You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Who’s Laughing Now? The History of the Sitcom Laugh Track

Who’s Laughing Now? The History of the Sitcom Laugh Track

In previews for the new comedy "Mulaney," the show’s
stars, producers, and writers claim the series is a return to tradition for the
sitcom format. All the pieces are in play. Based on the life of a comedian?
Check. Wacky neighbors? Check. Filmed before a live studio audience? Check. And
the laugh track? Check.

Since the laugh track’s creation in the 1940s, televised comedy
has been "sweetened" with laughs, whether they are deserved or not.
Decade after decade, the chuckles kept coming from one source or another, and
those who attempt to stand in their way tend to get heckled off the stage.
Today, shows like "The Big Bang Theory," "Two and a Half Men"
and a slew of other Chuck Lorre originals trounce on the supposedly
sophisticated, and proudly laugh track-free, self-reflexive sitcoms of the
modern age. But ratings don’t
lie: the laugh track is as big as ever
.

READ MORE: Why Sitcoms like ‘Friends With Better Lives’ Never Stand a Chance

Dating back to the 1940s, the laugh track aimed to solve a common
problem: Creating a theater experience at home. Back then, hooking an audience
with a radio program wasn’t easy. Almost
all performance art was a communal experience up until this point, and radio
and TV made it a personal one. Recordings of live comedy simulated the feeling
of being in the theater, because of the audience response, but not every
audience could be depended on for quality giggles. To compensate, audio engineers stitched together the
laughs from a good night with an off one and inadvertently created one of the
most significant technical jumps in television history. Things would continue
in this way until one man and his mysterious box changed TV forever.

Invented by Charley Douglass, a sound engineer who helped
develop radar systems for the Navy during World War II
, the
"laff box" made its television debut on "The Hank McCune
Show" in 1956. Douglass, unsatisfied with the "sweetening" process, built a two-and-a-half foot high device that
looked like a mix of an organ and a typewriter.
Its keys, when
connected to the laugh recordings, creating a range of response for any joke,
big or small. One key produced a woman’s laugh, another a child’s; a mix would create big laughs, a single would
create minor one. Douglass even went so far as to update his device ever few
years or so, mixing and matching different laughs, retiring old and introducing
new, to keep up with audiences. This not only gave that communal experience to
people at home, but also helped shape the structure and pacing of modern sitcoms.
It was a revelatory moment for TV, one that most artists despised. 

Douglass’s device was almost immediately controversial. Producers
requested Douglass to litter programs with laughs, but Douglass didn’t
want the laughs to overpower the work. Artists sided with Douglass. However,
when some artists struck back and asked networks to reign back their use of the
laff box, their shows quickly descended into cancelation, as was the case with "The Monkees" and
the first sitcom by up-and-coming comedic icon Bill Cosby, "The
Bill Cosby Show." This soon started a war over who controlled the box. Douglas only gave
family members the key to the padlocked garage that housed the laff box, and
networks began disputing over which family member would control it. Charley,
the most conservative of the Douglasses, was rarely
their first choice.

Soon, a majority of TV comedies rested on this crutch. Not even
the rise of "this show was filmed before a live studio audience" could
quell the canned laughs. Critically revered and commercially successful shows,
like "The Mary Tyler Moore Show," "Taxi," "The
Bob Newhart Show," "Cheers," and,
of course, "Seinfeld" "sweetened" live
laughs with canned ones. It wasn’t
until the new millennium that TV began to shift.

Throughout the late 90s and 2000s, the laugh track became a
symbol of the unsophisticated TV show, one defiantly outside the "Golden
Age of TV." It’s hard to
disagree. A shortlist of the best comedies of the era — "The
Office," "Arrested Development," "Curb
Your Enthusiasm" — all managed to have huge cultural
cache without forcing laughs on the viewer. 

There was a distinct change in the
way TV viewers watch and how showrunners made their shows: Shows like "Arrested
Development" had the ability to rely not just on scripted jokes but also
editing to deliver punch-lines minutes, episodes, and even seasons later. The
age of the DVD meant that whereas before you could only watch an episode once
when it broadcasted and then maybe catch it years later in syndication, you
could now watch episodes over and over, picking out details and finding new
jokes through repeat viewings.
Meta-comedies like "30 Rock," "It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia" and
"Community" ditched the laugh track so they could
overstuff every frame with jokes about TV. The sheer volume of jokes in a
single "30 Rock" makes the show feel more like the
movie "Airplane" than an episode of "Mary Tyler Moore."

Elements of truth and realism were now expected of sitcoms, and
stock characters, like the wacky boss archetype, were developed into rounded
characters. David Brent (or his American equivalent, Michael Scott) made what
would’ve been a second tier character on
lesser shows into the focus. They turned the "Fonzie" into
the "Richie," so
to speak
— something Ricky Gervais even parodied on "Extras." Because as it always has done, television had evolved with technology. Viewers grew savvier, more literate and able to determine what was funny and what wasn’t.

Or so we think.

Today, the laugh track lives in a strange space, as does the
sitcom. Shows that would’ve been the
perfect model of a sitcom now look and feel like a revisionary one, i.e. "Modern
Family." "How
I Met My Mother" spent nine seasons having their cake
and eating it, too, constructing a structurally complex series with light laugh
sweetening throughout — even though the track is noticeably quieter than other
shows.

The laugh track itself has its own strange place in our culture.
Popular YouTube videos like "Big
Bang Theory
" without a laugh track heightened the
awkwardness of sitcom patter and subverted the laugh track’s
intention; appropriately, The Onion’s
Clickhole had their own take: "Big Bang Theory" with
laughs added
.

The truth is that even in the "Golden Age" of
television, comedies without laugh tracks fare worse than those with them. A 2013 comparison of "Parks
and Recreation" and "Big
Bang Theory" shows that more people want
pre-determined laughs, to the tune of 14 million people
. Just a few
years earlier, a different study sustained a different argument producers have
made since the 40s: "We’re much more likely to laugh at something funny in the
presence of other people.
" Turns out, that communal experience
the laugh track creates still matters.

"Mulaney" doesn’t need to bring
back the classic sitcom, because it never left. Shows like "Louie"
might be deconstructing the formula "Mulaney" invokes, but CK’s
viewership pales in comparison to his FX compatriot Charlie Sheen. Things haven’t
changed too much for the populous — viewers still seem to prefer a communal
experience to a personal one. The laugh track continues to keep audiences
comfortable in between punchlines, just as it always has.

READ MORE: 25 Years After ‘Seinfeld,’ Where Are All the Elaines?

This Article is related to: Television and tagged , , ,


Comments

Jamie Dilts

I had a thought regarding the long-term effect of "pre-determined laughs" on the development of a viewer’s actual sense of humor. What I mean is that if we watch a show with a neutral mindset regarding certain humor themes, will the use of canned laughter teach us to consider these themes more entertaining than we originally had. Perhaps it would be a form of artificial peer-pressure from the "communal experience" created by the laughter.

Distracting Duck

Watching Cheers, hearing that one guy in the audience with the unique and loud laugh in every episode. I think they refreshed the stock of laughter after about 5 seasons. Or maybe they just stopped letting that guy come to the set.

B.A. Secrist

well I’ve actually become immune to it so I guess you could say I ignore it. But when I pay attention to it,it’s so so irritating.

Kristina

I have grown used to shows without a laugh track, hence, I am now more aware of it when a show has it, and it just annoys me to no end. I wish they would get away with it whatsoever. They added a laugh track to community the last season, and in my opinion, it ruined it.

José

I think another way to think about this is that the laugh track is still alive for the people that watch T.V. It says very little about the preferences of the viewers of alternative media, i.e. Metflix.

Dirk Gates

Nice article, Matt. Can’t tell you how many times I’ve had to argue with someone in the YouTube comments that shows like Seinfeld are heavily supplemented with a laugh track. They swear it’s all an audience. I love that I can watch Seinfeld in widescreen HD now, but I sure wish I could disable the laugh track. They seem to use it at the end of EVERY line of dialogue.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *