Back to IndieWire

Review: ‘Obvious Child’ Succeeds Admirably as an Abortion Rom-Com

Review: 'Obvious Child' Succeeds Admirably as an Abortion Rom-Com

Last year, Lake Bell’s wonderful “In a World”
stuck to the conventional tenets of a romantic comedy while featuring the
feminist theme of a woman trying to make it in the sexist industry of trailer
voiceovers. This year, Gillian Robespierre’s equally winning
Obvious Child,” which bowed at Sundance and opens June 6 via A24, similarly sticks to the rom-com
arc while throwing in a gutsy curveball: The film’s main woman and man fall in
love while getting an abortion.

That main woman would be Donna (Jenny Slate, charismatic and
funny as hell), a twentysomething stand-up comedian, who cracks jokes about her
Jewish looks, flatulence and daily panty stains at a small Brooklyn dive bar.
She’s been dumped by her boyfriend, and is pickling in break-up booze when she
meets Max (Jake Lacy), a straight-arrow business student wearing the decidedly
non-Brooklyn attire of a crisp button-up and boat shoes. You probably know the
story from here: These two polar-opposite types hook up, she gets accidentally
pregnant, and it takes them several weeks of flirting and fighting to realize
they may mean more to each other than just a one-night stand.

Robespierre’s crisp direction and Slate’s infectious
personality would be enough to carry such a story even if those were its only
aspirations, but they opt for a different route. Donna realizes that — duh — having a baby at this point in her life would be fairly disastrous: She’s low
on income, low on interest in child-rearing, and low on the emotional maturity
needed to do so. Like many twentysomethings of the twenty-first century, Donna
is the obvious child of the title. So, with
little ado (but with some drawn-out difficulty telling Max), she goes for the abortion.

And now for an observation. In the instances that abortion
does make its way into romance-oriented films, it usually goes something like
this: 1) the leading lady gets pregnant, 2) the leading lady considers an
abortion, and then 3) the leading lady opts to keep the child. Thus such films
broach the “edgy” possibility of an abortion without actually sacrificing any
of the non-crowdpleasing effects that an abortion might have on the storyline.
(Jason Reitman and Diablo Cody’s “Juno” would be the salient example.)

So hats off to Robespierre and Slate. They’ve managed to
deliver a film with actual edge, which somehow retains the characteristics that
any successful romantic comedy should have: It’s heartwarming, romantic and
very funny (and, significantly, at no point do they downplay the emotional
ramifications an abortion can have on a woman). This is the type of
crowd-pleaser we could use more of.

This Article is related to: Reviews and tagged , , , , ,



Haha, well said. The irony of people that dense is amazing, no?


Your name really is Waldron isn’t it.


I’m very amazed how most reviews for this movie are so high and positive. In this review, they not only praise the film but also give kudos to making it edgy with the abortion theme. wtf? really? Is this where we stand as human beings. A young adult who is a regular drinker and lewd comedian has a drunken(fuzzy memory) one night stand with an almost stranger. She realizes she misses her period and then takes test to find she’s pregnant. Not only does she choose abortion in the movie, but it is an immediate decision. The only character that seemed to have a conscious was the asian doctor or nurse at the abortion office. How any review could give this film high ratings with such morally low characters(who all aid and help in this girl’s selfish decision) is beyond me. Though like many things in the world today, what can we do? I only hope someone reads this that will question the facts for themselves. Is life so worthless that we can afford to make drunk mistakes that must kill a living soul for are forgiveness and ease of mind?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *