Back to IndieWire

A Less Hostile View of ‘Alice Through the Looking Glass’

A Less Hostile View of ‘Alice Through the Looking Glass’

Having just seen Disney’s Alice Through the Looking Glass on opening night, with a paying
audience at the El Capitan Theater in Hollywood, I am late in filing my review.
I had a mixed reaction to the film, but I am somewhat surprised by the
hostility expressed by my fellow critics. I took it as a given that this sequel
to the 2010 Disney mega-hit would have little to do with Lewis Carroll. I also
knew that screenwriter Linda Woolverton would call on the same female-empowerment
theme that marked the previous Alice, directed
by Tim Burton. And I knew that this modern interpretation of Alice would be
perfectly personified by Mia Wasikowska, who seems incapable of striking a
false note on screen.

          There are
many pleasures to be had in this eye-filling extravaganza, from an opening
storm at sea (with Alice as the captain of a sailing ship) to the steampunk-like
world commanded by Time, played with comic relish by Sacha Baron Cohen.

          To my relief,
Johnny Depp’s Mad Hatter is a mellower figure this time around; he is also
melancholy to the point of depression, which impels Alice to travel back in
time in order to save his now-departed family. (This involves the peril of
tinkering with events of the past, which as any Twilight Zone fan knows, is highly dangerous.) Even Helena Bonham
Carter, who was so furiously funny in the 2010 movie, doesn’t have to work as
hard to convey her outsized emotions here.

performances compete with the beauty and extravagance of Dan Hennah’s production
design. Having worked on The Lord of the
trilogy and The Hobbit
movies, he is well versed in fantasy on a grand scale. So is director James
Bobin, having worked with Flight of the
and having directed the two recent Muppet movies.

          But, I will admit,
I grew tired at a certain point. Like many of these elaborate “tentpole”
blockbusters, Alice can be
exhausting. I didn’t mind the fact that so many characters’ backstories are
spelled out in literal fashion, but having accepted and even embraced the time-travel
premise, I was ready for the filmmakers to wrap things up long before they did.

          Having heard
dreadful things about the movie going in, I was pleasantly surprised that I
liked it as much as I did. And I remain a card-carrying member of Mia Wasikowska’s
fan club. Lewis Carroll purists should stay away, but judging by last night’s
Disney-centric audience, I think moviegoers will find much to enjoy.

This Article is related to: Reviews and tagged , , , , , , , , , ,



"And I remain a card-carrying member of Mia Wasikowska’s fan club." Same here. She’s the only reason I have any investment in this sequel.


Mr. Matlin is so on-the-money with Mia Wasikowska, "incapable of striking a false note on screen". The movie did have its pleasures – humor and some genuinely touching scenes – but I also felt it went on too long. The degree of the hostility directed at it is rather extreme, but so is a lot of the anger and negativity that we see around us these days. These are "interesting" times we live in.

Jody Morgan

As a Lewis Carroll purist, I skipped the first movie and will skip this one as well, but I won’t begrudge anyone who wants to see them; from what I’ve seen, they’re visually spectacular and benefit from a handful of excellent performances.


How much are Wasikowka’s people paying this critic?


I completely agree, yes this movie had a couple of flaws but it’s not as bad as other critics are making it out to be. The visuals were beyond stunning, the story was fun and also emotional, and Mia was sensational as Alice. It’s a shame not many people see what an enjoyable gem this film is. But at least Leonard Maltin sees the good in it!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *