Telluride Roundups: Oscar Hopefuls ’12 Years a Slave’ and ‘Prisoners’ Score with Critics (TRAILERS)

Telluride Roundups: Oscar Hopefuls '12 Years a Slave' and 'Prisoners' Score with Critics (TRAILERS)

As Telluride Film Festival co-director Gary Meyer reminded at the opening day press conference, he and co-directors Tom Luddy and Julie Huntsinger like to stay away from the word “world premiere.” But they do in fact book them and it seems that the Telluride Oscar record is so good that more and more studios and indies are bringing films here as well as Venice and Toronto and New York. In fact, Cannes entries “All is Lost,” “Inside Llewyn Davis” and “Nebraska” are skipping Toronto on their way to New York. So I made sure to see them here. (More later.)
Paramount’s Jason Reitman romance “Labor Day” debuted Thursday, while two unannounced big films made a big splash Friday: Warner Bros. awards hopeful “Prisoners,” which nabbed rave reviews for Hugh Jackman and Jake Gyllenhaal and Fox Searchlight’s “12 Years a Slave,” directed by Steve McQueen. Alfonso Cuaron’s “Gravity,” which we reviewed in Venice, will play Saturday night. Weinstein Co. was planning to bring “Philomena,” which scored well in Venice (our TOH! review), but will unveil their Salinger documentary instead.
Starring Chiwetel Ejiofor as a free black Northerner abducted and sold into slavery, “12 Years a Slave” is director Steve McQueen’s followup to the elegant, if cold, art films “Hunger” (2008) and “Shame” (2011), which both premiered at Telluride. Searchlight is launching its Academy Awards campaign here. The lavish cast includes McQueen mainstay Michael Fassbender, Paul Giamatti, Paul Dano, Sarah Paulson and Quvenzhane Wallis. A roundup of reviews of “12 Years” below, and “Prisoners” and trailers after the jump.
For all McQueen’s considerable skills as a filmmaker, “12 Years” would not succeed without Ejiofor’s incredible turn.  In this day in age it may be hard to believe why a free man wouldn’t run for his life or fight to his last breath in Northup’s circumstances. Ejiofor makes history palatable as he captures Northup’s desire to survive as well as his despair as the weight of his plight increases over time.
Based on Solomon Northup’s 1853 bestseller, “12 Years a Slave” owes much to Ejiofor’s knockout performance. But it’s a particularly noteworthy advancement in McQueen’s already impressive filmography, as it funnels the cerebral formalism of his earlier features (the prison strike drama “Hunger” and the sex addict portrait “Shame”) into a deeply involving survival narrative. As a result, “Slave” injects its topic with immediacy.
The first thing fans of McQueen’s “Hunger” and “Shame” will notice here is the degree to which the helmer’s austere formal technique has evolved — to the extent that one would almost swear he’d snuck off and made three or four films in the interim. Composition, sound design and story all cut together beautifully, and yet, there’s no question that “12 Years a Slave” remains an art film, especially as the provocative director forces audiences to confront concepts and scenes that could conceivably transform their worldview.

McQueen’s previous two films — “Hunger” (2008), which is about a hunger striker, and “Shame” (2011), which is about a sex addict — both also debuted at Telluride. And like them, “Twelve Years” is an extremely dark and disturbing work that will almost certainly resonate more with critics than the general public. But unlike those earlier two films, which received a grand total of zero Oscar nominations, this one, because of its larger historical canvas and the magnificent performances from its giant ensemble cast, will almost certainly resonate more with the Academy.

As for McQueen’s work, advance chatter had some wondering whether he had what it took to make a mainstream entertainment his third time around, but there won’t be much questioning of that after doubters see “12 Years a Slave.” It has the strokes you’d expect out of a studio picture but also some moments few other directors would have attempted, like an agonizingly beautiful sequence in which Solomon literally tip-toes his way through a near-hanging that goes on for several silent minutes.

A roundup of reviews of “Prisoners” after the jump.

Starring Hugh Jackman and Jake Gyllenhaal in, word has it, career best performances, “Prisoners,” the English language debut of Oscar nommed “Incendies” director Denis Villeneuve, floored audiences upon its Telluride debut. Like Clint Eastwood’s “Mystic River” (2003) — says Variety scribe Scott Foundas in his superlative review — this 2 1/2 hour thriller dwells in big themes and a sprawling cast. Uniformly superb costars include Paul Dano, Maria Bello, Viola Davis, Terrence Howard and Melissa Leo, in an evidently not-so-showy performance that’s garnering acclaim. But will audiences take to this dark and disturbing crime story when it hits theaters September 20 via Warner Bros.?
A first-rate ensemble procedural with weighty themes to spare, Quebecois director Denis Villeneuve’s tense kidnapping drama “Prisoners” revolves around a familiar set of genre ingredients but lays them out with expert precision. Similar to Villeneuve’s Oscar-nominated “Incendies,” the director’s first entirely English language feature involves a high stakes investigation and a generation-sprawling mystery only made fully clear in its closing scenes, but the comparisons stop there.
With each successive revelation, Guzikowski’s brilliant script satisfies the necessary machinations while always flowing effortlessly from his vivid, multi-dimensional characters. That delicate balance extends to Villeneuve’s direction, which maintains a vise-like grip on the viewer without ever resorting to cheap shock effects or compromising the integrity of the human drama. Yet this is also a film that breathes, that knows it has the audience in its palm and can take time out for the kind of incidental, character-deepening scenes that usually end up on the cutting-room floor.
Jackman roars with a Wolverine-like rage and intensity in frustration at the ineffectuality of the police working his daughter’s case, but there’s an authentic, emotionally connected and anguished howl to his pain that he could never access with Logan. Like “Incendies” before it, “Prisoners” is emotionally draining as the family, the detectives and everyone involved is put through the wringer, but it’s an all-consuming ride that’s ultimately compelling, if not slightly exhausting.
As the plot twists multiply and tension mounts, the film reaches a climax that is satisfying without being predictable.  Special praise should go to the sound engineer for a shrewd touch in the very last scene that brings the story to an absolutely perfect conclusion.  “Prisoners” can at times be a hard film to watch, but thanks to all the talent involved, it’s even harder to shake off.
The ensemble is great across the board but Hugh Jackman gives what honestly might be his best performance as one of the desperate fathers willing to do whatever it takes to find his daughter. Jake Gyllenhaal is also perfectly utilized, carving out a law enforcement character caught between the robotics of the job and the emotion of the case. And also worth noting is Terrence Howard as the other father; he doesn’t get a whole lot to do here, but he makes it all count and, along with his work in “Lee Daniels’ The Butler,” seems to be back on the right track.

This Article is related to: Festivals and tagged , , , , , , ,


Comments

L.D.

Tidbits that Anne Thompson and Ryan Lattanzio "forgot" to mention:

The Hollywood Reporter: "Gyllenhaal is also playing a troubled character, a suspicious loner who nonetheless has a strong desire to help people in need, and he wins our sympathy for this dogged detective without in any way idealizing the character."

IndieWire: "Of course, the movie also contains a literal connection to Fincher's movie in form of Gyllenhaal, who does some of the finest, most controlled work since his similar role there."

IndieWire – The Playlist: "While Jackman is more than genuine as the father driven to the ends of his frayed tether to find his daughter — and a few particular scenes with his son are heartbreakingly emotional — it’s Gyllenhaal as the in-his-world, indefatigable detective that takes over as the heart of the movie in the end with an impassioned but controlled tenacity that never asks to be applauded as heroic."

Variety: "Loki, we are told, has never failed to solve a case, though this is at odds with the man’s solemn demeanor, his haunted gaze and the elaborate tattoos jutting out from his collar suggesting reserves of private rage. Compare this to the eager-beaver murder sleuth Gyllenhaal played in David Fincher’s “Zodiac” and the full breadth of his impressive range immediately comes into focus."

Jamie

Nice to see the Melissa Leo mention. I knew there was a reason she wasn't being seen in the trailers. It is an a great role that only a great actress could handle well. I hope it puts her among the Sup Actress nominees.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *