Is Vince Vaughn Asset or Liability on ‘Delivery Man’? (EARLY REVIEW ROUNDUP)

Is Vince Vaughn Asset or Liability on 'Delivery Man'? (EARLY REVIEW ROUNDUP)

Judging from the early reviews below, DreamWorks’ “Delivery Man” is not your usual Vince Vaughn entry. The question is what risk DreamWorks took casting the toxic comedian in Ken Scott’s earnest redo of his sperm donor comedy “Starbuck,” as Vaughn has burned many smart moviegoers over the years. (And some of these reviews are negative.) Variety says the actor reveals his softer side in this movie about what it means to be a parent. DreamWorks is upbeat about the film’s chances for a Golden Globe comedy nomination. Check out the reviews below. 

Variety:

In the 17 years since “Swingers,” Vince Vaughn has
cultivated the comedic persona of an obnoxious and insensitive boor, so it may
come as a surprise to learn that “Delivery Man” reveals a softer side entirely.
As David Wozniak, the world’s most fertile sperm donor, the star plays someone who’s
overwhelmed as opposed to merely overwhelming. It’s a welcome change, though a
significant marketing challenge as well, considering DreamWorks has almost no
way of letting audiences know that “Delivery Man” is virtually nothing like a
Vince Vaughn movie, but rather a heartfelt celebration of the act of parenthood
presented under radically exaggerated circumstances.

The Hollywood Reporter:

Thanks to some potent performances, led by Vince Vaughn in a
decidedly change-of-pace, reflective turn, this Disney release proves lightly
entertaining in spite of its more heartfelt tendencies.

The Wrap:

Writer-director Ken Scott, who also made the original film,
writes himself in circles to keep the whole plot deception going, to the point
where it seems David’s only reason to remain anonymous is that, now that news
of the lawsuit has hit the media, there’s public ridicule of “Starbuck” as a
chronic masturbator. And the whole owing-money-to-mobsters subplot, which only
rarely even comes up, gets settled so lickety-split you might miss the
resolution during a popcorn run.

Corn is all you’re getting from “Delivery Man,”
unfortunately, and it’s a particularly stale batch.

Examiner:

I don’t have a nice way to say this, Vince. For the next 90+
minutes, Delivery Man continuously goes on to shovel the sloppiest, most useless,
and fakest syrup of self-gratifying and self-serving sludge this side of every
single Adam Sandler movie for the past decade and even a few of the bad
late-90’s Robin Williams saccharin-stuffed trainwrecks. The movie is Click bad.
This movie is Jack bad. This movie rivals Patch Adams for manufactured
emotional garbage. I’m sorry to say it, bro, but your new movie is terrible.
You’re going to win the award of “worst film of the year” from this
website twice in a row.

This Article is related to: Reviews and tagged , , , , , ,


Comments

Kiki

I ended up watching Starbuck last year when it was out in the UK and was pleasantly surprised, it was sweet and very funny. There was something about Patrick Huard that made the character very lovable. I can't imagine Vince Vaughan making this movie anything but painful to watch and unfunny. I still haven't gotten over The Internship, I don't think I can handle him twice in one year.

Eric

Not to be "that guy" but just as a quick correction "Starbuck" was also a fictional comedy, not a documentary. (Referring to the description "sperm donor doc 'Starbuck,'")

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *