Leonardo DiCaprio And Christian Bale Reportedly Asked By Steve Jobs’ Widow Not To Star In ‘Steve Jobs’

Leonardo DiCaprio And Christian Bale Reportedly Asked By Steve Jobs' Widow Not To Star In 'Steve Jobs'

For all the critical acclaim "Steve Jobs" has received, things have gotten pretty heated off-screen. Apple CEO Tim Cook lashed out at the movie and defended his former his boss, saying on "The Late Show With Stephen Colbert" that, "He was a joy to work with and I love him dearly, I miss him every day. I think that a lot of people are trying to be opportunistic and I hate that, it’s not a great part of our world.” Screenwriter Aaron Sorkin did not take that comment lightly, responding, "If you’ve got a factory full of children in China assembling phones for 17 cents an hour, you’ve got a lot of nerve calling someone else opportunistic." Zing. (Sorkin later apologized). But the nervousness of Cook in general is perhaps not surprising given that the film shows the Apple icon as a genius who had as much intelligence as flaws (basically, he was kind of a jerk). And apparently, Jobs’ wife was also none too pleased to learn that a movie was being made about her late husband.

The Hollywood Reporter reveals that Laurene Jobs — who notably did not take participate in Walter Isaacson‘s book on which the movie is based — apparently reached out to Leonardo DiCaprio and Christian Bale, two early rumored leads for the movie, and urged them not to sign on.

READ MORE: Review: Danny Boyle’s ‘Steve Jobs’ Is A Rush Of Blood To The Head

"Since the very beginning, Laurene Jobs has been trying to kill this movie, OK?" a source told the trade. "Laurene Jobs called Leo DiCaprio and said, ‘Don’t do it.’ Laurene Jobs called Christian Bale and said, ‘Don’t [do it].’ "
Meanwhile, another Sony executive stated, "She reached out; she had a strong desire not to have the movie made. But we said, ‘We’re going to move forward.’ My understanding is, she did call one or two of the actors." As for director Danny Boyle, he also acknowledges resistance from Tim Cook and Laurence Jobs, but won’t go into details. "They haven’t helped," he said. "There’s been some tough moments. I’m not going to go into them."

It the end, the picture did end up getting made, even if the journey was tough. David Fincher, initially attached to direct, fell out of favor by demanding $10 million just to get behind the camera, a $45 million budget, and full control over the marketing (by comparison, he was paid $5 million for "The Social Network," and didn’t have final say on that movie’s promotion). And then there was the friction between Sony head Amy Pascal and producer Scott Rudin, which got quite ugly, and the project eventually shifted over to Universal.

However, underneath the concerns of Cook and Jobs’ widow is undoubtedly how Steve Jobs’ legacy will be preserved, and how the movie represents the "truth." But particularly as we head into the awards season, where this "issue" tends to flare up, the words from A.O. Scott‘s New York Times review of "Steve Jobs" are particularly instructive: "The accuracy of this portrait is not my concern. Cinematic biographies of the famous are not documentaries. They are allegories: narrative vessels into which meanings and morals are packed like raisins in an oatmeal cookie; modern, secular equivalents of medieval lives of the saints; cautionary tales and beacons of aspiration."

"Steve Jobs" opens on Friday and goes wide on October 23rd. 

This Article is related to: News and tagged , , , ,


Comments

ninaalexeivaughn@yahoo.com

British directors seem very keen in displaying their kings and prime ministers in a very good light…The Kings Speech and being very accurate but when it comes to American History or persons they are just happy to point out all the bad and not really portray things accurately…after all, it is only an American president, icon, or genius. Why would they care about taking creative lisence on the USA? Let’s not forget how nicely Hawkings was portrayed when he caused his wife so much suffering with adultery,etc.

Jared

I’d find it pretty funny if DiCaprio lost out on the Oscar again to Michael Fassbender. DiCaprio’s great, but I find the Leonardo DiCaprio Gets Snubbed By Oscar meme to be pretty funny

Chantal beleck

No comments everything is fine do not worry about anything love u so much

David Topper

@lulu i doubt it reduces him to smart jerk. Just look at Social Network, how people were talking about hiw the film shows Zuckerberg. I havent seen this yet but it seems theyvare very similar and sorkin is a great writer and I doubt the film just shows him as smart and a jerk, no less being played by fassbender

lulu

That’s tricky territory, not sure I stand in the film makers camp. I mean the summation is basically the guy was a very smart jerk? Job’s widow has every right to be pissed at the complex man she loved being reduced for the sake of entertainment, and prestige. Sorkin himself comes off as a bit of a jerk when he justifies one moral failing with another, maybe he should write an autobiographical piece about his own bull***t. I do agree with A.O Scott, but if we’re just hanging an allegory on someone, it doesn’t really matter which historical figure a film maker uses, so maybe it would feel less tacky if the body wasn’t still warm.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *