Back to IndieWire

10 Actors Hollywood Tried And Failed To Make Happen

10 Actors Hollywood Tried And Failed To Make Happen

This week, a small-scale indie Australian surfing movie called “Drift,” which details two surfing brothers struggling to overcome their debt-ridden backgrounds and avoid a descent into criminality, opens in limited release. It shares almost nothing in common with the Biggest-Movie-Of-All-Time “Avatar” except its star, Sam Worthington, who in fact plays third lead here behind two largely unknown Aussie actors as the brothers. If it seems like a far cry from Pandora for Worthington, well, that’s because it is. Nothing to do with the quality of the film, but just in terms of the whisper-quiet buzz it’s getting, which Worthington’s presence alone should have beefed up if his stock in Hollywood meant anything at all. Yet despite a concerted effort that happened back there, Worthington just hasn’t ever become a bankable studio lead, and so here we are.

It’s hardly the first time (and won’t be the last) Hollywood has decided that a certain actor is gonna be huge and has done all it can to make that happen, and yet it hasn’t. It’s kind of strange and a little unfair that in a town where we’re regularly assured that every waiter is an actor waiting for his break, some never get a shot while others get more than one, even if audiences don’t embrace them the first time out. But it also shows how strange an echo-box tinseltown can be—sometimes all that needs to happen is that Studio X hears Studio Y loves This Guy for their next big star, and Studio X then has to cast him, and so on. Then a few years later This Guy has six movies coming out, and is on every magazine cover, and audiences, unless they fall in love with him instantly, feel a little aggrieved that they’re so forcefully being sold an unknown quantity.

The circumstances differ, but the phenomenon is the same, so we’ve taken a look at the careers of 10 actors who, despite repeated attempts, We The Audience in our fickle magnificence have simply not deemed worthy of the A-list.

Ryan Reynolds
Attempts At The Big Time: Blade Trinity” (2004), “The Amityville Horror” (2005), “Just Friends” (2005), “Definitely Maybe” (2008), “X-Men Origins: Wolverine” (2009), “The Proposal” (2009), “Buried” (2010), “Green Lantern” (2011), “The Change-Up” (2011), “Safe House” (2012), “R.I.P.D.” (2013)

Where Did It All Go Wrong? The archetypal example on this list, Reynolds has been tapped as a potential megastar for close to a decade, and every so often looks to have made the leap… nearly. The Canadian actor’s been acting since he was a teenager and his ABC sitcom “Two Guys And A Girl” in 1998 helped land him his first lead role in college-com “National Lampoon’s Van Wilder” in 2002. It was a charismatic and funny turn, and he soon started cropping up elsewhere—proving to be the highlight of the otherwise execrable “Blade Trinity” and finally getting a studio lead in “The Amityville Horror.”

And so he entered his bankable phase, thanks to some modestly successful comedies like “Waiting…” and “Just Friends” that performed well on video, even if more expensive prospects like ‘Smokin’ Aces” and “Definitely Maybe” didn’t land. 2009 proved Reynolds’ biggest year yet; a showy turn in “X-Men Origins: Wolverine,” an acclaimed supporting part in indie “Adventureland,” and most crucially, a giant rom-com hit opposite Sandra Bullock in “The Proposal.” He seemed to have arrived in a big way, and lined up a trio of promising prospects—one-man-show indie “Buried,” R-rated comedy “The Change-Up” and superhero tentpole “Green Lantern.” But the Reynolds train was held up when all three underperformed massively, the latter two in the same summer of 2011. By that point, however, Reynolds was already signed to a couple of other projects and the first of these, “Safe House,” proved to be a solid hit, saving the actor’s bacon for a moment.

It was the second of the pair, however, that may prove fatal: “R.I.P.D.,” the “Men In Black“-esque supernatural action-comedy was once one of Universal‘s big summer hopes, but by the time of release, they seemed to have given up on it (knowing, as the rest of us do now, that the film was lousy), and it absolutely bombed, now destined to take a place in the all-time flop hall of fame. Worse, Reynolds was also the lead in animation “Turbo” the same weekend, which underperformed as well. Strictly speaking, neither was directly Reynolds’ fault—”Turbo” suffered from animation fatigue in the market, while Universal had no faith in “R.I.P.D” whatsoever. But studio executives have already cooled on offering Reynolds tentpole leads—he bowed out of the “Highlander” remake a while back and “Deadpool” is never, ever gonna happen.

To his credit, he’s course-correcting, looking to work with interesting filmmakers like Atom Egoyan, Marjane Satrapi, Anna Fleck and Ryan Boden, and Tarsem on upcoming projects. And we hope it works out as Reynolds is a likable presence, popular in comedies and can be very strong in smaller roles. But short of a Matthew McConaughey-like turnaround (and let’s not forget, much of this would have applied to him a few years back and now he’s the lead in Christopher Nolan‘s new film), we suspect it’s going to be a long time before Hollywood tries to push him as a major box-office draw again.

Any Thoughts? Reynolds told Details Magazine in 2011: “I’m in a very lucky and fortunate place… I remembered walking down that very same street maybe 10 years ago, just shrouded in a sea of abject failure. I had, like, a stick with a handkerchief with some dry, stale bread in it and that was all.”

Taylor Kitsch
Attempts At The Big Time: “X-Men Origins: Wolverine” (2009), “John Carter” (2012), “Battleship” (2012), “Savages” (2012)

Where Did It All Go Wrong: Poor Taylor Kitsch has, despite only a handful of credits to his name, become something of a byword for this kind of actor, after Hollywood stacked a lot of chips on him last summer, most of which they failed to recoup. The Canadian former model had a few movie credits to his name—teen comedy “John Tucker Must Die,” “The Craft“-with-bros thriller “The Covenant” and the infamous “Snakes On A Plane“—when he was cast as running back Tim Riggins in the TV translation of “Friday Night Lights.” The series was a huge critical hit and Kitsch was an immediate standout, brooding and charismatic. A few seasons in, the actor got his first big movie role—an extended cameo as fan favorite character Gambit in “X-Men Origins: Wolverine.” It proved to be a less auspicious start than he might have hoped, but despite the movie being terrible, the role was small enough that it didn’t harm Kitsch’s rep too much.

Indeed, quite the reverse: soon afterwards, Kitsch was cast as the title character in Andrew Stanton‘s “John Carter,” a much-anticipated Disney tentpole. And once that wrapped, the actor also landed the lead role in another $200 million megamovie, “Battleship.” Both shot as long as two years in advance of release, meaning Kitsch had a lot of hype in the run-up to their releases in the spring of 2012 (barely two months apart), hype that only increased when he won a sought-after lead in Oliver Stone‘s “Savages.”He was either going to be Hollywood’s next big star, or a spectacular cautionary tale… The buzz around “John Carter” turned poisonous as release neared, and that was borne out when the hugely expensive film took a nine-figure write-down after severely underperforming.

“Battleship” may have seemed a safer prospect, but when it was released, in the aftermath of the behemoth “The Avengers” and accompanied by awful reviews, it too was a major dud, also losing north of $100 million for its studio. Again, neither failure can be laid squarely at Kitsch’s feet, but he certainly didn’t boost their box office in a way that a more established star might have. “Savages” performed a little better, relatively speaking. The far cheaper film made nearly $50 million but it didn’t suggest that Kitsch had gathered any kind of following, and besides, it was too little too late and his name was already tainted. After a decade that saw the biggest movies dominated by the off-beat charms of Johnny Depp and Robert Downey Jr., Kitsch was just a little too bland, or at least the characters he was given were.

Wisely, or perhaps by necessity, the actor’s steering clear of further tentpoles for the moment. He’s reteaming with “Battleship” helmer Peter Berg for awards candidate Lone Survivor,” he’ll be at TIFF with Don McKellar‘s The Grand Seduction, and is playing a gay rights activist in Ryan Murphy‘s HBO movie The Normal Heart. In other words, he’s taking the baby steps into features that he skipped the first time around, and hopefully showing off some more of the acting chops his TV stint had us all convinced of, back when.

Any Thoughts? With the two blockbuster failures in the past, Kitsch was finding a silver lining as he told the AP: “Maybe it’s a blessing in disguise that [it] died, and I’m not tied to these things for the next 10 years. I’m free to do whatever I want now. If I want to do something in January, February, March, April, I don’t have to go through two studios to be greenlit.”

Colin Farrell
Attempts At The Big Time:American Outlaws” (2001), “Hart’s War” (2002), “Minority Report” (2002), “The Recruit” (2003), “Daredevil” (2003), “SWAT” (2003), “Alexander” (2004), “Miami Vice” (2006), “Fright Night” (2011), “Total Recall” (2012), “Dead Man Down” (2013)

Where Did It All Go Wrong? Farrell’s a rarity in that he’s had not one, but two shots at the big leagues, from bright young thing to comeback kid, and despite some fine performances over the years, broader audiences have consistently failed to respond to him when he’s been anointed a tentpole lead. The Irish actor broke out aged 24 in Joel Schumacher‘s “Tigerland,” giving an intense performance that promised big things. And big things soon arrived: while early leads “American Outlaws” and “Hart’s War” whimpered, he convincingly squared off against Tom Cruise in Steven Spielberg‘s “Minority Report,” and carried solo show “Phone Booth” impressively, and the film became a modest hit. Things seemed to be ticking along decently. “Daredevil” and “S.W.A.T.” both made some coin, albeit not as much as he was perhaps hoping. But Farrell then headlined a pair of hugely expensive tentpoles, in “Alexander” and “Miami Vice,” and both flopped.

The actor, who’d been having substance abuse issues, wasn’t licked yet, though; he cleaned up, regrouped, and returned with a strong performance in the storming “In Bruges” that reminded everybody why they’d been so excited about him in the first place. A few other smaller gigs followed, some of which worked, some didn’t, and a financially disappointing return to bigger fare with Peter Weir‘s “The Way Back” was mitigated by an against-type, combover-wearing cameo in comedy hit “Horrible Bosses.” But since then, things have been bleaker with a couple of major summer flops in “Fright Night” and “Total Recall,” which made less money than the twenty-years-earlier Paul Verhoeven original.

Films more in his wheelhouse didn’t perform much better either, with “Seven Psychopaths” and “Dead Man Down” both failing to find much of a theatrical audience. Ultimately, Farrell is not dissimilar to Jude Law; like him, Farrell’s really a character actor in the hot bod of a leading man, whose finest hours have come in smaller-scale fare like “The New World,” “Ondine” or “A Home At The End Of The World.” But while Law’s now found his place, mostly happy to play second fiddle to Robert Downey Jr. or take meatier character parts for noted filmmakers like Steven Soderbergh or Joe Wright, Farrell—who never really established a new persona once he shook off the hellraiser mantle—is still being pushed as a headliner. He was to star in the since canceled Arthur & Lancelot for Warner Bros., and has Winter’s Tale on the way from the studio. But unless the latter proves an unexpected smash, expect to see less of that sort of thing and more like his upcoming supporting turns in Saving Mr. Banks and “Miss Julie.” And to be honest, that may be for the best.

Any Thoughts? On the eve of the release of “Total Recall,” Farrell told The Observer: “I’d done a certain amount of big budget films that didn’t perform that well. Consequently, there weren’t that many big films that were coming knocking for me. I was probably due an arse kicking. I really was… I can’t say that I sat down and said, ‘Right, I am going to reinvest.’ I know from talking to some friends and different people that it looks as though I’ve tried to redesign my career, but it’s not really like that.”

Taylor Lautner
Attempts At The Big Time: “The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl 3D,” (2005) ‘The Twilight Saga‘ (all 5 films, 2008-2012), “Valentine’s Day” (2010), “Abduction” (2011), “Grown-Ups 2” (2013, uncredited cameo)

Where Did It All Go Wrong? One image always comes to mind when we think of Taylor Lautner’s career in relation to those of his two more successful “Twilight” co-stars: a little fat wheezy kid constantly playing catch-up yelling “Hey guys! Wait up!” between blasts on his inhaler. While human protein shake Lautner is himself anything but tubby, and as far as we know, untroubled by asthma, his short resume outside the “Twilight” films really does gasp for air, and this is despite the guy’s obvious ambition and work ethic. The terrible would-be actioner “Abduction” not only starred Lautner, but was the debut production of his very own shingle Tailor Made Entertainment. Which is clever and funny because his name is Taylor!!?!! LOL.

But Lautner’s transparency about what he wants is almost endearing—not for him the auteur-driven “serious actor” path to which Robert Pattinson aspires. Lautner wants to be an action star, and for a while there, Hollywood seemed to want that too. In fact, in the faraway land of 2009/2010, Lautner caused something of a bidding war for which based-on-a-toy action star he would take on. First signed as Mattel’s “Max Steel” for Paramount, when he was still in the thick of his role as moony werewolf Jacob Black, suddenly reports of Lautner being the Next Big Thing were everywhere, and Universal, itself with Hasbro’s “Stretch Armstrong” in the cards, also took the bait. At first, it seemed like The World’s Highest-Paid Teen Actor TM might do both, but the rivalries not just between movie studios, but between the two biggest toy manufacturers made that untenable, and Lautner quietly disengaged from “Max Steel.” Sadly for him, Universal then saw the numbers on “Abduction” and cooled considerably on ‘Stretch,’ which has since found a new home at Relativitysans Lautner.

So look, Lautner’s obviously not our cup of tea, and he literally has not got a single decent film to his name (depending on how you feel about “Sharkboy and Lavagirl”), but it does seem he’s something of a victim of the weird Hollywood buzz machine. Something bright and shiny like a Hasbro movie might have been just the ticket to find him a new audience, but testing his suitability for that with the deathly dull “Abduction” seems off. That was never a film that Lautner’s established female fanbase wanted to see, and why were teen boys (presumably the core potential audience) going to flock to watch the guy who played the permanently friendzoned werewolf who fell in love with a baby in “Twilight”?

With an icy silence surrounding his erstwhile Michael Bay team-up and his next mooted YA project “Incarceron” the only thing inked on Lautner’s dance card is the upcoming Tracers” (logline: a bike messenger fleeing danger gets drawn into the world of parkour by a beautiful stranger). However he did have a potential gig with Gus Van Sant and writer Dustin Lance Black, both of whom need a hit after their last films and have the chops to maybe give Lautner an indie career. It just remains to be seen if he can show us anything other than abs and his “Blue Steel” face in terms of acting range to warrant such a chance.

Any Thoughts? “Number one, nothing comes without hard work… And two, you have to be persistent. You’ve got to keep pushing, keep driving, because in this business, you’re going to hear ‘no’ a lot more than you hear ‘yes… You never know, in this business, when it’s going to come to an end,” he said in a 2010 interview with Michigan’s MLive.

Sam Worthington
Attempts At The Big Time: The Great Raid” (2005), “Terminator Salvation” (2009), “Avatar” (2009), “Clash Of The Titans” (2010), “The Debt” (2010), “Last Night” (2010), “Man On A Ledge” (2012), “Wrath Of The Titans” (2012), “Drift” (2013)

Where Did It All Go Wrong? It might seem a touch unfair for the star of the biggest-grossing movie of all time, James Cameron‘s “Avatar,” to make this list. And indeed, for about six months in 2010, it looked like Sam Worthington might be on the way to being a legitimate box-office draw. But when you compare his career path to that of the male lead of Cameron’s previous billion-dollar grosser “Titanic,” it’s clear that Worthington is not going to be the next Leonardo DiCaprio. The Australian actor started out with a few small roles in Southern Hemisphere-shot pictures like “Hart’s War” and “Dirty Deeds” before legitimately impressing in the indie “Somersault.” A small role in the WWII picture “The Great Raid” followed, along with the lead in a not-so-great contemporary version of “Macbeth,” but then along came Cameron.

“Avatar” was in post for years, but Hollywood didn’t wait to cast Worthington in some of their biggest tentpoles, with the actor wrapping both “Terminator: Salvation” and “Clash of the Titans” ahead of the release of “Avatar.” The ‘Terminator’ picture was actually released six months ahead of it and while it didn’t perform badly, few were particularly enthusiastic about the movie, or the actor’s turn as secret robot Marcus Wright. He was better in “Avatar,” if not immediately making a case for all the hype and only a few months later, ‘Clash’ surfed the ‘Avatar’ 3D wave to big box office numbers too. It was about as solid a start to an A-list career as you could ask for, but things have been tougher since.

To his credit, Worthington moved towards tougher fare but while “The Debt” was a modest hit (and features one of his better turns), “Texas Killing Fields” and “Last Night” both mostly disappeared on the festival circuit and Worthington never seemed at home in either. 2012 was worse, with the actor leading two studio pictures in the first few months of the year, “Man On A Ledge” that tanked and sequel “Wrath Of The Titans” which significantly undergrossed its predecessor and pretty much killed the franchise (if anything, Worthington had gotten worse in the second film). He flirted with various other big projects in the intervening years—a “Dan Dare” reboot, Quatermain,” Dracula: Year Zero,” comic book adaptation The Last Days Of American Crime—but few materialized (including a pair of more recent sci-fi actioners) and his only movie this year is this week’s surfing movie “Drift.”

Now, he looks to be returning to the kind of indie fare he got his start in, with civil war drama “The Keeping Room” and Philip Noyce‘s “For The Dogscoming up, but it’s a mark of how his star has fallen that his next studio flick is playing second fiddle to Arnold Schwarzenegger in David Ayer‘s “Sabotage.” Worthington’s competent enough, but he’s never seemed entirely comfortable with the American accent, and can come across as bland. Still, there’s always future “Avatar” movies, although any profile boost from those will be negligible.

Any Thoughts? Worthington expressed regrets over “Clash Of The Titans” in 2012 to the Daily Telegraph: “I was disappointed with my performance. I was a fucking bland action dude. I don’t think I created a character and I screwed up. When it comes to 3D, I’ve been in the movie that got revered the most [Avatar] and the movie that got slated the most.”

Alex Pettyfer
Attempts At The Big Time:Stormbreaker” (2006), “Wild Child” (2008), “Tormented” (2009), “I Am Number Four” (2011), “Beastly” (2011), “In Time” (2011), “Magic Mike” (2012)

Where Did It All Go Wrong? After the success of ‘Harry Potter,’ and with a swathe of young adult adaptations brewing, the end of the last decade saw cheekboned English public schoolboys being shipped to the U.S. in volume. Some became instant pin-ups (see: R-Patz), some barely seemed to get off the starting blocks (spare a thought, and ideally some change, for “Eragon” lead Ed Speleers), but few appeared to have the world at their feet in the way that Alex Pettyfer did. The actor was just fifteen when he filmed junior-James-Bond British actioner “Stormbreaker,” a modest hit at home, which was followed by Emma Roberts teen-com “Wild Child” and horror “Tormented,” before he was snapped up by DreamWorks to star in hotly-tipped young-adult sci-fi “I Am Number Four.”

With that film in the can, and supernatural romance “Beastly” also on the way, he suddenly became the toast of Hollywood: DreamWorks were developing a biopic of racing driver James Hunt (soon to be played by Chris Hemsworth in Ron Howard‘s “Rush“), and Pettyfer was offered the lead in YA adaptation “The Mortal Instruments,” with Screen Gems allegedly so high on him that they wouldn’t greenlight the film without him. Pettyfer soon bailed on the project (which got made anyway) in favor of the film that became “The Seventh Son,” and was linked with a host of other high-profile gigs, including Jack The Giant Slayer,” The Bourne Legacy, The Hunger Games,and even the chance get peed on by Nicole Kidman in The Paperboy.”

But suddenly, whispers started, culminating in a hit piece in The Hollywood Reporter that, essentially, said Pettyfer was a bit of a dick. Bad behavior on the set of “I Am Number Four,” and on the marketing trail for “Beastly” was reported, as well as Pettyfer allegedly asking for a $10 million payday for ‘Mortal Instruments,’ and most of the other gigs dried up, including “The Seventh Son.” Steven Soderbergh came to the rescue, offering Pettyfer a co-lead in stripper picture “Magic Mike,” alongside Channing Tatum. But Pettyfer seemed to blow it. He’s fine in the movie, but rumor has it he alienated both Soderbergh and Tatum on set, to the extent that he was excluded from the later stages of the press tour. The story’s not necessarily over: Pettyfer has a few gigs coming up, including a supporting turn in Lee Daniels‘ “Lee Daniels’ The Butler” and the lead in the “Endless Love” remake, but they’re not quite the world-beating offers he was getting a couple of years back. Lesson to prospective A-listers: don’t let it go to your head too fast.

Any Thoughts? Pettyfer told VMan Magazine, around the time of the release of “Beastly”: “L.A. is growing on me a little bit but it’s still a shit hole. I think it’s this insidious pool where nearly everyone lives in fear. Geographically it’s fantastic, but socially it’s disgusting. I wish they’d run all of the cunts out… Being an actor is like being in prison. You go, you serve your time, you try and replicate Johnny Depp‘s career and then you move to Paris.”

Skeet Ulrich
Attempts At The Big Time: “The Craft” (1996), “Scream” (1996), “The Newton Boys” (1998), “Chill Factor” (1999), “Ride With The Devil” (1999)

Where Did It All Go Wrong? Something of a blast from the past, but Skeet Ulrich (now principally a TV face most recently seen on “Law & Order: Los Angeles,” and featured in a pilot from “Homeland” creators Howard Gordon and Alex Gansa called “Anatomy Of Violence” that wasn’t picked up) was in many ways the Taylor Kitsch of his day. He started off as an extra before studying at NYU and landing with the Atlantic Theater Company. After a CBS special, Ulrich had a clutch of roles in 1996 that got him noticed: as Winona Ryder‘s boyfriend in “Boys,” Sharon Stone‘s brother in death row drama “Last Dance,” a role in Kevin Spacey‘s directorial debut “Albino Alligator,” and most memorably, he figured as sinister love interest in two big horror hits, “The Craft” and “Scream.”

It was the latter in particular, where Ulrich played boyfriend/eventual killer Billy Loomis, that really got him heat, and after featuring on the famous Vanity Fair Hollywood cover of that year (albeit relegated behind the second fold with fellow never-quite Jonathan Schaech and some guy called Will Smith), landed a couple of roles the following year. First came Paul Schrader‘s undervalued “Touch,” then a smaller role in the Oscar-winning “As Good As It Gets.” These seemed to confirm Ulrich’s rising star, and he was soon stacking up leads—joining Matthew McConaughey and Ethan Hawke in Richard Linklater‘s Western “The Newton Boys,” and reteaming with Cuba Gooding Jr. for “Chill Factor.”

But neither film landed: Linklater’s picture was a famous flop, and “Chill Factor” did about as well as you’d hope a movie best described as “‘Speed’ in an ice-cream van” would. There was one more big picture to come, alongside fellow rising star Tobey Maguire as the co-lead in Ang Lee‘s Civil War movie “Ride With The Devil.” Again, Ulrich is decent in the film, which is undervalued, but it failed to connect with any kind of audience after lukewarm reviews (making only $635,000 on a $40 million budget).

Since then, Ulrich’s movie roles have been scarce (“Armored” being the most notable), but he’s carved out a fair niche for himself on TV thanks to cult show “Jericho” and his “Law & Order” stint. He was never lacking in talent, but perhaps never quite carved out his own identity (we still confuse him with Stephen Dorff, to be honest, while early on he looked almost distractingly Johnny Depp-like), and while his choices were often honorable, the films themselves never quite took hold. Still, he’s only one Sofia Coppola-advocacy away from a return to the big screen…

Any Thoughts? Ulrich told Interview magazine back in 1996, as his movies were about to hit: “Whatever labels are being pinned on me have nothing to do with me. I think people could justify labeling me if they saw a pattern in what I do, but right now that’s impossible. As for being a magazine pinup, that’s the machine—it’s not really me. They could say I was the next Max Perlich, but it’d still be me.”

Gretchen Mol
Attempts At The Big Time: Rounders” (1998), Woody Allen‘s “Celebrity” (1998), “Donnie Brasco” (1997), Music from Another Room” (1998)

Where Did It All Go Wrong? Here’s the thing: Gretchen Mol is an excellent character actress who has done consistent work for two decades and has really come into her own on shows like “Boardwalk Empire.” But in the late ’90s, things were a bit different and not a lot of it was her fault. In 1998, in the pre-extra-super-savvy Internet days, Mol was featured on the cover of Vanity Fair fetchingly wearing a see-through slip dress and dubbed the “It Girl of the Nineties” by the magazine. The problem with this insanely premature proclamation, aside from not even having had the proper time to come true, was it was essentially based on only a handful of movies from 1997 and 1998 (basically the ones listed above)—hardly a definitive consensus what a ’90s It Girl should represent. Did Mol have amazing publicists who duped Vanity Fair into thinking the moderate buzz she had was about to transform her into the next A-list ingenue? Yes, but all it really did was set up hopelessly impossible expectations for the actress (at the time, this outrageous media coup/folly was said to be the none-too-subtle bullyish work of Miramax’s Harvey Weinstein that released both “Rounders” and “Celebrity”).

Making matters worse, all the aforementioned movie roles were supporting ones and when she was hoisted on the cover of Vanity Fair in ‘98 she was essentially an unknown leaving the public thinking, “Who???” and the rest of the media suppressing giggles. While Mol continued to go on doing strong character work over the years (“3:10 To Yuma,” David Wain’s “The Ten,” Neil LaBute‘s “The Shape of Things” and Mary Harron‘s “The Notorious Bettie Page” being a few examples), the perception was she was poised for greatness, “sank into obscurity” and was felled by the “Vanity Fair cover curse.” In May 2012, Mol was put on the cover of Town & Country with the title, “A star is reborn: how she broke the Hollywood curse.”

One of the elements of the Vanity Fair piece that turned out to be untrue was that Mol was discovered as the hat-check girl at Michael’s, a New York restaurant once known for its ease with which to spot celebrities. “It was the Weinsteins,” Mol said of that nonsense rumor. “[They were] in the business of making stars, with cigars hanging out of their mouths. That was the imagery. And I was a hat-check girl. First of all, who is a hat-check girl? I never checked a hat in my damn life.”

Any Thoughts? Mol felt the sting of Harvey and Vanity Fair’s big decision and watched whatever buzz she gained quickly fade. “It suddenly felt very, ‘Hey, she’s not all that,’ ” Mol told the New York Times in 2003. ”What you find out is that just as quickly as people get behind you, they fall away. I watched as the doors went open. Then, I watched them as they closed.”

Stephen Dorff
Attempts at the Big Time: “The Power Of One” (1992) “Judgment Night” (1993), “Backbeat” (1994), “SFW” (1994)

How Did It Go Off Track? Like Skeet Ulrich and other beautiful-faced men in their 20-something prime, Stephen Dorff was on track, at one point in the mid-’90s, to be a big star. Or at least Hollywood and the media saw it that way. He had the disheveled good looks and gruff, bad-boy attitude, he smoked, drank: he was another Johnny Depp or Mickey Rourke, in the making as far as studios, magazine editors and publicists were concerned. After stints on TV including the short-lived “The Outsiders” series, 1992 saw him star in “The Power Of One” opposite Morgan Freeman at the tender age of 19, and then the following year, he scored one of the coveted leads in much-buzzed action thriller “Judgment Night.” Right around the same time as that film’s release, Dorff was cast in the video for Aerosmith’s “Cryin’” which essentially made Alicia Silverstone a star and certainly didn’t hurt him either, and reportedly he was offered the lead in TV’s “The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles”—he was on his way.

Accordingly, along came his too-cool-for-school roles, like The Beatles-centric “Backbeat” and “S.F.W.,” both of which did minor business, but bolstered his up-and-coming “It-Boy” status. Soon he was living the dream: Details magazine (who actually kind of mattered at the time) called him the “best new actor of his generation” and he was hanging with R.E.M.’s Michael Stipe (they pal around with Tori Amos in a separate Details piece). Stipe even showed up the 1994 MTV Music Awards wearing a hat to promote “S.F.W.” (where he was also bumrushed by MCA).

But while Dorff’s acting chops were… fine, what seems like his undoing was the arrogance which spilled forth in interview and on set. He would dog past roles (apparently telling a reporter “Judgment Day” was so stupid he could have “phoned in the fucker”). Of actors like Sean Penn and John Malkovich he boasted, “I know if I got on the screen with them, the screen would be just blown apart.” And he relentlessly talked himself up even about roles he didn’t take/get, saying “They are talking to five young actors about playing James Dean, but I’m not chasing it because no matter how brilliant I would be, it’s gonna fucking work against me.”

And so the kind of fame that Dorff and Hollywood were so convinced was coming never arrived. He had some colorful moments: Mary Harron‘s “I Shot Andy Warhol,” John Waters‘ “Cecil B. Demented,” and “Blade,” but none of these parts raised his profile significantly and it wasn’t long before he was taking parts in straight-to-DVD action movies like “Steal,” “Deuces Wild” and sinking, along with Christian Slater, to topping Uwe Boll‘s “Alone in the Dark” in 1995.

Dorff has cleaned up in recent years, taking a small, but wise supporting role in Michael Mann’s “Public Enemies” and then making a low-key comeback vehicle of Sofia Coppola‘s “Somewhere.” Eran Riklis’ “Zaytoun” seemed like another step in the right direction, as was tiny indie “The Motel Life” which he was very good in, but 2011’s “Carjacked” and “Rite Of Passage” demonstrate how the temptation for a paycheck gig lurks right around every corner.

Any Thoughts? Dorff isn’t exactly disagreeing with our assessment. “Yeah, I partied, and went a little crazy with the girls and had my drinking days, but I never got addicted to hard-core drugs…I think when I was younger, I was a little more self-absorbed, didn’t really think of other people,” he told Vulture in 2010.

Josh Hartnett
Attempts At The Big Time: “Pearl Harbor“(2001), “O” (2001), “Black Hawk Down” (2001),”40 Days and 40 Nights“(2002), “Hollywood Homicide“(2003), “Sin City” (2005), “The Black Dahlia” (2006) “Lucky Number Slevin“(2006) “30 Days of Night” (2007)

Where Did It All Go Wrong? Thinking about Josh Hartnett, which we do only rarely—that’s part of the problem—it’s hard to pigeonhole him into one of the other models of nearly-man: his big break, “Pearl Harbor” may have been a horrible turgid waste of an afternoon but it made money, so he’s no Taylor Kitsch. Nor has he developed a Pettyfer-like reputation for prickishness, that old story about feuding with Harrison Ford during “Hollywood Homicide” notwithstanding (and with Ford’s notoriously curmudgeonliness we’re willing to cut Hartnett some slack there). Nor are his acting chops as questionable as say Taylor Lautner’s. On occasion, Hartnett has impressed, notably in “Black Hawk Down,” “The Virgin Suicides,” intriguing if not totally successful Shakespeare riff “O” and even high-concept vampire romp “30 Days of Night.” So what went awry?

In fact, the story now goes that Hartnett’s falling short of the A-list was as much by design as accident. In the early ’00s, off the back of a host of “star of tomorrow” articles, not to mention PETA’s coveted “sexiest vegetarian of 2003” ribbon, Hartnett was offered the lead in Brett Ratner’s gestating “Superman” movie. But he turned it down, citing the ten-year commitment and his fear of being stereotyped as the reasons. Now, that movie did not come to pass, but saying no took some nerve: it’s the sort of opportunity more fame-hungry youngsters would pay PR firms just to claim they were even being considered for. And apparently he ruffled feathers, with Hartnett claiming that that decision alienated a lot of Hollywood power players, including his own agents.

Since his motives were noble, perhaps we wouldn’t deem him worthy of inclusion on this List Of Doom, if only the choices he made since then had been better. But somehow the desire to test one’s versatility as an actor seems less admirable when the results are as poor as the overplotted “Lucky Number Slevin,” the dubious “40 Days and 40 Nights” or the just bloody awful “Black Dahlia”—a film to which Hartnett was so committed to that he stayed attached to it throughout its half-decade long gestation. Even a hit like “Sin City” for his “The Faculty” director Robert Rodriguez couldn’t do much for his profile—after all, it’s little more than a cardboard role in a stacked ensemble.

More recently, Hartnett’s move indie-ward has also underwhelmed with “August,” “Stuck Between Stations” and “I Come With The Rain” ranging from just-OK to pretty bad and his upcoming Roland Joffe-directed “Singularity” plagued by production issues. In fact, the biggest blip Hartnett has made on our radar recently was as the result of a Twitter misunderstanding which had him temporarily, falsely rumored to be circling a new take on “Daredevil.” However the speed with which that took off indicates there is some latent awareness of the guy, so maybe a renaissance is not out of the question, and having recently been cast opposite Eva Green in the Sam Mendes-produced Showtime series “Penny Dreadful,” suggests it could happen.

Any Thoughts? “After ‘Black Hawk Down‘ there was a real lull. Everybody was trying to put me in action movies and heroic roles and I wanted to find more complex things. They just didn’t suit my taste so I thought, ‘OK, I have to be brave enough to say no.’ And for a while that hurt me immeasurably in the Hollywood world. A lot of people felt jilted,” Hartnett said in the UK’s Daily Record in 2011.

We kept the list to ten, but other actors who fit the bill that we considered include Clive Owen (somewhat in the Farrell mode, he just can’t seem to break out the way Hollywood thinks he should and has probably now settled into a respectable niche just below big-stardom) and Paul Walker, who has been pushed a couple times but outside of the “Fast and Furious” franchise has never been able to overcome a certain blandness. Jason Momoa was being put forward as a new action star after his turn in “Game of Thrones,” but with his stint (season 1) just a distant memory and “Conan The Barbarian” and “Bullet to the Head” both flopping hard Drogo needs to shake it up if he’s not going to slide into B-movie obscurity forever. Orlando Bloom has proved time and again just too slight a presence to be able to carry a film without the support of a massive “Lord of the Rings” or ‘Pirates‘ machine around him; Topher Grace we mentioned recently in TV Comedy Stars Whose Big Screen Careers Faltered, so enough said there; and further back in the past the likes of Chris O’Donnell and even William “Billy” Baldwin got maybe a few more do-overs than they deserved, without making any of them really stick. And yes, we’re aware how many of these choices are white and male, but whether that’s because we’re blinkered or because Hollywood in general doesn’t make as huge a push for female stars (who are unlikely to head up a summer tentpole) or stars of other ethnicities (ditto), we’ll leave you to decide.

So whose relative lack of success do you find inexplicable and who do you think has about as much chance as “Fetch!” of ever happening, no matter how high on them Hollywood might be? Let us know below. – Jessica Kiang, Oliver Lyttelton, Rodrigo Perez

This Article is related to: Features and tagged , , , , , , , , , ,



-"Deadpool" is never, ever gonna happen.- HAHAHA


Lol @ Deadpool is never ever getting made




Deadpool will never happen huh?


I hate avatar as much as I love about its special effects. It made Sam Worthington a one time box office winner.


My mistake. She WAS in fact in Brasco… But her part was minuscule. No one would remember her for that performance, much less judge her on it. Did she even have two lines?


Gretchen Mol was not in Donnie Brasco… That was Anne Heche


The word "tentpole" is used 8 times in this article.


Some interesting points brought up but really, now. These actors you deem 'failed' are to me under-the-radar actors who have done cool but obscure movies. Your mention of Clive Owen is ridiculous – his performances in Sin City and Closer were great.


Some of these guys are still young enough "to make happen"


Add Shia Labeouf to that list, his career is non-existent nowadays after he left Transformers.

Cheistophet Orseth

I do not agree with at least some of these actors on this list.

carmeisha eans

I want to play a part


I am surprised you mentioned Taylor Lautner but not Kellan Lutz.


You missed Hayden Christensen and Armie Hammer, and I like several of the other actors here, and that includes Sam Worthington and Josh Hartnett. I like Lucky Number Slevin, very much as a matter of fact, and I hope he makes a comeback. I believe, and I was talking about it with a friend who is insane about action films and the lack of young action stars, that Taylor Lautner is perfect, tailor made for that position. He is a natural athlete, he is in amazing shape, and has no big acting skills, so, tailor made! Just give the kid a chance, he is still very young. As for Alex Pettyfer, he is being punished for speaking frankly. He is good looking, he is a good actor and has screen presence; he just needs a better publicist, that's all, and a manager who can take care of him; after all, isn't that what managers are for? I like Ryan Reynolds better when he is not doing comedies, like Safe House and Buried. Never thought a film like Buried would keep me intersted from beginning to end, and he's the only actor onscreen. And come on! John Carter is not a masterpiece, but there are SO many bad films, I really don't get why this one in particular was so cursed. I am sure Taylor Kitsch will be back as well.


Erm…Speaking as an Actress who is currently working on a job that pays equity minimum, this article is a crock! For the most part these Actors are HUGE stars…Not everybody is going to have Brad Pitt's career and why should they, they are all different actors bringing different things to the industry. Just because an actor isnt on a path to "leading man" does not mean theyve failed to make it happen. Everyone has their own path and all of them are young enough/hot enough/popular enough to still make some extremely successful movies. In anycase they have all had successes, made a bucket load of money and are in the public eye.
If you are calling these people failures then what the hell are the rest of us!!!!! Get real.

Werner Kyne

I feel it is justified to add Russell Crowe to the list.
Started small in NZ/OZ got big quick in Hollywood quite early and then fizzled ever since.
Everything after The Insider was just going through the payday motions and his Superman cameo did not impress – though the suit of armour was badass, just not on a not very tall, 50 year old greying guy with a paunch.
He is not a man who is ageing well.
I hear his Noah gig may go straight to DVD, as a few of his recent films have.
If only Mel stayed in Australia – he'd still be at the top of his game, and Crowe irrelevant.


Sam Worthington, yes.
How about another Aussie in Myles Pollard?
Graduated from same class as Worthington and was instantly a success, where the other was not.
Pollard now just doing small DSLR shot features and online shorts, plus some pokey TV here and there.
But of course he is not yet listed here and Worthington is, so perhaps all is not lost for Pollard just yet.

Paul Muller

My Name is paul.I will love to share my testimony to all the people in the forum cos i never thought i will have my girlfriend back and she means so much to me..The girl i want to get marry to left me 4 weeks to our wedding for another man..,When i called her she never picked my calls,She deleted me on her facebook and she changed her facebook status from engage to Single…when i went to her place of work she told her boss she never want to see me..I lost my job as a result of this cos i cant get myself anymore,my life was upside down and everything did not go smooth with my life…I tried all i could do to have her back to all did not work out until i met a Man when i Travel to Africa to execute some business have been developing some years back..I told him my problem and all have passed through in getting her back and how i lost my job…he told me he gonna help me…i don’t believe that in the first place.but he swore he will help me out and he told me the reason why my girlfriend left me and also told me some hidden secrets.i was amazed when i heard that from him..he said he will cast a spell for me and i will see the results in the next couple of days..then i travel back to Germany the following day and i called him when i got home and he said he’s busy casting those spells and he has bought all the materials needed for the spells,he said am gonna see positive results in the next 2 days that is Thursday.My girlfriend called me at exactly 12:35pm on Thursday and apologies for all she had done ..she said,she never knew what she’s doing and her sudden behavior was not intentional and she promised not to do that was like am dreaming when i heard that from her and when we ended the call,i called the man and told him my my girl friend called and he said i haven’t seen anything yet… he said i will also get my job back in 3 days time..and when its Sunday,they called me at my place of work that i should resume work on Monday and they gonna compensate me for the time limit i have spent at home without working..My life is back into shape,i have my girlfriend back and we are happily married now with a baby boy and i have my job back too.This man is really powerful..if we have up to 20 people like him in the world,the world would have been a better place..he has also helped many of my friends to solve many problems and they are all happy now..Am posting this to the forum for anybody that is interested in meeting the man for can mail him to priest_gbenga.magic_temple(at)priest(dot)com, I cant give out his number cos he told me he don’t want to be disturbed by many people across the world..he said his email is okay and he also have a web site if you want to visit him there’ he will replied to any emails asap..hope he helped u out too..good luck.


i won BET award 2013. sorry, i won't say my name here, for some security reason. all thanks to mother esango who made it possible with her powerful magic spell she did for me. my album is blazing all over the world and i have a lot of fans here and there. thank mother.
you can contact her on esangoshrine(AT)gmail . com


Hi everyone i will never forget the help the Mother Esango Shrine render to me in my marital life. i have been married for 4 years now and my husband and i love each other very dearly . after 3 years of our marriage my husband suddenly change he was having an affair with a lady outside,i notice it then i was praying for divine intervention the thing became more serious i told my pastor about it we prayed but nothing happen. my husband just came home one day he pick up his things and left me and the kids to his mistress outside at this time i was confuse not knowing what to do again because i have lost my husband and my marriage too. i was just checking my mails in the office when i saw someone sharing her testimony on how the Mother Esango help her out with her marital problems so i contacted the email of Mother Esango. I told her my problem and i was told to be calm that i have come to the right place that i should fill some information concerning my self i did after some time she called me again congratulating me that my problems will be solve within 13days. She told me what went wrong with my husband and how it happen. that they will restored my marriage but i will make a free donation to their Shrine anything my heart told me. to my greatest surprise my husband came to my office begging me on his knees that i should find a place in my heart to forgive him i quickly ask him up that i have forgiven him.friends your case is not too hard why don't you give Mother Esango a try she powerful and kind. i know she will also bring back your husband. i promise to keep sharing her good work any time i'm on the internet. when ever i come across a forum like this, i always share the testimony. contact her via or visit her website


I really like Colin Farrell but I think I'd like to see him as a bad guy. He looks and seems like he would make a very good QUIET and sexy villain. I definitely like him as an actor but he does need to expand his character types. Perhaps he would be good in a romantic comedy. ?? If he has done one then forgive me. lol

Daniel Mann

This great information , you need your imdb.


Ever see a movie made before 1990?

ken lang

(underscore does not show up on my email even though I typed it in right after ken.)

I just now read this column. Were there previous editions? Because I'd like to know if Travis Fimmel ever appeared here.


Sean Bean, Alec Baldwin, and Rutger Hauer.


Where the hell is Pia Zadora?



Direct movie

You will really love this!! I foud a website where you can download HD movies in high speed, No regisrations needed and its 100% free. its

Direct movie

You will really love this!! I foud a website where you can download HD movies in high speed, No regisrations needed and its 100% free. its

Direct movie

You will really love this Playlist website! It is so good!


Umm.. I'm pretty sure they've made it they have all starred in big Hollywood movies movies and are probably filthy rich!


WHO GIVES A SHIT? THEY ARE STILL FILTHY RICH!!!!!! Millionaires!! Even if you make it, or you don't, you'll still become rich!!


WHO GIVES A SHIT? THEY ARE FILTHY RICH EITHER WAY!!!!!!!!! Millionaires!!!!! Either you make it, or not, you will still become rich!!


do you want to be an actor do you got all it takes contact amaka igwe studios today for more information on registration our email is amakaigweproductions at gmail dot com or call the M.D +2348100936562


Some of the actors on this list – namely Colin Farrell and Ryan Reynolds – don't really belong under the title 'tried and made it fail to happen'. Next to Farrell's name you've listed 11 movies in 10 years, with half of them being profitable. His problem – along with most box office flops – is that he has this ability to pick scripts which are destined to fail.

I can usually immediately tell whether or not a film is going to make a significant return by reading a synopsis and looking at the title, and I'm pretty sure a lot of other people can. But it doesn't matter who you are, if you are offered a huge budget box office film you're not going to turn it down. What puzzles me is how the studios sign off on some of them.


I saw Josh Hartnett in London at a play "Rain Man" (character Charlie Babbitt) and was amazing,also he's surprising in "Mozart and the Whale"(character with Asperger's syndrome ) and in movies as August and Lucky Number Slevin really excellent performances

Billy The Kid

GERARD BUTLER. enough said.

H.M Barnett

Very obscure one but Chris Klein? He opened with 2 biggies-"Election" & "American Pie" which were critical & box office successes with great buzz & are still fondly recalled. I know sadly that his drinking was definitely involved in his downturn. I wish him well and hope he is able to move on from his troubled past. Saw that he's listed on some episodes of "Wilfred" currently…the show with Elijah Wood (who may be another guy good for this list?).


Alex Pettyfer shouldn't feel too flattered about the Lee Daniels gig as Daniels only hires attractive white young guys so he can have them flopping around in wet see-thru underwear. Pettyfer's role will most likely be a similarly fetishized, sexualized role consisting of him skinny-dipping frequently and/or dancing in a towel.


Mediocre or outright poor scripts haven't helped these performers but the main problem is that alot of the guys(and gal) on the list aren't or weren't really charismatic or talented enough to rise above the material which is exactly what makes a movie star.

Back in the 90s before he became the consistent box office draw of today alot of Denzel Washington's attempted star vehicles were in pictures that aside from flopping or underperforming also weren't worthy of his talent (HEART CONDITION, RICOCHET etc) and yet from movie to movie he always remained a watchable presence. You never harboured doubts that Denzel would get to the level ppl were pegging for him despite the failures.


I agree with a lot of this list, but I also agree with most of the names in the comments as being eligible for the list. Is it possible that the real issue is that "movie star" in the classic Hollywood sense is gone? That they existed in an era where the studios built them and marketed them through a very limited number of essentially captive marketing outlets. Once the star/studio system broke down, the public was still inclined to follow the world of the stars that had been created, and met new stars in their films, so the cycle continued. With the explosion of other avenues for media and marketing, controlling the image and attention is much more difficult. I think exploring whether or not there has been a single new "bankable" star in the last 20 years shows that it's not inherently these actors faults. We, the audience, have changed. We haven't really allowed any new star to join the "we'll show up just because they are in it" firmament – because we don't think that way anymore. It doesn't matter who they are. Even historically "bankable" stars have to be careful not to step too far out of what we want from them if the money is going to roll in. When even Will Smith can flop massively, it seems the greater point is there may never again be true movie stars and they should stop trying to make them and focus on the quality of the project, the script and the talent – and quit trying to ensure the fame of an actor is enough to cover any and all other failings in the process.


Nicholas Hoult should be added to this one day.


Paul Bettany?


My wife and I were just talking about how this happened to Alec Baldwin back in the early 90's. He seemed poised for this leap into leading man territory as a steely-eyed tough guy but it just never took off. It's nice to see him reinvent himself as a comedic actor all these years later.


This article is so ridiculous. Who told you being considered A-list is everything? That doesn't mean being talented or genuine or having a good personality. It just means being a box office hit and we know even lousy actors can do that. Sylverster Stallone is one, morons. Adam Sandler, the Twilight kids, Schwartzenegger are examples too. The Playlist wants lousy controversy, not real journalism. PATHETIC. Shame on you.


Robert Pattinson deserve to be in this list. Outside that crappy franchise he hasn't had one hit. It's flop after flop, even pushing him as the lead to attract women. It's not working. Now he is just a supporting actor in obscure B-films.


Gerald Butler should be on this list. Consider every movie he's made after 300. Even Michael Fassbender who had a tiny role in 300 has surpassed him by miles…


Gerald Butler should be on this list. Consider every movie he's made after 300. Even Michael Fassbender who had a tiny role in 300 has surpassed him by miles…


Gerald Butler should be on this list. Consider every movie he's made after 300. Even Michael Fassbender who had a tiny role in 300 has surpassed him by miles…


Gerald Butler should be on this list. Consider every movie he's made after 300. Even Michael Fassbender who had a tiny role in 300 has surpassed him by miles…


Of course I realize the injustice of this list being predominately white male, but I was also struck by the fact that half the actors on this list are not Americans. Meanwhile three of the five American actors listed got their big breaks back in the 1990s. The trend too hire foreign actors to play Americans in big film roles is not an accident. Its all part of the economic war on Americans also known as globalization. Hollywood union busts by outsourcing TV & film production to other countries such as Canada, or Right to Work Southern American states. They hire non-American talent to prevent donations to the Democratic Party.


urgh…..and now I need to add my edits…"jawline"….and "good" in the final sentence.


Here's something novel…an ACTORS view. Had it occurred to you that lack of talent has nothing to do with the "bankability" of these guys, and that they just had the bad luck, or bad agent, to have picked DUD movies. I do not go to a movie to gush over the "lead", I want to be told a story and believe that he is part of it. Reynolds has GREAT comic talent and an engaging personality in non-comic roles too…….so maybe he just picked movies that were not going to do much for him. The main problem in the whole industry now is just what you have been talking about, movies being touted on WHO is there rather than WHAT…….talk about the actor, watch the actor, and try to ignore the fact that most of the film is rehashed, plot-less, bilge. There was a time when a movie about IDEAS sold, now it has to have whizzbangs every 10 seconds or the audience falls asleep. That says nothing about the quality of the acting, just the quality of the audience…..when the jawling outweighs the talent……give up on the industry…so about now would be a food time.


Umm what about Jaleel White? Hello???


For some reason. Gretchen Mol is the only one of these people I find attractive.

Anyway, I swear the Avatar guy always looks like he's been computer-rendered to me, no matter what thing of his I'm watching. Skeet Ulrich got a bad rap because he played a Johnny Depp-esque role in Scream. I don't think you can call any of these actors failures, we certainly know who most of them are and a few of them probably made some decent cash.

This is Mean

Not only is this mean, it isn't how acting careers work. Way to go, IndieWire. I'm going to write an article about articles you tried and failed to make happen. Dicks.

Jerry Hoffman

This is an interesting and obvious list. One has to come across from it and think – some of these actors are non-American and Caucasian. It is difficult to be the leading man type and sale a big budget film. I wonder if the opportunity is giving to minorities a 1/3 of the time as the Caucasian received and what will the results be. I just wonder if America is tire of watching a certain leading man type – read, boring. Because, in the past, the leads were very interesting on film. Maybe is time to diversify, not for the sake of diversifying to satisfy a particular quote in a racial harmony sense, but, to branch out in style of film making. I'm interested to see what will happen in the upcoming years in the film industry, where, the mentioned actors, even Johnny Depp in Lone Ranger is not a guarantee in big returns. Will they prop up more of the same kind of actors in the pool or take risk of interesting choices.


Colin Farrell is a good character actor, don't get me wrong, but all his big Hollywood productions failed in expectations, the same thing happens with Ryan Reynolds -His performance in Buried is imo underrated-. Reynolds and Farrell are two steps up of the list. They have chance to reinvent their career.

About the other names of the list:
Taylor Kitsch: He's mostly a bland actor -And yes, I saw all his "good" performances-. I still remember the lousy People's article called him: "The next Brad Pitt" lol
Sam Worthington: I give him chops for Somersault, The Debt and Last Night, but anyone else, ugh. But aside Farrell and Reynolds, he's the only one with a big chance of comeback.
Alex Pettyfer: Personally i'm glad. Maybe his destiny will be starring low budget erotic films like Martin Hewitt did after "Endless Love"
Taylor Lautner: While I think he's a lousy actor, maybe we should wait how Tracks will perform.

And maybe we should add other names:

Hayden Christensen: The perfect example of this phenomenon.
Orlando Bloom: Even his "succesful films" weren't exactly HIS films
Jessica Biel: The female Hayden Christensen. At this stage, her career is being "Mrs. Justin Timberlake"
Kate Bosworth: She's mostly known for her relationships than her work
Julia Ormond: At least Mol and her are succesful character actresses.
Katie Holmes: Right now, Michelle Williams is the most respected actress from Dawson's Creek.
Jessica Alba: Albeit her performance in "The Killer Inside Me" is great, her career is lackluster at best.

And I have doubts to put Rachel McAdams on the list: She's "Mean Girls", "Red Eye" and "The Vow", but her career felt on expectations, especially after "Morning Glory". But maybe "A Most Wanted Man" is her comeback role

The best part of this is that nothing is written in stone yet for some names and they can have a second opportunity or have the opportunity to be character actors:

Channing Tatum: Before 2012, he was on roll of this phenomenon, but then five consecutive box office hits and even critical acclaim took him on stardom.
Jake Gyllenhaal: With "End of Watch" and his theater work in 2012 he's having a second wind.
Garrett Hendlund: Excellent choice going to the indie route first like Ryan Gosling and Joseph Gordon-Levitt did
Julia Ormond: Like Gretchen Mol, she's better as character actress.


So no matter your acting chops, you only get a push if you are white. Well Danzel and Will are truly special for what they've done.

Ignacio Balbuena

I just wanna mention that 'Blade'', was directed by Stephen Norrington, Blade 2 was directed by Del Toro. Both are great, though.


Jason Statham has earned his place on this list!


Jason Ritter is a gem and relatively unknown as an actor. I've seen him in so so to not so good projects and he still manages to stand out and do his thing (Joan of Arcadia, The Event, Peter and Vandy). He was fantastic in the movie Good Dick (2008).

Indie Wire jumps the shark

Thoughts? A once-promising blog has descended into utter shite. Maybe you should take a hard look at your own careers.


Adam Brody?


WHY ARE THERE NO WOMEN ON THIS LIST? Gretchen Mol is the only female actor you could think of, really?

It's tremendously frustrating when the writers at Indiewire, who damn well know better, compile lists like this and only, or predominantly, choose male actors. Why do you do that, writers? Why?!


Where's the terrible terrible ASHTON KUTCHER?! Just Married, Cheaper by the Dozen, A Lot Like Love, The Guardian, What Happens in Vegas, Valentine's Day, Killers, No Strings Attached and New Year's Eve! And Kathryn Heigl for suuuuuuuure! Milla Jovovich, Jessica Biel, Russell Brand (love him but his films are never a hit), Katie Holmes, Megan Fox, Jessica Alba, Sienna Miller and Kate Bosworth!

Daniel Delago

Whatever happened to Gretchen Mol? She was good in a quirky rom-com titled, 'The Shape of Things' also starring Rachel Weisz. Interesting how Weisz's acting career skyrocketed and hers never took off. I think Brad Pitt said it best, "Fame is a bitch, man."


The fact that they are acting at all means they are successful. Not everyone has to be Johnny Depp. Colin Farrell is v successful and Taylor Lautner hasn't had time to prove himself yet/ He's 21..

bob hawk

This is a stupefyingly stupid article — rambling all over the place, from constantly employed actors with large bodies of works to some who have barely entered puberty (metaphorically, of course) in their careers. And who can say which of them even WANT to be "stars" in the conventional industry/studio sense? How can you even put Colin Farrell and Taylor Lautner under the same umbrella? And what's with the token female, Gretchen Mol? Absurd. Skeet Ulrich, whose career has been rich and diverse, if erratic, put it best: "Whatever labels are being pinned on me have nothing to do with me." I think in some cases these actors' careers have suffered because of bad management, but, as stated above, how can any of us presume to know what the motivations and goals are of these individuals?


You can not count Hedlund for example because he had only one shot for stardom (which is Tron) which was not good but it was not so bad and there's a potential. Since he picks up interesting projects – On the Road (in which he was good), Llewyn Davis and upcoming Mojave and film with Amy Adams. I put my money for him.

Farrell and Owen are also no good choice. The played various roles films of various quality to be honest but still they are both good actors.

I would also add Gerald Butler to this list.

As for Worthington, Kitsch, Walker, Lautner – they are all just terrible actors. The paradox with Worthington that he turned out to be B-class actor who has a contract to star in most profitable project ever. So he'll receive he's next chance soon.

But my main objection to this artcle is that I don't see the point. Maybe some actors are just don't want to be "stars". Ryan Gosling, for instance, had all the cards to do it after "The Notebook" but prefered to go indie.


Where's Eric Bana? Seriously he has had more high profile projects with big directors which flatlined than anyone on the list.

The lack of actresses on the list is also suspect.


Great list.

Pretty White Actor #6439

What a diverse array of actors who really stand out from the crowd. I'm shocked that Hollywood is treating them like they're all bland and interchangeable 18-34 year old pretty white actors.


How was Oliver Stone's ALEXANDER in any way shape or form a "tentpole"? It was an Oliver Stone movie.


Why is Jamie Fox Not on the list.


Colin Farrell doesn't belong on this list. He is a character actor (and a good one at that).
I feel sorry for Taylor Lautner. His team did him a disservice trying to make him an action star before he was ready. He should had done small ensemble films and took acting lesson.
I'm glad Alex Pettyfer never happened. The guy is a douche.

Mr. Maass

"And so the kind of fame that Dorff and Hollywood were so convinced was coming never arrived. He had some colorful moments: Mary Harron's "I Shot Andy Warhol," John Waters' "Cecil B. Demented," and Guillermo del Toro's "Blade…"

Pretty sure Guillermo had nothing to do with the first Blade.


So by posting one woman are you saying that actresses all hit the big time or its just about the boys? I mean really. What was the point of the token female.


This is a good article, I think about this a lot (artists who are pushed by the people with money but the public rejects them). I'd add to the runners-up: Eric Bana, Hayden Christensen, Garrett Hedlund, and I think Armie Hammer might unfortunately be on there soon. Ethan Hawke always seemed borderline…

And to some other commenters: this article is about people who were NEVER accepted by the public on their own terms. So Johnny Depp, Will Smith and Tom Cruise don't count because they've sustained long careers based on their names, they're just not hot right now. Same goes for Vince Vaughn.


F*ckin Jim Sturgess!

Ray H

I think Jake Gyllenhaal should be on this list, but "End of Watch" probably made enough on a paltry budget to grant him a reprieve.


Ryan Reynolds and Colin Farrell do not belong on the same list as Alex Pettycash and Taylor Kitchy; Reynolds and Farrell are at least two steps up the star ladder from the other bozos. Sam Worthington seems like a nice enough fellow, but he flat out sucks.

Brian Boyle

The problem is revealed in the title…, HOLLYWOOD tried to push these otherwise fine actors on the public, but Hollywood seems to have either 1) swallowed whole its own b.s. machine, or 2) forgotten that they can't MAKE a star…, the public has to discover an actor and THEN anoint him or her a star. People might — might! — buy prefabricated, manufactured hype for a very short while, but then they get hip, get wise and drop the "next big thing" like a hot potato. The discovery and subsequent anointing and ascension have to be purely organic, or it will never work…, ten-plus cases in point.


Eric Bana?


For the majority of these actors, the description of "a likable presence" combined with a chiseled exterior simply doesn't cut it when combined with arrogance, drug/alcohol use, and taking for granted ones own worth in the face of minimal at best talent not being developed. When you are used to being loved for nothing, it is hard to get loved for something. About the only one who I can see making a successful return is Sam Worthington.


Will Smith is not on the Vanity Fair Hollywood 1999 cover with Skeet Ulrich. Not sure where you got that idea


Tom Cruise, Hayden Christensen, and Armie Hammer should grace this list. Oh yeah, and Shia Lebaoufufufuf needs to be on here.


Julia Ormond.

Hollywood gave her a big push in 1994/1995, but the public never warmed to her. The New York Times Magazine actually put her on the cover at the time. The headline was something like "Julia Ormond's Trip Through The Hollywood Star Machine", while the even more knowing title of the article inside was "The Conception, Production and Distribution of Julia Ormond".

She's a gifted actress and has found her place as a successful character actress, but she got a push as big as anyone on this list.


And apparently prior to the late 90s, Hollywood either didn't try to push actors into beng the next big thing, or was successful in all of its attempts.


"The 'Terminator' picture was actually released six months ahead of it and while it didn't perform badly, few were particularly enthusiastic about the movie, or the actor's turn as secret robot Marcus Wright."

That's not what I remember AT ALL.

Worthington was appreciated by most of film loving fellows I knew in that lousy Terminator film, stealing the scene away from the shouting leading-man Christian Bale.


Colin Farrel does not belong to this list with the likes of Taylor Lautner. He's more than proved himself to be a trustworthy character actor, not afraid of working with all kinds of auteurs and playing against type. Who the fuck cares if he didn't become the next Tom Cruise?

We got a quality actor instead. Much better.


Great list, nice Shout on Skeet, I love that man.


So with the exception of Gretchen Mol, all the women Hollywood pushed actually became stars?


Hayden Christiensen was given a huge push in the mid to late 2000's. His last film was in 2010….


I loved this article. I think Armie Hammer is about to make this list if he has one more dud after Mirror Mirror and Lone Ranger. And personally I always wanted Emile Hirsch to become more popular but after Speed Racer I feel he's had his chance.


del Toro directed "Blade II," not "Blade."


Shia LaBeouf???


"Attempts At The Big Time" YEAH, RIGHT


What about Garrett Hedlund?


Way to try to stir up shit for hits you guys. Class acts all around.


These guys either have no acting talent or essentially no charisma. Ryan Reynolds is good-looking but at best a mediocre actor that has one note: glib smart-ass.


Hilarious …. that shit abouDeadpool NEVER (fucking – EVER …. just to punch it home) going to happen! Well, turns out Ryan Reynolds DID get to make Deadpool, it happened, it was huge, and it propelled him back into super stardom (if you actually believed he’d left in the first place). I love when some hack writes an article about ‘x’ and is a know-it-all about everything (I.e – has their own shit opinion) and makes claims that are then either easily refuted or, with a little time, become the opposite! Why in Gods name would you ever (EVER) have been so sure about something that everyone knew WOULD happen someday …. it was just a matter of time and things lining up. Very solvable. Most of us knew that we’d get Deadpool at some point – everyone except you apparently!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *