Back to IndieWire

Quentin Tarantino Says Newtown Tragedy About “Gun Control And Mental Health” Issues, Not Movie Violence

Quentin Tarantino Says Newtown Tragedy About "Gun Control And Mental Health" Issues, Not Movie Violence

With the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut still lingering on the mind on the nation, there has been an awful lot of talk (but not much action) from politicians and pundits on both sides of the issue. But perhaps grabbing the biggest headline, for better or worse, was the lunkheaded NRA VP Wayne LaPierre, who dredged up the old argument that movie violence (citing films like “American Psycho” — which has no guns — and “Natural Born Killers“) as the cause of these kinds of incidents, not the wide availability of assault weapons and magazines that carry more payload that anyone realistically needs outside of the military. With his own blood spurting “Django Unchained” in theaters, NPR‘s Terry Gross broached the subject with director Quentin Tarantino, who bristled slightly at (again) being asked about the effect of violence on society.

“I’m really annoyed. I think it’s disrespectful. I think it’s disrespectful to their memory, actually,” Tarantino said about being asked movie violence. “[It’s disrepectful to] the memory of the people who died to talk about movies. I think it’s totally disrespectful to their memory. Obviously, the issue is gun control and mental health.” Hear, hear.

Gross started the conversation by basically asking if Tarantino is sensitive to what happened in Newtown, and his own viewing habits following such an incident. “Do you mean like on that day would I watch ‘The Wild Bunch‘? Maybe not on that day,” he replied, adding: “Would I watch a kung fu movie three days after the Sandy Hook massacre? Would I watch a kung fu movie? Maybe, ’cause they have nothing to do with each other.”

But if there’s one thing on the big screen that Tarantino will not abide by, it’s animal death. “The only thing that I’ve ever watched in a movie that I wished I’ve never seen is the real-life animal death, a real-life insect death in a movie. That’s absolutely positively where I draw the line and a lot of European and Asian movies do that, and we even did that in America for a little bit of time,” he said. “I don’t like seeing horses being yanked on cables from running Ws. I don’t like seeing animals murdered on screen.”

“…movies are about make believe. It’s about imagination. Part of the thing is we’re trying to create a realistic experience, but we are faking it. And the faking it is the art. The faking it is the art of it, it’s the make believe of it all. I don’t think that there’s any place in a movie for a real death,” he continued. “And you can say, oh, [Sam] Peckinah shot the heads off the chickens in ‘Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid‘ but it’s OK because they ate the chickens afterwards. And actually, maybe those chickens got three more days of life because they were taken out of a slaughterhouse and everything. Well, you can justify it that way because people eat chicken and I eat chicken, so all good. I don’t want to see real death, though, that’s the problem. It’s the watching of the real chicken get his real head blown off. I didn’t, I don’t pay money or I don’t want to sit down and watch real death when I watch a movie. I don’t even want to see an animal terrified. I’ve seen movies where they’ve terrified an animal to get a response from him and I don’t want to see that.”

Undoubtedly, this won’t be the last we hear on the subject. Share your thoughts with us below.

This Article is related to: News and tagged ,



All of the carnage has occurred in "gun free zones" that filter out and incapacitate those with good intentions and cannot possible stop those with bad intentions. Right now there are 80 times as many concealed carry license holders as there are on-duty non-federal police in this country.


Just stating. American psycho does have a scene were he shoots someone. Then he shoots a police car to blow It up. Sorry to ruin your article..


The main problem is that no group wants to take any part of the blame for events like Newtown. Movie makers say it isn't the fault of the movies. Musicians say it isn't the music. The NRA points the finger at all the others. And I'm sure that if there were mental health stars, then they would be blaming others as well.
The fact of the matter is, it is everybodys fault, but nobody wants to take even a small portion of the blame. Crazy person + no respect of human life + guns + bad parenting + media sensationialism = mass killings. Only when the finger pointing stops, and conversation starts, will the problem be solved.

Mr. B

Frankly, I have concluded that media nor availability of guns has much of an effect on violent crime. If you really look at the FBI statistics since 1992 violent crimes have been reduced by over 50% with the predominant amount of violence occurring in urban areas with populations over 250k – many of these areas have extreamly tight gun control. In addition the UK has about 3x the violent crime of the US when correcting for populations centers (and as you know the UK has a zero tolerance gun policy). If you are serious about reducing crime, improve the educational and economic conditions of urban areas – but I guess that might be too difficult and not feel as good as taking firearms from law abiding citizens.

Les grossman

Gun control and Mental health.two words "Tarantino Genius".i can see some frustrated people here having mental health problems who come here to bitch about QT


QT is not qualified to comment – if he uses onscreen violence to exorcise his own violence issues, what about the billions of viewers who go the other way? No American movie directors have a clue on irony, nor how to use it in film. And which of them has experienced post-traumatic-stress syndrome?


Insects? Really? Really?
I may agree with him, but asking QT what he thinks about this topic is as pointlessly idiotic as asking the NRA.


QT is 100% right on this. It's because we don't take care of our mentally ill people in America combined with easy access to guns that these tragic massacres happen.


to say they're unrelated is weak though. accepted culture can desensitize folks to behavior. movies aren't to blame, but they add to the confusion of popular culture (for folks with lesser social skills, kids too) if the emotional junk that comes with violent actions isn't conveyed well enough. most games have zero emotional context. movies can be equally guilty. sounds like a lame question from Terry, but there are discussions that should be had about culture and violence. why not? A roundtable talk with game-makers, filmmakers, television producers would be interesting. not to lame blame, but to dig a little.


Interesting how a horse gets its brains blown out in the first scene of "Django Unchained." It's make believe, of course, but I wonder why, if he feels so strongly about animal violence, that he went that route?


that interview was pretty awkward at one point..


QT's right. Blaming entertainment for the violent ills of the world is backward and stupid.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *