Back to IndieWire

Response to Eva Longoria’s ‘Devious Maids’ From Cosmo Editor Who’s Seen It

Response to Eva Longoria's 'Devious Maids' From Cosmo Editor Who's Seen It

Since we last posted the promo trailer on the site for the upcoming Lifetime series, there has been more backlash against the Eva Longoria-produced TV show Devious Maids, directed by Desperate HousewivesMarc Cherry, and starring Dania Ramirez, Ana Ortiz, Roselyn Sanchez, Edy Ganem, Judy Reyes and Susan Lucci.

If you haven’t been following any of it, apparently The Huffington Post’s Tanisha Ramirez posted an op-ed piece criticizing the show stating it was a “wasted opportunity” and that “the minute-long trailer manages to efficiently portray Latinas as hypersexual, nosy, scheming and, at times, totally invisible domestic servants, one set of pushed-up breasts, devilishly squinted eyes and sassy hair flip at a time. What the trailer doesn’t do, however, is allude to the supposed actual premise of the show.”

Exactly! Well, Longoria fired back, you know since Latinas are “fiery” and all; I kid, but the producer penned THIS response in the defense of the show, in which Longoria said the following:

Stereotypes are constructed and perpetuated by those who believe in them. I choose not to. As an executive producer, I choose to break the cycle of ignorance by bringing to light something we have not seen before, a deeper, more complex side to the women who live beyond the box that some choose to put them in. The only way to break a stereotype is to not ignore it. The stereotype we are grappling with here is that as Latinas, all we are is maids. And yet, this is a show that deconstructs the stereotype by showing us that maids are so much more.

To be fair, this is only an excerpt of Longoria’s full piece, which you ought to read.

There was yet another response to the show and/or reply to Longoria’s latest rebuttal, this time from Cosmo Latina’s editor-in-chief Michelle Herrera, who, after seeing the show, poignantly articulated many of the qualms some of us have with it:

Many of my family members have worked as maids, waitresses, factory seamstresses and janitors. I watched my mother come home from jobs where she took orders, cleaned floors, and answered to wealthy women. But here’s the difference between them and the women shown: In our house, the priority was finding a better life, whatever it cost. My mother didn’t waste her time trying to seduce “el patrón,” “gossip about her bosses,” or beg for their mentorship. When she left her job, she was a comedian, an art aficionado, and a lover of literature. She took classes and studied books, ours and her own, so that we could all build a better life together. She built mentorship groups and did community service. And she showed me the hustle and self-sufficiency that made me the woman I am today, proving that there were no boundaries to what we could we do. For her, our place in “that house” was to run things, not to wear a uniform.

By the way, read Herrera’s full piece HERE, in which she also adds, “You told us you lived in a West Hollywood “sorority house” with other powerful women. I can only imagine the conversations that go on at your kitchen table; I’m sure your fans would love to hear about them. What if there were a show about that?”

Yikes! I can’t say I don’t agree with Herrera, but I’ll refrain on more commentary until I’ve seen the show, at least the first couple of episodes, which begin on the Lifetime network June 23.

Will you be watching? Thoughts?

This Article is related to: News and tagged



"Stereotypes are constructed and perpetuated by those who believe in them. I choose not to".

That's great and all, but it doesn't matter whether Longoria subscribes to or believes in stereotypes. As long as those who make decisions and write the large checks subscribe to stereotypes, the battle for more balanced representation for people of color wages on.

"The stereotype we are grappling with here is that as Latinas, all we are is maids. And yet, this is a show that deconstructs the stereotype by showing us that maids are so much more".

If your point is that Latinas are more than just domestic help, wouldn't it have been a better idea to make the Latinas on the show everything EXCEPT FOR maids?

How about engineers? lawyers? professors? There are Latinas in all three of those fields. I know, because I met these women while I attended college.


Well to start off eva longoria and most likely those on the show are going to defend it, because it would look stupid to not, when you are apart of the cast. Secondly, ignoring a stereotype or facing it head first when it's pertaining to your racial group doesn't always go as planned. Spike Lee addressed the light, dark stereotype in school daze, which was good, but then Don Imus used the negativity portrayed in the movie, as a reference for females basketball players. Maybe living inside of the Hollywood bubble, has everyone thinking differently,but everyone is not going to see the positive side of this. Somewhere down the line when she is randomly having a conversation with someone who is not latino, and they blurt out oh eva you are such a devious maid, will she ignore it, or address it .


I'll pass
I haven't watched lifetime since they canceled Blood Ties…

Skater Boy

Well, I think Devious Maids really has nothing to do with ethnicity. Stupidly Marc Cherry didn't think just to use all sorts of races for the maids – just replace 3 or 3 of them with some caucasion, Black African American, Jewish and Asian ladies It is about people working as maids and well really entertainment oriented – for fun and even some comedy it was never meant to be cerebral or to change the world other than make fun of human nature regardless of class, race, religion or even gender. Not everything is a political statement – it is entertainment!

Miles Ellison

Lifetime is all about perpetuating and creating stereotypes. If this show is as progressive as Longoria says it is, it won't be on long. Since Lifetime greenlighted it, it's probably more of the same crap.

Charles Judson

I can't take seriously commentary based on a one-minute teaser trailer or a post that ends with five lines of dialogue for which I'm offered no context. Herrera expends more energy filtering the show through her personal experience than she does analyzing the show itself.

These are opinion pieces. Valid pieces that no one need permission to write.

It's understood that these are in part motivated less by the show and more by the comments of the creators and talent involved. It's also understood that these shows exist in a society in which race, ethnicity, class and profession are coupled in troubling, often dangerous, ways.

However, these pieces are by no means credible critiques. That would require someone having watched the show and watched enough of it to systematically dismantle it with rigor. As it stands now, these posts are recycled, superficial blather. It's critical thought set to auto-pilot, not reasoned analysis of a tangible property that's seen the light of day.

Let's dig into this show when it's three or four episodes in. Not when it exists in the public space as a few digital one sheets and a teaser trailer.


And I just read Tambay's piece on Deggans and stereotypes and how they are incomplete. Eva needs to read that and watch Chimamanda Adichie's Danger of a Single Story. So this continues to perpertuate the most popular stereotypes of Latinas in American TV. You're either the sexy bombshell like Sofia Vergara or the maid like the women in this show, or you're both. The sexy bombshell maid. The only good thing that can happen here is if the ratings are low and it's canceled. Someone needs to look into Lifetime's programming decisions because it seems like they are trying to draw a wider audience by appealing to black women with all those movies recently and now Latinos. Although would Latinos watch this or is it more for white women?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *