You will be redirected back to your article in seconds
Back to IndieWire

One S & A Reader’s Take After Seeing ‘Django Unchained’

One S & A Reader's Take After Seeing 'Django Unchained'

As I mentioned last week, media and award consideration screenings for Django Unchained start later this week; but there have already been a few advance screenings of the film for specially-invited audiences, one of whom is an LA-based filmmaker whose work weve profiled on this site, and who is also a regular reader of S & A.

He saw the film last night at a screening, with Quentin Tarantino present, and what he says I think is pretty interesting, making me even more excited (as if I wasn’t already) to see the film; here you go:

“I know how anticipated this film is for a lot of Shadow and Act readers…and so I had to share this with you. Just came from a screening of Django. I went in wanting to hate that movie. Based on the script I read back in the summer of 2011 I was not optimistic. This film deals with slavery one of the ugliest atrocities America ever committed. To show too little would make it come off safe like the Help. To show too much would make it come off as being excessive. Like the use of the N-word in most of Tarantino’s films.”

“From the first frame, it is obvious that the film is a homage to spaghetti westerns like The Good The bad and the ugly. Images of African American men in chains is hard to take. It triggered in me, thoughts on just how bad it was for us during that time. The powerlessness, the victimization, the demeaning, all lead you to hating this movie. But you can’t look away. Instead you take this ride with Django.  He transforms from a slave to a free man to a gun slinger and Jamie pulls it off effortlessly.”

“The acting all around was stellar. This all star team of actors definitely showed up. Leonardo did his thing as Candy. I wouldn’t call him a villain, slavery was probably the villain, characters like candy were just men doing business. I guess that’s why it is so impacting. Realizing that it isn’t a personal affront. A black person was no different than a cow or goat.”

“I digress… The character that stands head and shoulders above everyone else is Stevens, played by Sam Jackson. Talk about crabs in a bucket. His character reminded me that some blacks kept blacks down harder than anybody.”

“As westerns go, this film is more action based which makes sense. At 160 minutes its long but it moves unlike the sleep inducing film Lincoln and Order. There are some lighter moments, most I wasn’t laughing at but the audience seemed to get in to. I couldn’t let my guard down enough to enjoy those moments,too busy thinking about what my ancestors dealt with that allowed me to sit here, educated, and able to write this.”

“At its foundation, the film is about a man doing what ever it takes to get his woman. Like I said, I wanted to hate this film but I can’t. It is a solid piece that does not let whites off the hook. I saw it in an audience of 95% white and they seemed to have realized just how fucked up slavery was. During the q and a after, Tarantino admitted how fucked up.slavery was and how it still affects this country.”

“it’s a polarizing film that isn’t for everybody. Based on the discussions thus far, the film will trigger even more discussion. Tarantino said that there are thousands of great stories to tell from that era and hopes this will lead to more. I don’t know if I want to see too many films dealing with slavery but with Django, black folks will have someone to root for, that is a straight up bad ass.”

So does his review change the minds for anyone who had any doubts, or are they still there?

This Article is related to: Reviews and tagged



Tarantino is another delusional white guy who either hates himself because he is white or thinks he is a savior of the black man by his bold (and ignorant) anti-white sentiments. Bigots are the same no matter what their skin color. Tarantinos movies just get worse the more he tries to push his lame agenda. Don't waste your money on Django. Jamie Foxx sucks anyway.

James Nelson

I've been curiously watching the course of Django since it was first announced. I was and am curious as to how audiences are going to react to it. If one infrequent surfs the net looking for articles on the state of Black filmmakers and stories about Black characters, where people voice their dissatisfaction at how Hollywood handles race. You will see lots of ire from white filmgoers saying that "race of characters don't matter", that we're only 17% of the population so why would we expect to have more representation in film, but the one that gets me is, "If you don't like the Hollywood presentation of Blacks why don't you make your own films? This statement on the surface seems fair enough, but it doesn't touch upon the fact that mainstream audiences judge films entirerly different depending on the filmmakers involved. My question is would anyone have even considered making Django, or a film similar to it if a Black director or screenwriter had proposed it? Would it even be getting half the attention it's getting now? And why is it that Django isn't considered a "Black" film when done by Quentin, but it most certainly would be relegated to that status if a Black director had done it? As for Django spurring a lot of copycats, I'm not really worried about that, not even bad copycats as far as history goes the only time a successful Black film spurred a genre was Sweet Sweetback, and Hollywood has shown no interest in jumpstarting any time of Black film movement even with a successful film to prove it can be done.


It's crazy to me how fiercely anti-Tarantino people are because of the one "dead nigger" monologue. So me, as a woman, should I be anti-Spike Lee because of the downplayed rape scene in "She's Gotta Have It?" There ain't an artist in the world whose work doesn't contain some problematic elements. At least not a good one. That's not a reason to completely write them off especially when you have an artist like Tarantino whose work as a whole contains more complex and well-developed black characters than any other white Hollywood director. So can y'all at least watch the movie (with an open mind) before you start firing off? As a side note, I hope Spike Lee watches it, gets pissed and decides to produce his own slave film like he did with "Miracle at St. Anna." Except this time its good.


A screening for "specially-invited audiences." Was this the director's guild screening? Not sure of the demographics for film but DGA membership for television directors breaks down–73% Caucasian Male; 13% Minority Male; 11% Caucasian Female; 4% Minority Female. Looks like a case of the producers attempting their very best to gin up selective feedback.


To be honest this review is why I have a problem with this movie. People who don't know enough about the enslavement act as if this is a documentary. It's not.
"Talk about crabs in a bucket. His character reminded me that some blacks kept blacks down harder than anybody."
What? SMH.
I will see the movie for free by renting from the library.


This review told me nothing other than he liked it better than he thought he would and that he found "Lincoln" to be boring.

gerard kennelly

i have the script

anybody want to hear spoilers ? ? … :)


I am guessing the American media are going to compare Django Unchained to the other slave era film Lincoln? Lincoln by the way is doing very well at the box office and making a lot of money. The reviewer didn't mention Kerry Washington's role in the film I thought she had a big part in the movie.


This movie is already stirring up various emotions. I'll definitely have to see it for myself.


David Manning said it's "must see". First the giggling slave girls now the slave master wasn't bad he was just a product of his times and the real villain is another slave because they really kept other slaves down. This is an evil amoral movie but it is expected. I won't be organizing any boycotts (worthless) or writing any long soliloquies about this movie but I will be very interested to see how many black bloggers (and movie goers) support this movie because of the promise of muzzled heroics from a black male lead. You know scraps in a cesspool.


Snooze. Let me know when Hollywood makes a Nat Turner movie then we can talk. Then will I say that Hollywood has "balls" speaking to Matty's point about the film being "ballsy." This isn't "ballsy" by any stretch. It's low-hanging fruit. Kudos on making an "entertaining" film about slavery since that's what everyone supporting it seems to be hanging their hats on, but this looks like a retread to me of black and white buddy action films we've already seen, just in a different setting. Give me a Nat Turner movie. Better yet, give me a Nat Turner movie written and directed by a black writer and director then I'll say that Hollywood has balls.

that dude

Haters are gonna hate. I know there are people who are gonna have a hard time letting go of all their carefully culvitated venom for this film, but I applaud this reviewer for having the integrity to judge the film on its own merits. I know there are people who aren't sophisticated enough to see this "entertaining" film is actually smarter than the preachy slavery films that we usually get served up, but some movies can actually do both at the same time.


I dont get it, I dont get why this guy thinks you shouldnt make a film about slavery "cause its hard to watch". Oh really, like we dont see more brutality on every movie, like they dont make War-movies every year …. and oh yeah, "films" like Saw and the other BS.

Just tell me how good this movie is and keep the other stuff to yourself. Like 95% white audience eh? So you counted? tssss…..

Adam Scott Thompson

I didn't plus one for this film to receive socio-political nourishment. Some of you are doing way too much; it's just a movie — a spaghetti western homage at that. This filmmaker sounds a little high-strung; either lose yourself in the story or back out of the saloon doors slowly. I did like what he said about the Candy character. Having a degree in History — with African-American history as one of favorites to research — I can say that for most slaveowners it really was just business. Slaves were chattel, just like other beasts of burden. Slaves were beaten but rarely maimed or killed and weren't starved (although some had to supplement their diet personally); imagine setting your car on fire or not filling it up with gas because it started too slow yesterday. We could have these kinds of "debates' among us all day long, but let's keep the "Django" experience in perspective. If you think it's disrespectful, don't watch it — simple. As Matty said, Tarantino's got balls (hate him or love him). That's why his films are so much fun, regardless of the subject matter. Some of you need to hum a spiritual and get on with it. I wonder how the slaves themselves would feel if they got to watch an advance screening (lol).

Matty Rich

Well, if people are looking for a more serious and thoughtful film about this subject, like Sergio said, they shouldn't be looking through Hollywood's catalog. I enjoyed reading this review and I'll be seeing this film. When's the last time a ballsy film like this was released by Hollywood with a mostly black cast? If we can enjoy demeaning trash like Coffy and Foxy Brown, I see no reason why we can't enjoy something like this, which is also meant to be entertaining.


Well, this is exciting…but for someone who finds Lincoln "sleep-inducing", he loses a lot of credibility to me. I don't know anything about American history, but I was still able to follow the film without falling asleep.

willie dynamite

Ted, I agree a film that addresses the deep reaching plague of slavery should be made, but tarantino isn't trying to make a film like that, nor is any studio. If you think white folks already understand how bad slavery was, go to Texas, or Mississippi, or Fox News, or look at the reactions to the film The Help like he mentioned. They can't comprehend how bad it was because they have never had to. The oppressed and the oppressor can look at the same thing and see it totally differently.


Well this film is clearly fiction. That's what people need to remember. Tarantino is no scholar. No I don't plan on wasting time watch this film.

willie dynamite

Ted, I agree a film that addresses the deep reaching plague of slavery should be made, but tarantino isn't trying to make a film like that, nor is any studio. If you think white folks already understand how bad slavery was, go to Texas, or Mississippi, or Fox News, or look at the reactions to the film The Help like he mentioned. They can't comprehend how bad it was because they have never had to. The oppressed and the oppressor can look at the same thing and see it totally differently.


I'll end up seeing the film, but this does not assuage my fears. I saw how Tarantino handled the Holocaust. Not only did IB trivialize the experience of the Jewish people, but the innumerate homages to Nazi propaganda cinema throughout the film were nauseating (go do some research into Nazi cinema and you'll see what I mean). Slavery is a serious topic, I doubt Tarantino even has the maturity to deal with it in a serious way. One line that was odd for me in this comment was that the predominantly white audience realized how fucked up slavery was … I would hope they already thought that going into this. Even the most virulent modern racists don't actually support slavery anymore. But this gets back to my original pet peeve about this movie. Tarantino kept insisting this was such a brave film for dealing with slavery- but it's not brave. A movie about slavery let's the audience look back on past injustices and say to themselves how much better we are. It's comforting, not trying. A confrontational, difficult film would show the difficulties faced in American black communities today. The injustice that results from the complex interaction of laws, culture, history etc . Force viewers to confront the tragedies of today and expose how most of us (including my fellow black Americans) sit around complacent with daily tragedies. That would be a brave film. But I've gotten off track. Tarantino has never made a serious, thoughtful film and the issue of slavery deserves a serious, thoughtful touch- I doubt Tarantino will start now.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *