NYFF Review: Paul Thomas Anderson’s ‘Inherent Vice’ Starring Joaquin Phoenix, Josh Brolin, Owen Wilson & More

NYFF Review: Paul Thomas Anderson’s ‘Inherent Vice’ Starring Joaquin Phoenix, Josh Brolin, Owen Wilson & More

It’s been exciting and perhaps confounding to some to watch Paul Thomas Anderson’s career progress over the years. The director’s present day career vs. his homagistic past reveals a night and day difference. What was once hyper-controlled, keyed-up and kinetic is now low-key, hyper-relaxed and enigmatic. The opaque and mysterious “There Will Be Blood” could arguably mark the A.D. period dividing the director’s past and current self. And while a druggy, psychedelic mystery romp adaptation of Thomas Pynchon might seem to be the perfect opportunity for the filmmaker to reconcile his two halves, it doesn’t. And the film is better for it. The Anderson of “Boogie Nights” appears to have vanished, but he hasn’t died as much as matured and evolved. And his boldly singular voice is alive and well in “Inherent Vice,” a hilarious, but melancholy and intuitive stoner noir that leaves much to contemplate.

To paraphrase Maya Rudolph (Anderson’s wife, who cameos), Anderson’s approach is everything and anything, and yet is deeply, distinctly Anderson-ian. This is an apt encapsulation of the auteur’s latest jam-packed, free-flowing, instinctual consideration of Pynchon’s satirical and lugubrious exploration of the counterculture generation. And there will be confusion. Trying to hang with the dense plot of “Inherent Vice” is a fool’s errand, its dialogue-driven reveals trickier to navigate than a hippie camper van with bum steering (a score card of who’s who wouldn’t hurt).

Set at the reefer end of the psychedelic sixties, “Inherent Vice” begins along the warm, sunny coastlines of SoCal beaches, but quickly delves into the morally venal shadows of Nixon-era wealth and privilege encroaching upon the beach bum utopia.
Arriving in San Francisco in the late 1960s, George Harrison once famously said he was put off by beatniks; essentially disavowing the peace and love movement. And so by Pynchon/Anderson’s 1970, there’s a fraudulent toxicity in the air; Manson Family crimes have cast a shadow, the grooviness has turned bummer and all but diminished. What’s left is the darker, disappointing notion that it’s all been a scam quickly co-opted by everyone in sight. Even a celebrated tenor sax player—one of them—has sold himself out to the powers that be. What’s left is the dolor of “who are we?” and “where are we heading?”

Murkier than the bottom of a hashish pipe, here’s the short version of the plot: at the behest of an ex-girlfriend (an unforgettably striking Katherine Waterston), a dazed and confused private investigator, Doc Sportello (Joaquin Phoenix), takes on the case of a disappeared real estate mogul. In the process, the mutton-chopped hippie gumshoe’s ex-old lady goes missing, and he becomes embroiled in a densely layered mystery leading to an even thornier conspiracy with all kinds of sinister tentacles into the greedy capitalistic grid. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg in a thick narrative that involves a black panther, Aryan Nazis, fruity new age types, a mysterious boat, an enigmatic entity known as “The Golden Fang” and a surfer musician/former hippie (Owen Wilson) who’s turned snitch.

Menacing Sportello like a sinister shadow he cannot shake as he investigates the missing persons is Detective “Bigfoot” Bjornsen — a civil-rights violating, power-tripping square of a cop fabulously inhabited by a Flintstone-ian flat-topped Josh Brolin, arguably born to play this squared-jaw character.

PTA defies a lot of conventions in his unorthodox movie, which of course rejects traditional three-act structure for something more shambolic. Instead of the filmmaking maxim “show don’t tell,” the mystery mechanics of the movie fire out rapidly in mumbly dialogue that requires the strictest of attention. Narration is also supposed to be 101 no-no for the refined filmmaker, but PTA leverages this technique too. But the expanded feminine narration, taken from a supporting character in the book, Sortilège (a perfectly at ease Joanna Newsom), a Sportello confidante and gal pal, allows PTA to zero in on the longing and sadness of the novel with a dreamy poeticism.

As noirs are wont do to, McGuffins abound. In fact, the entire impenetrable plot of “Inherent Vice” is one big McGuffin. Like Chandler film adaptations “The Big Sleep,” “The Long Goodbye,” etc. the mystery itself, the big reveal and the plot mechanics are beside the point. Instead, what’s paramount is mood, atmosphere and tenor, which shifts from a warm, sun-dappled haze to a one-toke-over-the-line paranoiac fear and California dreamin’ longing for less corrupt, ugly and cynical times.

While “Inherent Vice” has madcap, surreal, and psychedelic qualities, it would do a great disservice to the nuance of the strange film to label it as any one of those things — its style and camera are not chaotic and there’s a method to moments that resemble refer madness. As Pynchon mixes high and low culture, so does Anderson. The Zuckerberg-ian influence might be a tad overstated, but there’s also some hilariously odd things going on in the corners of the frame. Likewise, Cheech and Chong or “The Big Lebowski” are only surface cousins to this picture because Anderson is just so idiosyncratic and unto himself, these comparisons fall very short.

Aesthetically, ‘Vice’ is beautiful. Robert Elswit’s speckled, sun-kissed photography coupled with David Crank’s lived-in production design (no Jack Fisk for this one) is so genuinely authentic it exhibits a dreamy mood of faded memory and innocence lost (not to fetishize celluloid too much, but the way the camera captures the sprinkle of dust in the air is just magnificent). Anderson’s patient rigor and economic blocking also serve the movie very well (establishing shots take a backseat and like “The Master” there’s a big emphasis on medium and close shots).

And then of course, there’s composer Jonny Greenwood of Radiohead whose superb score is multifaceted and shows the musician’s range, going from jazzy freakbeat to anxious pulsations of an analog electronic unease, to more traditional orchestral work you might hear in an 1940s noir.

While many of the characters can be cartoonish, most of the performances are not; some turns are even grounded and unshowy. Joaquin Phoenix’s forgetful stoner character easily could turn caricature in the wrong hands, but Sportello as drawn by Phoenix is perennially bewildered while still possessing a fine touch.

Part of the delectability of experiencing “Inherent Vice” is seeing where the film will go next. At almost two and a half hours, “Vice’ sprawls through different moods, mysteries and detours, passing many colorful characters by like a wisp (Michael K. Williams as a black power militant is in all of one scene, for example). Loaded with freaks and misfits, Anderson’s film has a ridiculously stacked ensemble of talented players that includes highlights such as Martin Short as a wacked out dentist, Benicio del Toro as a maritime lawyer, and the aforementioned Brolin and luminous Waterston (Reese Witherspoon, Jena Malone, Eric Roberts, Peter McRobbie and Martin Donovan are just a few of the notable co-stars).

A picture that will surely divide, PTA’s latest will not be for all audiences and arguably for hardcore cineastes only, but the movie should be a tad less inscrutable than “The Master.” As per usual, Anderson doesn’t deign to spell anything out other than the plot, which is so complicated it doesn’t matter. And in the picture’s second half it’s all showing and no telling, which may leave some viewers feeling unmoored. “Inherent Vice” will be baffling to some, and these criticisms won’t be invalid. But the point isn’t the plot or the grammar, it’s the feeling, and the layered, complex tempers of Anderson’s latest creation are legion.

“Inherent Vice” should come with a prescription that instructs the viewer to let the movie wash over them like a cloud of smoke blown into ones face. As Anderson’s picture sprawls out, as its mystery unfolds and as Phoenix’s detective awakens to the bogus trip around him, Anderson’s movie takes on a crisp bittersweet temperature, perhaps best exemplified by the autumnal and wistful Neil Young songs that grace the picture (Can, Sam Cooke, Minnie Riperton and more for those keeping score).

And then there’s the loneliness of the private eye who cannot unsee what he’s uncovered; a generation whose escape has been exploited and even enabled by an establishment more than happy to keep them drugged in a billowing fog. Worse, as neither cop nor crook, the protagonist detective lives in the isolated netherworld removed from blissful civilian ignorance and estranged from the corruption of so-called law enforcement.

A faithful adaptation of Pynchon’s slightly more digestible novel (at least compared to author’s denser works), ultimately, “Inherent Vice” is about the long con job literally and figuratively; the twisty conspiracy that Doc Sportello unravels and the lies his peace and love generation has been sold. Big, wonderfully oddball, sometimes confounding and beautiful, “Inherent Vice” supplies good dosages of stoner giggles. But its doobage is potent and reflects some heavy ideas you’ll need to unpack and meditate on for a long while. [B+]

This Article is related to: Reviews and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Comments

Treesponge

Spot-on review, very well written. One thing needs fixing though: "As Anderson’s picture sprawls out, as its mystery unfolds and as Phoenix’s detective awakens to the bogus trip around him, Anderson’s movie takes…" repeats Anderson’s movie.

loudrockmusic

Saw it tonight. Liked it. Not loved it.

Not Kevin Jagernauth

Sorry all. Since we sold out to Indiewire we just don’t care about the reviews. Remember when we uses to write unbiased articles and reviews? Remember we used to put funny titles to our weekly list? Remember? That’s all been sacrificed for a cheque.

Marky Mark

When’s the movie releasing on torrents?

Nvisigoth

I probably would have been more excited about this if the original casting – with Robert Downey Jr. as Doc, had been retained. Not as interested in seeing Phoenix play yet another stoner (his speciality, really)… Downey would have made it SO much more interesting. Now it just sounds like a strange, long yawn. Pass.

Marky Mark

I post fake spoilers because my horrible mother raised me to be a tool.

Jonny

Yeah it was awesome but I agree with Dirk Diggler…I can’t understand why Jauquin Pheonix had to get shot and die in the end it was so unexpected!

josh

@cirkusfolk

yeah, that particular scene was weak, i agree. subtle may have been the way to go there. i’ve enjoyed all of PTA’s releases besides Punch Drunk Love and am a diehard Pynchon fan, so this is a must see for me regardless. if it doesn’t meet my expectations, no big loss. the book is still there up on my shelf to read.

cirkusfolk

@Josh…that’s the thing, this is supposed to be a favorable review and it doesn’t make me want to see it. Like another poster said, I don’t want to just watch a film to pick up and vibe or feeling. I want to enjoy a good film. And I agree with you in that Pheonix doesn’t seem to be on target in the trailers. The scene where he asks for a picture and then yells out left me cold. What was supposed to be funny about that?

josh

@cirkusfolk

don’t let anyone’s review of a film put you off toward it. reviews are simply another man/woman’s reaction to it. you may find it far more rewarding or funny than Señor Perez.

cirkusfolk

Thanks to this review, the film has now dropped out of my ‘top five to see’ list. I’m not too keen on this new PTA. So now my most anticipated films are: Interstellar, American Sniper, Foxcatcher, Nightcrawler and Birdman.

josh

first choice was robert downey jr. would have loved to see him play a stoner dick with an afro.

btw those complaining about the hard to follow plot, have any of you read the book? seems like it sticks pretty closely to it, which, to say the least, or most, is pynchonesque.

Josh

A friend of mine got into a screening. He said the main problem is Joaquin Phoenix just isn’t funny. He has no comic timing and that sinks the whole movie. Doc should have been played by Harrelson or McConaughey, two notorious Hollywood stoners but also guys with killer comic chops.

amber waves

What the hell man spoiling the movie ! FKING A-HOLE @Dirkdiggler

daz

Is he really f*cking around? I hope he is.

lvs

F*ck you and your spoilers. Idiot.

Leigh

Talk about bending over backward to like a movie. The plot’s not the point? It’s next to impossible to follow? Screw Anderson. Shouldn’t he have to make a good movie just like most other filmmakers for it to be a good movie? Critical darlings be damned.

To the stupid Dirk

@Dirk Diggler: what an imbecile. And to Playlist. Couldn’t you moderate the comments for stupid shit like this? Will never visit here again.

False

@KINDRED SPIRIT He’s just a shitty commenter that’s f*cking around. Do not worry.

kindred spirit

@DirkDiggler- what in the fk? I don’t know if you’re kidding but if not, way to spoil the movie. You’re a jerk.

Nice try

Amusing. :) None of this happens obviously.

Dirk Diggler

Brilliant film. Though didnt expect them to kill of Phoenix at the end of the movie. The whole bad guy wins again scenario is overplayed.Berlin as the two faced square jaw was brilliant again. That scene where he shoot Phoenix in his head and Phoenix still talks, wow.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *