You will be redirected back to your article in seconds
Back to IndieWire

James Cameron Says He Wanted To Direct ‘Jurassic Park,’ Would’ve Been Like ‘Aliens’

James Cameron Says He Wanted To Direct 'Jurassic Park,' Would've Been Like 'Aliens'

While we all not-so-anxiously await James Cameron to make his “Avatar” sequels that are becoming less anticipated with each passing moment, the director continues to a seemingly never ending press run. Whether it’s chatting about “Titanic” or whatever latest adventure or cause he’s taking on, it’s never too long before another interview the king of the world director surfaces. But thankfully, his latest little soundbyte has nothing to do with Pandora, but instead about another film helmed by his pal Steven Spielberg.

Chatting with the UK’s Huffington Post, Cameron revealed that at one point he was chasing “Jurassic Park” as something to direct. “I tried to buy the book rights and he beat me to it by a few hours,” he said. And really, thank God for that because as Cameron elaborates, his version would have been darker.

“But when I saw the film, I realised that I was not the right person to make the film, he was. Because he made a dinosaur movie for kids, and mine would have been ‘Aliens‘ with dinosaurs, and that wouldn’t have been fair,” Cameron explained. “Dinosaurs are for 8-year-olds. We can all enjoy it, too, but kids get dinosaurs and they should not have been excluded for that. His sensibility was right for that film, I’d have gone further, nastier, much nastier.”

So, as “Jurassic Park” returns to theaters next summer in 3D just remember that it could’ve been an R-rated ‘Aliens’ style movie directed by James Cameron. And then say a silent thank you to whoever managed to get on the phone first and close the deal for Spielberg before Cameron got there.

This Article is related to: News and tagged ,



I don't mind author commentary in my articles.


I, personally, like the introduction to this. Also, let's look at the unoriginality of James (who did say if they made battleship into a movie he would stop making movies!! :D). His movies are definitely copy cats of everyone else's ideas. His script writing is terrible. He waits until someone else tries something (Ex. The Hobbit's frames per second). The only thing he has going for him is a hot ex-wife…

oscar bellows

Author, please see the comments from Ralph and Eric? I am not saying I am an Avatar apologist or a James Cameron fan-boy, but when you say that Avatar (which made lots of money quite recently) has less-and-less-anticipated sequels, could you explain why you think so? I mean, I am not offended so much as just feeling uninformed. You as a blogger must maybe know more about what is going on than me, so why not share your knowledge and tell the reader WHY the Avatar sequel is constantly less anticipated, rather than just sayin it's so? It seems presumptuous to say we "all" anticipate it less and less when the readers don't even have the first clue why "you" think so, don't you think?


Crichton was meeting with Spielberg about making a TV show (later to be ER developed by Spielberg's friend John Welles) and Spielberg asked what else Crichton was up to he and he said he was writing a book about dinosaurs. Spielberg's told this story a few times and says they completely forget what they were meeting about and spent the entire time talking Jurassic.


I'd love to see Cameron make the movie he would've made but not call it a Jurassic Park. Make it his own dark, violent action packed dinosaur movie.


I disagree with the author here. I for one am still looking forward to the Avatar sequels and I think James Cameron would be perfect for a Jurassic Park reboot, even if he missed out on making it first up.


Wow, I think I would have liked James Cameron's version a lot more. It sounds like it would have been truer to the book, which does have some really dark scenes.


This article sure sounds bitter and biased. lol…. what a waste of space.. although, i do love steven speilbergs movie a ton, the article itself just sucks.


Rated R is the only way to go… Kids should be able to see whatever they want. I di
d when I.was a kid and I am not violent mean cruel or a bum. Ef censorahip

Chad b

The author needs to speak for himself when he says "we are all not-so-anxiously awaiting avatar" instead of the entire media world.

This is the worst article I've read on playlist


JP was fun. Hollow but fun. Cameron would have just made it more intense. And that's why Speilberg should have stepped down for the sequel and let Cameron do his magic. He's proven twice that he excels at sequels.


Admitting that he would if added Aliens to JP when it was not even in the source material ??? It would of sucked. JP reintroduced the summer movie stayed and in theatre for over a year it was amazing as that kid I loved it Spielberg did an amazing job.

Steven B


I'm sure you think you're cute and clever with the "Avatar" bashing, but you merely come across as a childish moron.


Basically he's saying he would've shot the movie like the book. The books was much darker and much nastier. Shame. I would've liked to have seen that version of JP and not the "Disney" version Spielberg made.


Or maybe it's because steven is ten times better than you?


KEVIN JAGERNAUTH blog entries are stepping more and more into Gabe territory. Shame. And though I like Cameron, glad he didn't get his hands on it.


You know, there was a time when James Cameron was an awesome director who made fun, groundbreaking films. He still makes groundbreaking films, but in ways I don't particular care about (3D). I don't know why The Playlist is being so snarky about it acting like Avatar/Titanic-era Cameron would be making Jurassic Park when the movie was being made (and most likely, the rights were being sold) right around when Cameron made The Abyss and Terminator 2. You got something against those movies, then we gonna have a problem!


it took a while for the Playlist to step up out of this snarky writing style; sad to see it return.


I think you misinterpreted his comment. He wouldn't have put aliens in it — it simply would've been ALIENS (the movie) with dinosaurs instead.


So reading that quote, it didn't occur to anyone that he obviously meant his movie "Aliens" with dinosaurs and NOT that was gonna put actual aliens into Jurassic Park?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *