‘Gravity’ Set to Dominate Oscar Craft Nominations: Talking the Film’s Sound, Music and Editing

'Gravity' Set to Dominate Oscar Craft Nominations: Talking the Film's Sound, Music and Editing

As we approach Wednesday’s Oscar voting deadline, at least one thing’s certain: “Gravity” will dominate the craft nominations. And rightly so for the creative and innovative contributions. We’ve already covered production designcinematography, and VFX in depth, so now let’s look at the corresponding design for sound and music, which was perfect for the immersive Dolby Atmos surround experience, along with the editing of what was essentially an animated movie.

“Gravity” is all about transmitting sound through vibration and following Sandra Bullock in space. Who will ever forget the sound of her breath or heartbeat; her fiddling with the Hubble telescope or the crashing debris that provides ongoing jeopardy?

“Gravity” contains the most complex spatial direction in recent memory, thanks to the work of supervising sound editor/sound designer Glenn Freemantle and re-recording mixer Skip Lievsay, among others. Voices and other sounds constantly change in relation to Bullock’s POV.

“Space sound can’t be transmitted through atmosphere but through other elements,” Freemantle explains. “We came up with the idea of vibration through touch and when she’s in contact we hear it through her [as a muffled sound].”People picked up on this straight away. The concept works and it doesn’t distract from the beauty of space when a barrage of things happen. We did research of what tools they used and how they used them. We recorded vibrations using contact mics at General Motors and medical plants. We tried to be as real as we could using signal bases, and we had space suits as well with all the gear when we were shooting it. We tried to have a contact within her suit.

“Actually, the sound never stops moving around. We contact Ed Harris, the voice of the commander, who’s on Earth in mission control. And if you listen to it every time, there’s a geography to the way sound moves. It’s like a road map. And there are rules. Even when you go into her helmet, and the whole thing opens up like a magic life support machine around her, the spectrum of sounds move with her. The theater becomes her helmet and you are inside that. It’s claustrophobic, like theater, evoking the experience of being there with her.”

Atmosphere filtration inside the Russian space station moves as well. When Bullock gets inside the station, she takes off her suit and gets in the fetal position. It’s a beautiful moment, encapsulating everything from sound to music. She comes in and first turns the air on; the helmet comes off and there’s the air release; and all the sound rushes back in crystal clear. It’s like life, getting into the womb. 

And the sound design profoundly influenced Steven Price’s eerie score as well. “We worked very closely so that we weren’t trying to do battle, Freemantle adds. “He used vibrations as well in place of percussion and we used filtered stuff, radio signals sometimes. We did it in a scientific way. Sometimes we would underscore the music with some subsonic base that you don’t actually hear but you feel. The dynamics between the two makes it more exciting.”

Price says the music needed to have an expanded role in keeping with sounds coming through vibrations. And Cuaron wanted to express sounds through tonal means as well as through music, so the sound became part of the composing process. The director also insisted that there be no percussion.

“The early cues were the hardest and took the longest time,” Price suggests. “How do you compose an action score when all of the conventions of action scoring have been removed and there’s no sound to compete with? We did a lot of experimentation with getting that intensity and trying to get the pacing right so you’re with her all the way. There’s a lot of layering in the score with the idea that it’s immersive. 

“The ‘Debris’ cue is the first time you get that and you hear all sorts of things that we recorded separately, and lots of elements I wrote to fly around you and to nudge you into her head almost. We blurred organic and electronic instrumentation so a lot of the sounds start out organically: glass harmonica, pipe organ, and textures that derive from breathing or low voices. 

“But everything was processed after recording, including the orchestral elements, which could be moved around throughout the surround speakers. I might record one line and then another so they could follow the movement of the characters. For instance, as Sandra falls, the string line would fall with her and it might meet something that was coming in. It was all designed around the choreography of the characters.”

For co-editor Mark Sanger (who previously served as VFX editor on Cuaron’s “Children of Men”), his impact began early. He joined the project in pre-production four years ago, helping the director build on his initial vision. They had a complete cut of the movie in animation 18 months before Bullock and George Clooney arrived, which they screened for Warner Bros., with temp sound and music, and Sanger and his assistant, Tanya Clark, standing in for the two stars. 

The camera was rarely locked to any spatial plane so it was a challenge to make the cuts work within the right geography. But the cyclical process with Cuaron and Framestore, the VFX company, allowed for changes in blocking that inevitably occurred. Sanger spent hours or days re-editing the rest of the scene to achieve the proper balance, continuity, and rhythm.

“It’s not often that the editor gets to work collaboratively with all of the other guys at the very beginning of the design process in pushing the film along,” Sanger admits. “For me, it was very exciting because there were decisions that we were making early on that would obviously change the script. We were all working together to get the best possible movie long before we were ever going to shoot it. 

“Once we could see how the structure of the film was coming about, then there came a point for several months where it was more of a technical process. And editorial decisions at that stage had financial implications. As an editor, you’re used to dealing with financial implications in post-production where you’ve got visual effects shots and figuring out how many you can use within a given sequence. 

“But we were having conversations about how we were going to shoot it, and whether it was physically possible for us to deliver the actors’ performances within the confines of the shots we were putting together. And so it was a unique situation, but then there came a point after about 18 months when the actors arrived and it blossomed into a creative process. And those were the times when you got a burst of enthusiasm after working on a cut with a lot of featureless previs for so long.”

They certainly delivered a unique blockbuster spectacle with emotional resonance beyond anyone’s expectations.

This Article is related to: Interviews and tagged , , , , , , , ,


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *