Back to IndieWire

Can ‘Get On Up’ Star Chad Boseman Land a Best Actor Oscar Nomination?

Can 'Get On Up' Star Chad Boseman Land a Best Actor Oscar Nomination?

After the packed “Get On Up” Producers Guild of America screening Thursday at the Pacific Design Center, star Chadwick Boseman, who channels mercurial funk star James Brown in the musical biopic, earned a rousing standing ovation. And again he got another one at the Academy the following weekend. During the PGA Q & A, Oscar-winning producer Brian Grazer (Ron Howard’s “A Beautiful Mind”), explained that it took decades to get the $30-million period drama made, even after African-American biopic hits such as “Ray,” which won an Oscar for Jamie Foxx, and “42,” which launched Boseman as a rising star.

Universal eventually released the picture, insisting on a PG-13 rating and an August opening. Is that too early for a proper Oscar campaign, or did the film need some room to build an audience, as “The Butler” did? Even with Harvey Weinstein behind a Lee Daniels film starring Forest Whitaker and Oprah Winfrey, that true story fared better at the summer box office ($116 million domestic) than the Oscars; it whiffed on nominations day.

“The Help” writer-director Tate Taylor, in his quest to not churn out the standard biopic, may have gone too far with an unconventional story structure, which predictably, is getting slammed by some top critics. The Los Angeles Times’ Ken Turan says it hurts the film’s narrative engagement. I was not put off by the disjointed narrative–I was riveted by the character and the music–which I grew up with and adore. And while the film makes disjunctive cuts, especially from a pivotal backstage encounter with Brown’s mother (the always-exemplary Viola Davis), when we do return to the scene, the emotional payoff is there. 

There’s no question that Boseman nails a challenging role. Based on the PGA reaction and degree of difficulty in this performance, which the actor admits terrified him, from the dance moves and volatile real-life persona to the singing (they mix him with a remastered Brown), I initially thought that Boseman would easily land awards consideration from critics, SAG, Globes and the Academy acting branch. But in order for that to happen the August release needs to cross over to a wider audience. It opened with strong reviews (70% on Metacritic) to an OK $14 million and a 70% African-American audience that was also 90% over age 25. (Scribe Patrick Goldstein describes being unable to persuade his son to go see the film.) 

But senior Academy voters have previously shown appreciation for acclaimed musical biopics. According to box office analyst Tom Brueggemann, “Get On Up” opened behind “Ray,” which opened in October 2004 to $20 million (which would be higher today) on its way to $75 million, and “42” opened in April 2013 to $27 million and ultimately $95 million. And similar music biopic “Walk the Line,” starring Joaquin Phoenix and Reese Witherspoon as Johnny Cash and June Carter, was released in November 2005 to $22 million, and rode the awards wave for months to reach $119 million. Clearly, “Ray,” “42”and “Walk the Line” boasted more initial appeal to wider audiences. UPDATE: And as commenter Terry J. Erdmann points out, Laurence Fishburne and Angela Bassett earned Best Actor and Best Actress nominations respectively for 1993 Ike & Tina Turner biopic “What’s Love Got to Do with It,” which Disney opened in 58 theaters June 11; the film grossed $5.5 million when it went wide on June 25, and grossed a domestic total of $39 million.
And Boseman’s performance is earning a reaction not dissimilar to those of Oscar-winners Foxx and Witherspoon. But both films nabbed slightly better reviews and a PR and awards season boost from a Toronto Film Festival showcase. Universal chose to go in the less competitive August time frame. 
It doesn’t help that within the African-American community there is a meme–spread on Twitter by well-followed @SpikeLee–that this is the white man’s version of the James Brown story. Folks assume (did they see the film?) that because “Get On Up” is produced, written and directed by white men, they must have soft-pedaled James Brown. In fact, Taylor and Boseman admitted at the PGA that they would have loved to release the R-rated version of the movie. Taylor tangled with the MPAA ratings board, and is unhappy with the edge that he lost. Producer Grazer explained that in order to persuade Universal to release the film, he had to agree contractually to a PG-13 rating. That’s really too bad.

This Article is related to: Awards and tagged , , , , , , ,


Terry J. Erdmann

Please don't forget that Angela Bassett and Laurence Fishburne were nominated for Best Actress in a Leading Role and Best Actor in a Leading Role for What's Love Got To Do With It. Both of them. That's significant.


"Clearly, "Ray," "42"and "Walk the Line" boasted more initial appeal to wider audiences. "

Well, that could be because "Ray" and "Walk" had stars in the leads, and "42" had Harrison Ford. Davis and Spencer are respected talents, but they don't open movies and they are clearly in supporting roles.


Boseman was absolutely AMAZING as James Brown. Without question he deserves to be nominated as this has to be one of the most difficult roles of the year to pull off and I can't imagine anyone else doing a better job of it. He was BRILLIANT and completely believable throughout the entire film. BRAVO !!!!!!!!!!!


I saw the film and thought that Boseman is well on his way to getting nominated, but the story structure left me uninvolved. I also thought that it was odd that one didn't a sense of the the 1960s, Brown's heyday, in the film. If it wasn't for a mentioning of King's assassination and Brown quelling a riot, one wouldn't know that changes were occurring. After all, "Papa Got A Brand Bag" talks of the "new breed" that later embraced black power.

One wouldn't get a sense of how Brown changed and influenced music, how R&B became Soul and then Funk. There's no examination of Brown during the disco years and what happened when he went from King Records to Polydor. There's no sense of the times was how he was affected by it and how the times marked him.

That the film was written by two Brits may well explain how the film had no sense of the structure of feeling that was the 1960s and how then Negroes became black, with James Brown articulating that change. Even more odd: Mick Jagger was the music producer and yet there is no real exploration of how James Brown changed music, influencing three distinct genres: soul, funk, and hip hop.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *