Back to IndieWire

Thor: The Dark World

Thor: The Dark World

I can’t predict what Marvel fans will make of the second
movie showcasing Thor, the Norse hero with the mighty hammer. It lacks the
heavy-handedness of the first film, thank goodness, and tries to retain some of
its loopy humor (involving modern-day earthlings played by Natalie Portman,
Stellan Skarsgård, and Kat Dennings), but the whole thing feels like an excuse
for a movie rather than a story that begged to be told.

It seems that years ago the Dark Elves, led by Malekith
(Christopher Eccleston), threatened the kingdom of Asgard, and while they were
vanquished a small band of survivors still lurk in the wings. And who should discover
their long-dormant weapon, a deadly vapor, than Portman in modern-day London?
(Why are she and her scientific friends in London? Don’t ask.) This crisis
summons Thor to rescue her and the game is on.

The breakout star of the first movie, who truly came into
his own in Joss Whedon’s The Avengers,
is Tom Hiddleston as Thor’s wicked and vengeful half-brother Loki. Fittingly, he
gets all the best moments in The Dark
, and the actor clearly relishes the way his character enjoys being
evil. This makes the resolution of the story somewhat inscrutable, not to
mention illogical. I dare not reveal any of the details.

Chris Hemsworth is appropriately hunky, Anthony Hopkins is
royally grumpy, and other actors like Idris Elba, Rene Russo, and Ray Stevenson
do what they can with two-dimensional material. For Marvel fans who love being
immersed in that universe, the mere presence of these characters, along with a
plethora of visual effects and action may be enough. For me, Thor: The Dark World lacks originality
and purpose. One delicious character does not justify a lumbering spectacle.

This Article is related to: Reviews and tagged , , , , , ,


Ted Whitney

I personally haven't seen this movie yet, though I certainly plan on seeing it soon, but I would like to say this: before people start getting too unenthused by such a film as this, perhaps we should just think of Thor as one of the three appetizers that come before the meal… if you catch my drift. Judging from the previous Avengers film, we should only be more excited by what a feast it will be. Just food for thought.

Stephen Ledesma

It simply did what a comic book film is supposed to do…it entertained the audience. No more, no less. There was enthusiastic applause which I added to as the film came to an end. It was certainly much better than "Iron Man 3"…what a revoltin' development THAT was! Some times these reviewers simply need to put down the magnifying glass and just lay back and enjoy the movie.


Hard to believe they couldn't come up with a better story line after the hundreds/thousands of terrific comics put out by Kirby/Sinnott…Nuff said"…

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *