You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

OBLIVION

OBLIVION

Truly
original science-fiction ideas are few and far between, at least within the
realm of Hollywood moviemaking, so Oblivion
scores points for both its premise and its execution—up to a point. And if
you’re going to spend two hours with just a handful of characters, they might
as well be played by charismatic and attractive people like Tom Cruise, Andrea
Riseborough, and Olga Kurylenko. (Their faces even stand up to scrutiny on an
IMAX screen!) What’s more, Cruise reaffirms his position as the ultimate Movie
Star, completely credible in both his physicality and ability to convey
feelings lurking just beneath the surface of that ageless face.

The time is
2077. Earth is no longer habitable, having been plundered and nearly destroyed
by an alien invasion. Cruise and Riseborough live in a modernistic structure from
which they patrol their perimeter and supervise the drones that protect Earth’s
remaining resources from “scavs.” Their memories have been wiped clean, lest
they be distracted by an emotional tug or two from their former lives—yet
Cruise keeps experiencing dreamlike flashbacks that he can’t explain. Perhaps
that’s why he’s a bit of a maverick, disobeying orders from the Big Brother-ish
space station called Tet and even from his true-blue partner. This can only
lead to trouble, but it also opens him up to discoveries—the kind of forbidden
knowledge he shouldn’t be allowed to acquire. 

Oblivion is a handsome, eye-filling
movie with striking production design by Darren Gilford and cinematography by
Claudio Miranda (who just won an Oscar for shooting Life of Pi). The landscape is as imposing as the sets and props, which
include a wonderfully futuristic motorcycle.

The trouble
with Oblivion is that its “secrets”
aren’t difficult to penetrate,  so the
closer we get to the story’s conclusion the less interesting it becomes. I’d
say it remains fairly solid up to the three-quarter mark. Measuring (again) by
Hollywood science-fiction standards, that’s not bad: the movie held me in its
grip and, although it sounds superficial, I didn’t mind looking at its three exceptionally
good-looking stars. (Morgan Freeman and Melissa Leo make worthy contributions,
as well, though Game of Thrones’
Nikolaj Coster-Waldau has a relatively small and thankless supporting role.)

Director
Joseph Kosinski, who gave us the tepid Tron:
Legacy
, is working here from his own story and graphic novel. Oblivion isn’t bad, by any means, and
its faults certainly don’t lie in its impressive physical production. But
science-fiction, as much as any genre (and maybe more than most) depends on a
great idea at its core, and this one simply isn’t original enough. 

This Article is related to: Reviews and tagged , , , , , , , , ,


Comments

Jesse Burleson

I agree with you on Oblivion not being original enough. But I can't agree with the performance of Tom Cruise being solid. He is a movie star yes, but his acting has gone downhill and he clearly went through the motions on this flick. You can check out my review of Oblivion if you want. It's on coleandthatchersmovies.blogspot.com

OJ

A good review, but the film is excellent fun, and very beautiful. As a sci-fi fan I enjoyed it immensely!

Clu

I agree with Mr. Maltin in writing that Cruise is the ultimate Movie Star. I have yet to see Oblivion but for me, Tom Cruise (borrowing a baseball metaphor) tries to hit the ball out of the park everytime. He may not always succeed for some but for me he's one of those rare actors that will have me giddy with excitement standing in the popcorn line at my local Ciniplex knowing that I'm about to see a Tom Cruise movie. A friend of mine said to me that Cruise is always playing the same character: loner, military trained and always a few steps ahead of everyone. Maybe so but if his movies are entertaining then why carp?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *