You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Christopher Doyle Calls ‘Life Of Pi’ A “Fucking Insult To Cinematography,” Hates On ‘Lincoln’ & More

Christopher Doyle Calls 'Life Of Pi' A "Fucking Insult To Cinematography," Hates On 'Lincoln' & More

While high-profile Oscar contenders like Best Picture winner “Argo,” “Zero Dark Thirty” and “Django Unchained” all had various amounts of haterade poured all over them, one movie that was pretty much untouchable all season long was “Life Of Pi.” Outside of the whole mini VFX controversy thing — which really only happened after the Oscars — Ang Lee and his film were embraced by the industry, winning four statuettes for Best Director, Best Cinematography, Best Score and Best Visual Effects. But certainly, not everyone was taken with the movie.

The usually opinionated and salty cinematographer Christopher Doyle recently sat down with Blouin and made his feelings quite clear on “Life Of Pi” and the work behind it. “Okay. I’m trying to work out how to say this most politely, and no offense to – I don’t know him personally – but what a total fucking piece of shit,” he declared about Claudio Miranda‘s win for Best Cinematography. “Let me be blunt. Ah, fuck. I don’t care, I’m sure he’s a wonderful guy and I’m sure he cares so much, but since 97 per cent of the film is not under his control, what the fuck are you talking about cinematography, sorry. I’m sorry. I have to be blunt and I don’t care, you can write it. I think it’s a fucking insult to cinematography.”

But his anger seems more to be at the voting body (“Do you know the average age of the people who vote? Sixty-five. Check it out.”) and the idea of anyone outside the cinematographer working on the look of the movie. “Of course they have no fucking idea what cinematography is.The lunatics have taken over the asylum, but you know we have other asylums in other parts of the world and I live in one of  them, and I intend to continue to be a lunatic,” he (kind of) explained. “…The award is given to the technicians, to the producers, it’s not to the cinematographer. I think he should’ve actually, if it were me, I would’ve said fuck off. But of course it’s his career. Sorry. Personally, as you probably realised, I will say fuck off. If somebody manipulated my image that much, I wouldn’t even turn up. Because sorry, cinematography? Really?”

So, from his perspective, was it weird for “Life Of Pi” to win Best Cinematography? “No it’s not a strange choice if you understand how fucked up people are and how lost they are. You bail out your bankers, support your rich people, you say Spielberg and Tarantino are the gods of cinema. Hey, good luck.” Um, okay.

But his vitriol on Oscar contenders didn’t stop there. “ ‘Lincoln‘! Oh! Let’s talk about patriotism. Do you not fucking realise the rest of the world just sits back laughing. Do you not realise that you poor old fuckers with your Academy bullshit, you’re just sitting back, holding onto straws. You’re holding onto straws. Let’s get on with it. I don’t give a fuck what you think about me,” he said. “Some of us have to engage with the real world. And it happens not to be about the history of Mr. Lincoln freeing the slaves – which was the most disgusting first three minutes of a film I’ve ever seen. ‘Oh, Mr Lincoln, oh, but you understand…’ stop fucking fluffing yourselves.”

However, Doyle is not a total crank and his admiration and inspiration comes from unlikely corners. “Ai Weiwei is the Tom Hanks of Chinese cinema,” he enthused. “Ai Weiwei is so fucking beautiful on film because he’s so solid, he doesn’t give a shit. He is the great male star of the future of Chinese cinema. Please quote me. He’s the George Clooney of the new wave. Once he sees [the footage] he’ll either burn everything we ever shot or he’ll embrace it.”

And he looks to the young generation to push the medium forward. “So many people ask me very often, so, how do you engage with the digital medium. I say the kids are going to teach us. We’re the students,” he says. “The people who are on YouTube or engaging 24 hours of almost every day of their lives, who are online and having visual digital experiences every day, they’re the ones who are going to teach us.”

As for how he’ll wrap up his own career? “I know I will die with either a camera in hand or a woman on top – what more could one ask of life?” How zen. [via Film]

This Article is related to: News and tagged , ,


Comments

My name

I added my voice to the conversation

Andrea OL

"But his anger seems more to be at the voting body ("Do you know the average age of the people who vote? Sixty-five. Check it out.") "

Why is Doyle anti-old people? Also, it seems to me that the old members of the academy, in having voted for a movie using the latest technology, are up to date with things.

Alan R

He's right. Even his own VFX team called Miranda out!

Alfred

A drunk can't be stopped once their mouth starts flapping.

connie

1. Claudio Miranda was also nominated by the American Society of Cinematographers.
2. Doyle talked about so much about cinematography of "Life of Pi", but he hasn't even seen the film. Doyle does have his point, but it would be better for him to watch the film before making an argument.

bob hawk

Talented as Chris Doyle might be, and whether he's "right" or "wrong" (always debatable), this article is an embarrassment and should never have been given space. Whether he's off his meds, drunk or whatever, it's just an inarticulate rant, lacking any focus or specificity. It's pathetic — and engendering over 40 comments to boot. Jeez!

Michael M.

He seems like a competent man who has his life fixed. But come on? taking his opinion seriously is counter intuitive to his trolled objective. He hates the Academy and makes comparisons to the likes Tom Hanks.

Sorry but his argument is officially invalid IMO.

Oh and The Master should have collected the statuette for Cinematography.

John

Tarantino is the reason Hero got international distribution. Furthermore, Doyle has publicly talked about how several scenes of Hero were saved by digital grading.
STFU Doyle and stop drinking on the job.

gilbert

If this is the trend, so that means we can nominate Gollum for Best Supporting Actor?

Lisa

I'd like to remind people that "Life of Pi" was one of the 5 films nominated by the American Society of Cinematographers (ASC) as one of the best-filmed movies of the year — and, as many keep pointing out, professional cinematographers (as opposed to actors, writers, and directors) should be the ones who know which work is most worthy of praise. It doesn't seem likely to me that they would be so stupid as to nominate a film that was actually a joke from a cinematographic perspective. At the least, it certainly undercuts his argument. I agree that it is interesting to compare the history of the ASC Award Winners with the Academy Award Winners. Although the list of nominees is often similar – since the nominees for both groups are chosen by the cinematographers – it would seem to indicate that the Academy does indeed tend to lean towards the over-all final "look" of the film, CGI and all included, as compared to the ASC. It seems true that "Pi", "Hugo", and "Avatar" relied more heavily on CGI than "Skyfall", "The Tree of Life", or "The White Ribbon". Though, did he complain when "Inception" won the ASC several years ago? or when "Hugo" or "Avatar" won the Oscar? I don't know. Times are changing, and perhaps so is what constitutes cinematography. One last comment, to those who still doubt the contribution of Claudio Miranda, and who feel he was essentially shooting a guy in a boat with a blue screen behind: I would suggest that you read some of the interviews of Miranda and Ang Lee, regarding how they shot the film. I found them really interesting. Lee mentioned that he specifically chose Miranda because of his past work with both 3-D and Digital, both special skill sets in-and-of themselves. I especially remember them talking about the "candle scene". A LOT of work (and thought) went into this movie, photographically — not the least of which was the very act of having to balance the old-fashioned cinematography with the immense computer-generated requirements.

Cole

For everyone (The Fanciful Norwegian, Ronnie D, Bob, Burgersam, Daniel, DJ) who answered my question down there, thank you very much. Sorry I don't know this guy, I don't exactly know many cinematographers…

By the way, I'm not a "he", I am a "she".

CHARLES FOSTER KANE

Looks like Mr. Doyle forgot to take his meds.

Gilles

Nice and lively discussion here. :D

I think there are a lot of assumptions here about Miranda's role in the whole process. I can remember from the wall-e commentary (right?) that they consulted with Roger Deakins about the cinematography and I feel his influence is really felt in the sense that this is the first animated pixar film where you have great use of the aesthetic of motion picture camera's and how these behave, including things like anamorphic-like bokeh's and the use of DOF.
The assumption that Miranda only shot a guy in front of a blue screen might be unfouded. Because he might have played a major part in all the 'lighting' of the cgi environments.

That being said. You could still (as Doyle does) interpret the award as insult to the craft because the creation of all these beautiful colours and whatnot (I haven't seen the film yet) had nothing to do with the craft of cinematography. The one where you work with your hands.

Al N

I would actually agree with Mr. Doyle's assessment, however, I have just one question:

Was he even sober during this interview? If you know him at all, you'll know exactly about what I am speaking. Think he'll even remember his own comments until he reads them here? Shame. A waste of a talented man.

LRS

The cinematographers vote for the cinematography award. There seems to be comments as well as Doyle's comments that 'everyone' votes and they don't know. If the cinematographers voted for it, they are the 'experts' so they should know for what they're voting. Specials effects or not, there had to be some great camera work done. It didn't 't film itself. And it is beautiful. And as Doyle has said, he hasn't seen it.

Alex

He's right, and as the guy who has shot most of Wong Kar Wai's best films, he has more than earned the right to comment.

Currently Hollywood

I was slightly offended by the mini VFX comment, the industry is treating these guys like 1930s day Newsies, but major blockbusters rely heavily on VFX.

James

Agree 100%. Anyone who doesn't agree is fucking retarded. And this isn't even about bias or jealousy or anything like that. It's about the simple fact that all Miranda did was shoot the kid on a boat to a blue background for every fucking shot. And then the VFX guys did all the magic. I understand the visual effects oscar. But cinematography? Really? That IS a fucking insult to the art. The oscars have been making some batshit idiotic choices these past few years.

Alan B

I absolutely agree with Doyle's point about the Life of Pi win. I couldn't hack that nomination, let alone its win. It was just like in 2010, in which Bruno Delbonnel rocked Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Barry Ackroyd killed The Hurt Locker, Robert Richardson shot the hell out of Inglourious Basterds and Christian Berger delivered a very original and shocking look for The White Ribbon … and the guy who previously shot the Stallone remake of Get Carter won for a film that was predominantly CGI. For real? The other films had – arguably – some of the best cinematography of its decade, but Avatar wins, a film which has amazing visuals, but not-amazing cinematography in a CGI spectacle. It would be like a screenwriter winning for a script that was ultimately changed completely by the director. A bit of a fraud, really. It's disappointing, however, that Doyle completely lets down his argument with his 'Lincoln' rant. What a bunch of incoherent nonsense masquerading as a cogent thought: 'Oh my God, patriotism! Oh my God! Doesn't Spielberg know it's his job to tell us American sucks? What an asshole!'

Lucano

Doyle can eat some Hollywood cock! It's about the final result, many old timers feel the sensation of menace when it comes to new technology. Theres more to cinematography than the technic that was applied (digital,analog,CGI,etc), for example, the composition, the use of light & colors, just to name a few.
#Doyle you lost my respect.

Glass

When people say Life of Pi is "90% CGI" or something, I'm convinced they never saw the movie and they're just thinking of the trailer shots with the whale and the glassy water at sunset. Claudio can take all the credit he gets, because he busted his ass and did incredible work that shows in the final film. I guess watch the making-of on the DVD to see what I mean (or just see the movie?).

Bob Roberts

He brings up an interesting point. Although, he's not able to articulate it clearly, he's saying that an old way of awarding/praising a film's look and quality is outdated with the emergence of digital technology. We have to rethink what it means to be a cinemtographer in this new age. He thinks that the look you get from the dailies on that day is the real craft of the cinematographer. If you can get over his rambling a bit, he's saying something important.

John

By his own reasoning, he is to the English language what the film's cinematographer is to "Life of Pi." That is, he is entirely undeserving of the accolades he's getting here.

anon

"mini" vfx controversy…its not mini to those who hollywood relies on to make their billions and the audience who hope to escape from a scary reality just lost their jobs.

the industry imploded, its a fucked up system…you should be a bit more appreciative of those that are abused for your leisure

harry

Agree with Doyle almost all the way through, except the part about learning from people online all the time. That's not living, that's dying.

Dan

The Masters cinematography should have won the Oscar, it was the best.

Ted

I agree with on about the "Life of Pi's" cinematography. It doesn't sound like he's criticizing Miranda really, but he should have made that more clear. He comes off like a dick.

I also 100% agree about Lincoln, though. Lincoln was the only film I've ever seen where I hated it in less than 5 minutes.

Stephanie Martin

Doyle cares about his craft. There's a significant difference between that and not giving a shit about the Oscars. As for Hugo, do your research. Most of the work was done in camera and on real sets.

Joe

For someone who doesn't give a shit about the Oscars or it's voters, he should does spend a lot of energy and anger on it.

Jackson

Also, why the hell does he care if Miranda won the Oscar if he doesn't care about Oscars?

Jackson

Yawn….another "Good-At-His-Job-but-Totally-Unlikeable" crew member who thinks he is above everyone else because they win awards. I don't care if he shot Hero, he is still a canker sore of a man and would probably insult Deakins if he had the chance.

Toliet Baby

I completely agree that it's ridiculous to give a movie that's 90% CGI the Oscar for cinematography. It's a travesty Roger Deakins didn't win this year.

sam

and good call on the silly patriotism.

Pierre

"Fuck off" "Sorry" "Fuck off" "Sorry"

haha. He's the best.

THOR

I don't get it. What movie does Ai Weiwei act in? No info on IMDb.

hatr

Ang Lee looks like Tiger Woods

COLE

Who is this cinematographer Christopher Doyle?? Does anyone know what movie he's in for??

Peter

Spoken like a true hater

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *