You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Point/Counterpoint Review: ‘Edge Of Tomorrow’ Starring Tom Cruise, Emily Blunt And Bill Paxton

Point/Counterpoint Review: 'Edge Of Tomorrow' Starring Tom Cruise, Emily Blunt And Bill Paxton

Masks have always fascinated Tom Cruise. There are masks in “Minority Report,” “Eyes Wide Shut,” and “Vanilla Sky,” and they serve a key purpose in all four “Mission: Impossible” movies (movies, it just so happens, that Cruise also produces). In films like “Interview with the Vampire,” “Valkyrie” and “Tropic Thunder,” Cruise transforms himself physically with the help of advanced prosthetics, to the point that these augmented bits become a part of him; he is the mask. It’s very apparent that Tom Cruise is obsessed with the idea of being anyone but Tom Cruise. This idea reaches its logical zenith in his latest movie, the brilliant sci-fi extravaganza “Edge of Tomorrow,” in which Cruise plays a man who dies on the battlefield and is instantly reborn. Every day, Cruise could be someone else. The fact that he chooses to be himself is what’s really impressive.

Tellingly, Cruise’s character Major William Cage is introduced as a spin doctor, a military man in name only who, before Earth became engaged in combat with a bloodthirsty alien race, was a marketing executive. His main goal is to package the war and sell it to the citizenry, but when he runs afoul of a European commander (Brendan Gleeson), he’s labeled a deserter and forced into combat even when, he readily admits, he can barely handle the trauma of a paper cut. Even before battle, he’s been transformed. On his inaugural mission, which echoes the D-Day beach invasion, his squad is slaughtered and, while attempting to kill one of the monsters (a deadly swirl of teeth and tentacles conjured up by the wizards at Industrial Light & Magic), he ingests some of its blood. This gives him the nifty, “Groundhog Day“-like ability to “reset” the day every time he dies.   

Once he foggily realizes what is happening to him, Cage seeks out Rita Vrataski (Emily Blunt), a warrior who had some success during one of these battles and, for a spell, had similar abilities. She teaches him how to use his gift, and together they plot a way to end the invasion, once and for all.

It’s hard to talk about “Edge of Tomorrow” without accidentally giving something away, so if you’re squeamish about spoilers, feel free to turn back now (just be sure to return after you’ve seen the movie). Before you go, you should know that the movie is great. Like really, really great. It’s snappy and funny and violent and weird and sets the bar impossibly high for the rest of this year’s summer movie crop.

Based on a Japanese “light novel” called “All You Need Is Kill” by Hiroshi Sakurazaka, “Edge of Tomorrow” uncannily brings together a bunch of different influences, from old school video games (reset!) to Japanese anime (the character wear hulking, robotic suits in battle) to the science fiction films of Dutch director Paul Verhoeven (early scenes have a typically satirical vibe and the battle scenes feel very “Starship Troopers“) while also feeling totally fresh and original. It’s weird to think of a movie that had this much money put behind its marketing and distribution as a surprise, but it really is; a very welcome surprise.

Part of what makes the movie so thrilling is its formal experimentalism, gleefully exhibited inside the parameters of a $200 million studio film. The movie was directed by Doug Liman, who made independent fare like “Swingers” before earning his living as a craftsman behind some of Hollywood’s biggest action films (like “Mr. & Mrs. Smith” and “Jumper“), and in a way “Edge of Tomorrow” feels much closer in spirit to his tiny indie “Go” than something like “The Bourne Identity.” It has the same freewheeling energy as “Go,” as well as the emphasis on being unmoored from typical narrative convention. In “Edge of Tomorrow,” the same events happen again and again, but Liman is able, somehow, to show us different things each time. It’s like if “Rashomon” featured a bunch of men in robotic suits and giant scary monsters and Bill Paxton as a hard-nosed general (he’s great, by the way).

What’s even more impressive than Liman’s novel approach to the execution of the narrative is that he’s able to give Cruise’s plight actual emotional weight, utilizing a minimal amount of dialogue. Interestingly enough this is accomplished mostly through the editing of the movie, as you watch Cruise start to understand Emily Blunt’s character fully. She is first portrayed, both by her performance and the marketing surrounding her victory, as a fierce warrior. But as time goes on and Cruise continues to work with her through the restarting of the day, he notices that she has layers and, what’s more, that he is starting to fall for her. She is a rich, beautifully realized female character, strong and smart and sensitive, which is already a welcome change from the summer movies we’ve seen thus far, where women are mostly seen falling from tall buildings and hiding from giant monsters. Blunt doesn’t hide from monsters: she’s sticks a really big fucking sword through them.

But the movie belongs, wholeheartedly, to Cruise. This is his liveliest, most fully engaged, dimensional performance in years, and considering the entire movie hinges on the audience identifying with his character as he goes through this patently unreal experience, that’s a very good thing. Cruise starts off superficial and scared, a man unwilling to enter combat because of his lack of self-confidence and physical ability. By being able to replay the day, though, he becomes stronger, faster, and is able to anticipate what is going to happen next. He also starts to feel more. As an actor you sense Cruise letting go of some of the unnecessary artifice that has hindered recent performances like “Rock of Ages.” He is letting go of the mask and becoming more human, and because of all this it’s a performance that winds up being close to transcendent. Tom Cruise is back. Big time.

And it’s weird to think of a $200 million sci-fi spectacle like “Edge of Tomorrow” flying below the radar, but with all the hype and hoopla about this summer’s superhero movies and animated sequels, that’s exactly what’s happened. It shouldn’t. “Edge of Tomorrow” is a witty, trippy, emotionally engaging, impressively strange movie, beautifully staged and photographed (by Dione Beebe). Most importantly though, is that “Edge of Tomorrow” is an outrageously fun thriller that sees the biggest actor of our age come back to vibrant life in a film that allows him to lose the mask and remind us all why he was a movie star in the first place. It’s a razzle-dazzle triumph, and one we can’t wait to experience again and again and again… [A-] – Drew Taylor. 

On page 2, a totally different take on the movie by Gabe Toro

Standards have changed in the blockbuster game. Computer generated effects have allowed us to realize just about anything we’ve ever seen or can imagine, and years of summer offerings have begun to bleed into each other, creating one summer blockbuster organism where we see the same visuals in different movies, the same ideas with the same people in the same places. Somewhere floating in this mélange is “Edge of Tomorrow,” a generic programmer that has absolutely no reason to exist beyond pushing the brand of Tom Cruise, Still Youthful 50-Year-Old Action Hero.

Cruise is Major Bill Cage, a soldier who has strenuously avoided active duty by becoming a PR rep for the armed forces in the face of an intergalactic war. His camera-ready delivery and networking skills have got him far, as have his questionable professional ethics. That is, until he attempts to blackmail his way out of a dangerous assignment, and a vengeful general (Brendan Gleeson, disinterested) instead puts him on the front lines, informing Sgt. Farrell (Bill Paxton) that Cage is meant for combat. Despite his infamous gift of gab, Cage is unwillingly strapped into a futuristic mecha suit and sent into battle.

But Cage and his fellow soldiers are engulfed by a kamikaze attack by the aliens, referred to as Mimics. These faceless enemies attack from above and below, amorphous globules with cybernetic tendrils that strike with intense fury. The movie’s best sequences are at this beach, capturing the speed and ferocity of actual war, the feeling that luck is the only thing keeping you alive, that death is sudden and entirely without drama. And, during this skirmish, Cage dies quite horribly.

But he gets better! Cage wakes back on the base, where Sgt. Farrell once again introduces himself. Cage is once again bullied and deployed, where he once again experiences a violent demise. Soon, Cage realizes that he’s stuck in a loop, destined to keep returning to that same day, to live a thousand lives, die a thousand deaths. The secret to mastering this code lies in Rita Vrataski, a guileless soldier who apparently has also experienced this loop, and lived on to outlast it. Conveniently, she looks like Emily Blunt.

Cruise’s name used to mean a certain level of quality control. He didn’t mind working with ambitious directors, and he didn’t mind trusting that they would subvert his image, on the way to making him the biggest movie star in the world. In recent years he’s gotten sloppier, more desperate in his choice of material. Failing to note his accelerated age isn’t an issue, per se: but trusting subpar material because of how it lionizes him does seem to be a common trait in Cruise’s recent filmography. A glimpse at his body of work reveals an artist in significant creative decline, and “Edge of Tomorrow” just might be the most shallow and disposable film he’s ever starred in.

You see it in Vrataski, who is meant to be one of Hollywood’s rare showy roles for a female in a male-dominated genre. She helps Cage master the loop and find the secret of the Mimics, but she’s clearly there to run backup, despite being a career soldier compared to Cage’s camera-ready opportunist. Soon, Vrataski is being deceived by Cage as to how many times he’s died, visited her, and gone on adventures. Having been trapped in the same loop, she should understand the potential power trip that sort of experience has on someone. Instead, a subtle transferal of power forces Vrataski into the backseat of the narrative. It’s unclear what’s worse: the blockbuster that pretends women aren’t capable, or the one that disingenuously celebrates their talents before quietly shuttering them to the background. Perhaps we should be thankful that she’s never kidnapped.

Casting Cruise as a handsome face completely under-equipped for war is something of a commentary on the cushy position of the modern movie star, protected from the physicality of their predecessors thanks to strenuous stunt preparation and special effects. But the movie’s moral equivalence is suspect, casting a negative eye towards Cage for not wanting to fight as if wars were about either soldiering up, or cowering in fear. It’s an easy sentiment when your enemy is made up of anonymous creepy crawlies from another dimension that won’t accept reason, and the movie insists that becoming a soldier (and then a better soldier) improves Cage as a human being. Within the idea of a soldier constantly being shoved into war zones to die repeatedly until they simply learn better, there’s a chance to critique the government and the military-industrial complex. But Cage isn’t storming the beach because of an edict from high above, but because he’s a jerk and a petty general dislikes him. And it’s never clear exactly what government is being served: Cage’s central-casting fellow soldiers have various accents, but the movie takes place just outside of England. So what is this thing even about?

It’s not about anything, ultimately. As soon as Cruise straps into that mecha, you know he’s going to master this strange technology. Hell, you can even guess that the mecha suits (an absurdly clunky weapon that seems to vary in size and comfort) will eventually be ditched, because a technological villain needs to be defeated by an analog hero. Doug Liman (“The Bourne Identity”) delivers a competent, workmanlike vision that provides a few early cheap thrills, but by the literally and figuratively soggy third act, you get the sense that everyone is just punching the clock. “Edge of Tomorrow” is ultimately so barren of ideas that it feels like an anti-movie, just another day at work for one of the world’s biggest stars and his generous enablers. Cage’s time-loop ends up being indicative of this movie’s placement in the summer movie pantheon: same shit, different day. [D]



This Article is related to: Reviews and tagged , , , , , , ,


Comments

steprock

I found this film to be insightful, interesting, and exciting. If you want more than that, read a book.

As for the assertion that Blunt's character is somehow shoved into the background, it's absurd! In stark contrast to the review, she does, in fact, figure out she's being played and pushes back. She takes the reins back when she gets shoved into the background.

I, for one, found the changing pace of the film to be even more engaging. They didn't stick with running and gunning, but found some real depth and heart by the middle point. I didn't mind in the least that it ended with mono e mono faceoff. What else do you expect in an action movie? I paid good money to see stuff blow up and this delivers. The fact that it includes intelligence and an interesting plot made my week.

Segolene

It's become popular to bash Tom Cruise. You know, someone who has been a major movie star for 30 years, he ain't worth shit. Gosh, we love to bash successful people. You know how hard it is to remain on the top of the Hollywood pile for so long?

People did the same thing to Clint Eastwood. "He's over, he's over!" they all shouted, then Pale Rider, Unforgiven, etc.

I saw this movie last night and I'm going to see it again. Great performances by Cruise, actual BLACK people in it doing normal things and even in positions of power over Cruise's character, and a really wonderful woman character in the center of it.

Bitch all you want about his personal life, but TC is back with this one, haters.

Max

Looks somebody wants attentions…

Fernando

#Corrections

"and Bill Paxton as a hard-nosed general (he's great, by the way)."

No… he is a Master Sergeant

Jamie

I've been holding off seeing this film and will probably wait for it to come out on cable. This is for one simple reason: I really dislike the acting style (if you want to call it acting) of Tom Cruise. I realize this is totally prejudicial, but even with what are considered his best movies or ones that I have liked, I've liked in spite of him not because of him and this one just feels like more of the ho hum same.

harry

Gabe you fkta***rd… You are the new Armond White. You are still upset over your disappointing film career. Its been years. Get over it.

Travis

Great reviews both, but on Gabe's side it's interesting that he thinks the film looks down on Cage for "not wanting to fight". No, he's looked down on because he tried to lie and blackmail his way out of fighting.

Zinjo

Interesting takes for both reviews. I am not sure what Gabe was so caustic about though… Maybe he was one of the many who gushed over LOTR when I found it rather bland, but interesting having never read the books. I was amused when Gage went off on how the co-star (supporting character) was not given equal screen time as the star (protagonist). If Vrataski were the man character he'd have a point, but she isn't. Any further character development outside of the main narrative would be discarded as it should in any story.

Stephen Jay

Saw an early screening of this, and I find myself between Drew and Gabe. Somewhere around C or C+. It had its entertaining moments, but the last act was dull and predictable.

Emperor Zerg Rush

Hollywood's kick on trying to make Bill Paxton happen again is already getting stale.

cirkusfolk

I find it hard to believe such a varying difference exists over whether this film is good or not. After reading both reviews, I'm inclined to suspect the negative one had more of an issue with his perception of the film and the possible subtext. I just want it to be a cool and exciting movie. It's easily my most anticipated movie coming out this summer and even though I am pretty sure it will bomb box office wise, I'm hoping we at least have a good movie to enjoy.

Caleb

I knew you guys wouldn't have the balls to run an A- review of a contemporary Tom Cruise action movie.

Harry

Gabe's a r*tard. So didn't even bother to read his review. I'm sure Gabe has some scandalous info about The Playlist senior staff and he blackmails them to keep his job. Otherwise how can a talent less hack (more contrariant than Armond White) can write on a blog like this?

hank

did anyone expect Gabe Toro to like this? He hated it before he even saw the trailer.

Marko

Haha! I totally predicted that there was going to be a gushingly positive review from Drew Taylor and then a really negative one from someone else on staff.

Joao

I'm going with the positive one. I really want this to be a critical and financial success!

dave

I believe the your "Point" is the real review and i will take that way.

Tom

surely this is the same as 'Source Code' ?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *