just for the thrill of it, rather than dealing in a realistic meaningful way with incest. -RF,

    Truth to Power

    Props to poster Rhones. To poster Gigi Young, if the consequence of being “friends” with a white filmmaker is something like this, we don’t need to/nor should be “friends” with them.


Nightmarish, my thoughts exactly. I like how the camera conveyed that far fetched, nightmarish dynamic. Like when the father was going down the stares and the son began to confront him. During the whole dialogue you could not see the son. All you saw was the dim lit living room and the nervous body language of the father. It was like the son was the boogie man, you could not see him but you could feel his menacing presence………..that was brilliant camera work. Or how the camera winded down the stares in this dizzy dream like fashion. Again the lighting was awesome. I love it when films frame every scene like an artistic photograph. As for the movie being a comedy or drama……………I agree with the director when he says, why not both. I have experienced enough sadness in my life to understand that there is a A LOT of comedy in tragedy. Our emotions are complex. So I like the complexity of having something horrific juxtaposed with this whimsical, all American, prosperous setting. That is the best kind of art.


before like for you perfectionists


incredibly awsome never seen anything like it befor. If you continue to do work lik Cocoon Man you will have no problems taboos NEED TO BE BROKEN! This is going on right NOW in every walk of life.


This film is a disaster

Kato Cooks

The film is disturbing, provocative and remarkable. I particularly enjoyed the nuanced performance of the mother during the bathtub scene. It worked and without explicit, graphic images to cheat the imagination. Kudos to everyone involved.

I didn't see the film as a statement on one ethnic group or another, just a film that featured a black cast. I see, from the interview, that I was correct. I'm eager for your next venture. I involve myself in these projects through Kickstarter (in post-production on Steve Nguyen's Hibakusha presently), typically, but please take my email address for anything else remotely similar to this one.




Inadvertently, the choice of a black family made me pay attention to the subject matter more. I am a black woman, and this is not the type of abuse or depravity you hear about in the black world, though you would not be surprised if your white friend next door was abusing his white father. One would probably shake his/her head and go, "White people are into all KINDS of crazy shyt!"

But when an unknown type of depravity is portrayed by a race that is not necessarily known for this type of thing, it highlights the depraved actions more. I didn't think about race too many times during the movie. I thought about it when the bad weaves popped up. I thought to myself, "they couldn't find another wig for the cute lil girl? Lawd!" or "That mama is not old enough for this ugly looking grey wig" But that is when I thought about it.

The subject matter itself didn't make me think about race at all except to think that choosing a black lead probably dictated a black family. If he would have gotten all creative and tried to equalize the race effect by having a black daddy, a white mama, a hispanic wife, a chinese in-law, and so forth, I think that would have been totally authentic and detracted from the disturbing subject matter.

And the point WAS to disturb the hell out of us. I think satire is a bit too sweet of a word to use alone in describing this short. I and thinking more along the lines of 'depraved nightmarish satire'. :/


Who are you guys the Thought Police?


finally got to stay up longer than my son and got to watch this film. Well I was disturbed, but mostly really sad. It's an ingenious idea for a filmmaker to turn something like (the run of he mill) incest on head, but a complete cop out for a Jewish boy not to bring it in closer to home. Now that would have been powerful, commendable, got loads more column inches and showed him to be a film maker with guts and vim! But no he had to join the long line of filmmakers who in a single film get to prove themselves to be non betrayers, by making negative films about black people and insuring that they get money to make a feature. It's a way for a filmmaker to say. 'Hey money guys, look! I will never rock the boat. I'll just keep heaping out the same old, same old, with SOME good lighting and interesting shots' The audience needs to become sophisticated to these kinds of people.

Jennifer Edwards

I would like to have a part in one of Ari Aster films


for ava


Read the last sentence of the Interview. It is clear that he did want to say anything with the film. If he did that would have been part of this interview. I would say this is a great amazing fantastic stepping stone for any film maker/film crew member. Eventually though, people are going to want something that is more than a good fuck. I wouldn't watch this again. And I would reccomend it to someone if they were bored and needed some time to kill.

Bklyn Negress

I thought the film was very well done. I liked it and I will tell others.

For the past week or so, I've been reading the blogosphere chatter about this film and, I've decided one thing we can do to reduce negative stereotypes about black folks is to monitor the comments section on blogs that target the black community. I'm not talking about the typical moderating to ensure commenters are respecting community rules, I think there needs to be an real intervention—Drop Squad style


A truly visionary student film — there's no debating that.

Darla & Mark

He looks like a serial killer.

Bani Productions

1) I liked the movie.

2) There is perversion in all communities and all races. No topic is exclusive to any one race.

3) Those upset would not have been if the cast was all white because they are probably used to depravity being portrayed by white characters and regular violent crimes of necessity (drugs, gangs, turf wars, African political unrest etc) portrayed by blacks.

4) If we demand diversity in creative projects in the media, we have to also accept diversity in stories. Black people are not perfect people and neither is any race in the world. There is complexity, variety and depth to who we are and what we do. And if you are not ready for that, stick to fairy tales where the bad are very bad and the good are stupidly so. Me, I think Goldilocks deserved to get her trespassing behind seriously whooped.

5)This is in no way in the same category as Tyler Perry.


I started out laughing , I thought it was a comedy. Then it all started to shift and by the end, it was just sad. It makes you think, who was the original aggressor and how complicit was the dad. It was a very disturbing movie overall. I think the story could have been expanded slightly to show what happened Prom night, maybe a flash back as the mom was talking to add context. The acting, directing and cinematography were all top notch. In light of all the allegations coming out about collegiate sports coaches, I found this a dark strange twist on abuse.


The acting, directing and cinematography in this film are well executed, but the writing is just as weak and illogical as the Tyler Perry films that Shadow and Act constantly bashes. I am of the opinion that it's exploitative and irresponsible to make light of the subject matter of abuse. What the viewer gains by the end of the film is equal to what one gains after viewing an episode of The Jerry Springer Show – mild but ultimately empty entertainment. The people who think this is great art must also be of the opinion that episodes of The Bold and the Beautiful should be on a 24/7 loop on millions of screens in The Louvre.


Very interesting film. Disturbing and shocking but also surprising. And the performances were riveting.


This film reminds me very much of Antichrist in that the tone and story is so utterly horrific that you find yourself hoping wishing thinking that perhaps it is a joke – then you feel sick and offended that perhaps it is.
I was deeply bothered though moved by the performances especially Angela Bullock who exercised a beautiful restraint throughout which is not commonly seen.
I accept Asters responses in general – the film is ahead of it's time in a sense- it is still painful to see a black family in this light even if these complexities do exist behind closed doors.
I do believe Aster underestimated the weight of this but as an artist I don't believe it was for him to water it down or second guess.

Fitnah Free

Are you fucking serious? This is maddening. How does anyone see this as a comedy? Yes its disturbing and yes i see the artists trying extra hard to made depravity art. but if anyone thinks its comedic you are a lunatic.


Buy or sell? Well… I am buying his explanations. As he said, he had worked with the "son" who is his friend, so it's natural that the entire cast would be black. Also, did he expect any "controversy" and "push-back"? Well, it's safe to say that if lived in America he most assuredly knew controversy would visit him. I am also buying his take on the subject matter being colorblind. On a side note, Emmanuel, your posts and style of posting are much appreciated.


Thanks to Emmanuel and Ari for allowing us some insight. I like that Ari made the core of the film a real issue, liberal parenting, which is color blind and I'm sure some will disagree.

@Gigi Young
Agree with you on that point about white filmmakers leaning towards color blind casting/crewing only if it's a "friend". Not always the case, but it's certainly seems so. I've fortunately experience both ends of the spectrum.


Well, I saw what Mr. Aster was trying to accomplish with the film and I enjoyed it. Disturbing but better made than comedies disguised as dramas…like Precious. I would love to hear from the cast as well. Great job, Emmanuel!

Gigi Young

Thanks for this!

This (and to a same extent, the ABG web series and McQueen/Fassbender collabo) proves that black folks need to be buddies with non-black filmmakers, writers, producers, etc. Folks, regardless of race, work with their friends (Judd Apatow!), and if the up-and-coming white movie makers don't have any black friends, they won't ever think to use black folks in major roles, either behind the scenes or in front of the camera.


Huh!!!??? His response was just as wack and empty as Tyler Perry's response on why he cast Kim Kardashian. Please let this man and that intentional, shock for the sake of it, attention seeking, demonic film drift off into obscurity!!! :-( Anyone that doesn't believe this man premeditated the attention he is garnering by making this lurid shock fest, I got a Brooklyn Bridge to sell you!

Sharon Ham

I thought it was an absolutely brilliant short film! We as a people would support a whole bunch of made up nonsense,but when someone thinks outside of the box and brings you a “What if?” you start to criticize their brilliant minds! I do not believe it was about race or ment to offend anyone! It was meant to simply be a work of art from this mans head for your eyes!

Janel Pierce

I had a mix of emotions watching this short as well. I had the initial, “Why did it have to be a black family?” thought. However that was short-lived. I NEVER saw this as a comedy. I do not see any comedic element to this at all. What I saw this as was the obvious parent/child molestation story turned upside down. I also began to wonder if this could also be how some parental abusers see the situation? I’ve read of cases where the parent accused the child of seducing them. I am wondering if this could have been that viewpoint as well? Where the parent is still the abuser but sees himself as the victim. I also notice how the role of the mother seems to be same regardless of who is the abuser. The mother still remains silent all these years and tries to drown out the rape via the TV. It still makes you angry at the mother for not fighting for the victim while he was still alive. I also wonder if the mother might have thought the father was an equal participant. Maybe not even sure if he initiated it or not. Either way she saw it, she is still just as guilty for not doing something to stop it. That always makes me angry in cases of abuse when a parent knows and remains silent.


the movie was trash and the black cast was a gimmick. i find it very offensive that if he chose as a white writer to delve into such a disgusting topic that he wouldnt chose a white cast. if his black friend was in other films he couldve not been in this film. i think it was purposely done bc it is a degrading topic and he wouldnt want to degrade white ppl to do the film. black ppl have enough negative sterotypes so to emasculate the head of the household in this movie the black man. is wrong. i grew up with a great black dad no incest great mom and dad and sibling. but rarely are there any reflection of a functional black family. theres not enough films out there that feature black families so to use a black cast for this is wrong. pathetic and i will never support his work or universal that produced such trash. also as a creative writer myself, i can say the movie had no purpose there was nothing in it but the lame shock value of howard stern. shock for the sake of shock not even well done. no next time white trash when you do a trashy movie cast your own ppl fool.


This is why this country is so twisted.


In the strange things about the Johnsons what mental illness did the son have

Your Nightmares

This film is trash.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *