World War Z

World War Z

I can’t pretend to be a zombie-movie aficionado, but I found
World War Z to be tense, absorbing,
and scary. Brad Pitt is established as a devoted husband and father at the outset
so we never lose rooting interest, even though the challenges he faces grow
more extreme as the story progresses. By the time we get to the nail-biting
climax he pretty much represents us onscreen, desperately trying to clear one
hurdle after another in an effort to save the day and return to his wife and
kids. This is tried-and-true storytelling and it works like a charm.

The visual effects are impressively deployed by director
Marc Forster to make every trial and encounter seem horrifically real, from the
first zombie outbreak in Pitt’s hometown of Philadelphia to later, more
grandiose set-pieces in Jerusalem, on a full-sized jet, and in a laboratory
building in Cardiff, Wales.

Pitt isn’t depicted as a superhero. He’s gutsy and seemingly
fearless, but it’s his resourcefulness and his ability to keep cool in the midst
of chaos that makes his character so admirable.

I understand that the screenplay—which is credited to a
handful of writers who pitched in during the movie’s long, troubled gestation—is
very  loosely based on Max Brooks’
best-selling book. I can only judge the finished product, which I enjoyed, all
the more so because the filmmakers were forced to downplay graphic gore in
order to get a PG-13 rating.

On the other hand, I found watching this in 3-D to be an
annoyance. It added nothing to the experience and left me with a headache.
(Like many  current releases it wasn’t
shot in 3-D, with its director and cinematographer staging each scene to take
advantage of the process, but converted after the fact. It shows.)
By aiming to please a mass audience, the people behind World War Z may turn off horror-movie diehards who crave more blood
and guts, but they’ve made a movie that wimps like me find not only palatable
but satisfyingly scary.

          

This Article is related to: Reviews and tagged , , , ,


Comments

Norm

Maybe if Mel Brooks made a Zombie film it would be interesting…

Martin Grams

The novel takes place ten years after the Zombie War and is not a fictional novel, rather, it is a series of interviews with survivors who each tell a story. The interviews are presented in chronological order so it tells the story from the first outbreak to the reconstruction of society. It is a fictional report commissioned by the U.N. Social commentary, politics and general realism to how we would cope with such a scenario is explored in each of the interviews ranging from two to thirteen pages in length. The zombies do not run and I can understand why the writers might not have wanted to do the movie in documentary style. Will watch it Wednesday, hoping it is faithful to the novel and not just using the novel's name. With no central character in the novel, I suspect it won't be faithful.

Patrick

The Scottish Bagpipe Capital!
That's an interesting location choice, I wonder if there were many shooting difficulties in regards with the weather.

Brian

"from the first zombie outbreak in Pitt’s hometown of Philadelphia to later, more grandiose set-pieces in Jerusalem, on a full-sized jet, and in a laboratory building in Cardiff, Wales. "

It wasn't shot in Philadelphia though… It was Glasgow, Scotland. :o)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *