TCM To Broadcast ‘Sanders of The Rivers’ w/Paul Robeson June 24 (A Problematic Film Indeed)

TCM To Broadcast ‘Sanders of The Rivers’ w/Paul Robeson June 24 (A Problematic Film Indeed)

Following up on Tambay’s piece on Paul Robeson and the need for a bio-pic about his life and career
(HERE
), comes news, perfect timing in fact, that Turner Classic Movies will broadcast Robeson’s 1935 British film, “Sanders of the River,” on Tuesday, June 24 at 11:30PM (10:30PM Central).

It was was a breakout film for Robeson in many

ways, though it clearly was not one that turned out the way he wanted, or even remotely liked. And despite his many legendary accomplishments in sports while in college, on the stage, in music and in political activism, it’s fair
to say that Robeson’s film career was not the greatest. And that’s not
just my own opinion. Robeson himself said on several occasions that his film
career was more disappointing than he would have liked.

Of the 13 films he made from 1925, to his last film in
1942, before giving up on films altogether, he went into most of them with the
best of intentions. But, they always fell into the usual trap of stereotypical
portrayals and clichés.

But of all his films, “Sanders of the River” stands out the
most. 

Produced and directed by the Alexander Korda and his brother Zoltan, who were the biggest and most important British filmmakers during the
1930’s and 40’s, Robeson agreed to make the film, because, as he was was quoted, “of a passionate concern with African culture.”

The film deals with a kind, benevolent white British
colonial offer named Sanders (played by Leslie
Banks) in Africa, and his troubles trying to keep the peace among various
African tribes, along with his right hand man Bosambo, played by Robeson.

However, the film was radically changed during
post-production, with re-shoots and new scenes added that were not in the original script, to
make the film more of a stirring, jingoistic tribute to British colonialism in Africa, making Robeson’s tribal chief leader in the film more subservient to the white Sanders character.

The film’s tone is set immediately just
after the opening credits, with the title card: “AFRICA – Tens of millions of natives under British rule, each tribe
with its own chieftain governed and protected by a handful of white men whose
everyday work is an unsung saga of courage and efficiency.”

After that, it’s pretty clear where the film is going. 

There are other troublesome things, such as Africans being called Sanders’
“black
children;” the film’s rather blatantly patronizing attitude; and, not to mention, of course, the usual stereotypes of Africans that would have comfortably fit right in a Tarzan movie.

In fact, Robeson reportedly walked out on the film at the
London premiere, and later tried to buy all existing prints of the film to
prevent it from being shown, but failed. Though he later said about “Sanders,” that
“the imperialist plot had been placed in the plot during the last days
five days of shooting…I was roped into the picture because I wanted to
portray the culture of the African people and I committed a faux pas which
convinced me that I had failed to weigh the problems of 150,000,000 native
Africans… I hate the picture.”

And yet how much of Robeson claiming that he had been
duped is true? Throughout the film, he constantly calls Sanders “Lord
Sandy” and twice sings a song in his honor, heralding him practically as lord
and master over all of Africa: “Sandy the Strong/Sandy the Wise/Righter of
wrongs/Hater of lies…”

In addition, there are some really groan-worthy lines that
Robeson says in the film, like: “Every time I have seen the beautiful face of your great King, my heart is filled
with joy.”

So while it is true that the film was changed during post-production, the fact of the matter is that Robeson is in several of the most embarrassing
and offensive scenes in it, so he can’t exactly claim ignorance.

However, one can argue, as some have, that Robeson’s performance
as Bosambo is actually more subversive in tone; That with a slight wink in his
eye and a sly underhanded smile, his character is actually “playing” with Sanders, manipulating him. Seemingly acting subservient and dutiful, he is actually, in a sort of Machiavellian way, using Sanders to gain his own power
over all the various tribes which he does get at the end. Looking at it that way does indeed make the film look a lot more interesting.

And there’s the curious addition of Nina Mae McKinney (the star of director King Vidor’s 1929 all black musical drama “Hallelujah,” who was the first real black female Hollywood star), playing Bosambo’s love interest and wife. The actress would quickly find out that there were no roles for her, and her appearance in “Sanders” did not result in the kind of breakthrough in her career that she hoped it would be. Although their first scene together, when Bosambo meets her, is terrific (pictured above), with some funny and even still current dialogue: 

– Robeson (with a lustful look in
his eyes): “Hey girl, what’s your name? Where do you come from?” 

– McKinney: “You wouldn’t
know the place. I’m from the coast.” 

– Robeson: “I know all about the coast” (with a
wicked grin on his face) “We can talk all about that later.”

Still, despite all its problems, it is Robeson who commands
the film from his first entrance, literally towering over everyone. One cannot deny
his sheer charisma and overpowering physical presence, When Robeson was on the
screen, Robeson was on the screen, if you understand what I mean.

And of course, there’s that voice – that magnificent, resonant, emotionally powerful voice. One
of the greatest singers ever; and Robeson does sing a few songs in the film, as every minute counts.

To hear for him yourself, here’s a clip of Robeson singing “Deep
River” from another British film titled “Pound Valley,”
made by Robeson in 1940, and perhaps one of the few films that he was most proud of.

A voice like his only comes once in a century:

This Article is related to: News and tagged ,


Comments

Blackman

Finally, your B. itch as@ wrote well.

+1

elaine

This is perfection!! Please do more! Could you possibly write a peice comparing 1930's and 2014 films, and how African Americans have been playing side characters/supporting character roles for decades?

parsyeb

Thank you for this well-written, detailed description of the film. This kind of writing on the net is rare because these retrospective pieces tend to either be too shallow or far too overbloated. This is like the bear bed Goldilocks settles on: just right.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *