Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
Celebrating 17 Years of Film.Biz.Fans.
by Danny Bowes
July 10, 2013 11:19 AM
7 Comments
  • |

10 Things You Should Know About Indian Cinema

Salman Khan in "Wanted."
Songs!

In 2009's "Wanted," hero Salman Khan saunters into a warehouse full of bad guys and proceeds to very thoroughly beat the crap out of every last one of them, single-handedly. He then saunters back out of the warehouse and lip-syncs a song about what a badass he is, with dozens of backup dancers, bright colors, and a drop-in by fellow movie star Anil Kapoor (who doesn't appear at all in the rest of the movie, he's just coming by to say hi). At the end of the song, Salman Khan is successfully established as The Star.

Songs in Indian cinema don't necessarily have anything to do with the story, though they can, but they're usually just there because…well, who doesn't like music and want to see stars dancing? A special subset of this is the item number, a showcase for a particularly attractive female performer who may -- but more often may not -- appear in the rest of the movie. These are mainly for marketing coups for certain music labels, but when done well can be works of art in themselves.


Singers!

Contrary to the trend in Western musicals, where great care is taken to have the actors themselves sing -- regardless of whether they actually can -- Indian films have not only never made any effort to hide the fact that nearly all of their songs are lip-synced (with rare exceptions made for stars who actually can sing, or are famous enough that their desire to is indulged).

The artists, called playback singers, who provide the stars' singing voices -- like Asha Bhosle, Lata Mangeshkar, Kishore Kumar, or Sukwinder Singh (to name but a tiny fraction) -- are as legendary as the faces on the screen. There is no question of "settling" for a career as a playback singer, but it can be every bit as prestigious as acting.


What Makes A Bollywood Star A Star?

Indian movie star Dilip Kumar.

One of the ways in which the Indian film industries, and in particular Bollywood, resemble classic Hollywood is in their systemic manufacture and cultivation of movie stars. Like Hollywood, the history of Bollywood is rife with failed star launches.

On the other hand, when it works, it really works. This is partly because of the heightened nature of so many Indian movies, but also in part due to the institutional support they receive in maintaining their glamor and larger-than-life image. Indian movie stars really feel like movie stars. Dilip Kumar, Dev Anand, Shammi Kapoor, Dharmendra, Rajesh Khanna, Dev Anand, Amitabh Bachchan, Rishi Kapoor, The Three Khans (Aamir, Salman, Shahrukh). Madhubala, Waheeda Rehman, Asha Parekh, Shamila Tagore, Parveen Babi, Zeenat Aman, Hema Malini, Rekha, Sridevi, Kajol, Madhuri Dixit, Aishwarya Rai, Rani Mukerji, Kareena Kapoor.

Stars, even more so than in the West, essentially play themselves; heroes will be introduced in dramatic low-angle shots to make them look thirty feet tall, heroines lit glowingly as divine visions. Some films lay it on thicker than others, but there's never any question about who the stars are.


The Release Schedule Has, Let's Say, Some Quirks

Some aspects of the release calendar may look familiar to American audiences: Big holiday blockbusters come out on Eid (the holiday commemorating the end of Ramadan), sort of like the way they do during U.S. holidays. Less familiar is the way Bollywood in particular basically shuts down during cricket season. While the Indian Premier League is on, very few releases of any consequence hit theaters, a dry period comparable to January in the American film industry.

The Hindi industry's version of the Oscars, the Filmfare Awards, skew slightly more populist (which would delight all the authors of "the Oscars are out of touch with popular taste" thinkpieces that raise everyone's blood pressure each year). More importantly, the Filmfares give out an award for "Best Action," which is just wonderful.

Parallel Cinema: Indies and Arthouse Cachet

Ironically, a lot of Western film lovers have an easier time with Indian arthouse and indie fare, both of which are known as "parallel cinema" in India. (That's an ironic title given the parallel evolution of the American and Indian film industries.) These titles favor naturalistic/realistic approaches. Some filmmakers known as parallel cinema filmmakers will employ elements of pop cinema, like songs and movie stars. One such example is Mani Ratnam's 1998 film "Dil Se," which starred Shahrukh Khan, and blended serious political commentary with a lyrical romantic tragedy.

Satyajit Ray.

The most famous name in this movement is the great Bengali auteur Satyajit Ray, one of the most celebrated filmmakers in the world, let alone south Asia. The height of Ray's career coincides, by no accident, with the Golden Age of Indian cinema, stretching roughly from independence until the 1960s. Indian art cinema today often recalls American "Indiewood" films of the late 1990s and early-to-mid-2000s: a hybrid of arthouse and pop, backed by the industry itself but maintaining distance from mass-market blockbusters. Like their American counterparts, some are better than others, with the best quite good and the worst not very.


It All Comes Down to Family

In too many mainstream Hindi films to count, the big tough hero who can throw cars with his mustache and is master of all that he surveys comes home to find his mother yelling at him about his lack of responsibility, his need to get married and other pedestrian concerns. It's not just something that's played for laughs, either.

Generally (in mainstream films at least), in a choice between an individual and either a literal family or a group standing in for one, the moral point of view expressed is that the family/group should come first and nearly always does. For Americans, maybe the most individualistic people in history, this is occasionally a tough pill to swallow -- but more than any of the other items on this list, it's essential that one understands the source of this ingredient before approaching these films.

---

For American audiences, Indian films offer a cultural challenge unlike others posed by different foreign cinemas. Because of the relative isolation of the Indian film industries with regard to the West, since it took almost a century before any broad tendency to emulate other film cultures arose, India occupies a unique place in film culture,  one every cinephile should explore. With the right mindset, immersion in these waters can be a wonderful experience indeed.


Special thanks to Filmi Girl and Beth Watkins for their expertise and their help in getting names and facts right in this piece.


7 Comments

  • Jennifer Stevenson | October 15, 2013 9:46 AMReply

    I would love to have read this article in its entirety. No, I don't know the author personally. But I can tell when good stuff has been deleted. Please, show us the whole article! This is great, but I want more.

  • Mansi | September 22, 2013 6:52 AMReply

    I like how you've pointed various themes that are inherently Bollywood, from the song and dance routine, to the family culture. Today, however, we're going beyond the regular mainstream masala, which the westerners still overlook. Films like Wake Up Sid, Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara, Dil Chahta Hai reflect an equally "Indian" (urban) culture that resonates with a large part of the audience here. The last decade has witnessed that turnaround. There are countless others, that do not adhere to that routine format. Guess it will take some time before we're recognized for those. ( Lunchbox, English Vinglish, Paan Singh Tomar, Ship of Theseus etc.) :-)

  • Rajesh kumar Pathe | August 7, 2013 12:04 PMReply

    The tag on pic says ""Raja Rajinikanth," the first Indian feature film." Couldn't stop laughing... It is Raja Harishchandra not Raja Rajinikanth....

    Actually Rajinikanth is such a star power today from Southen India that his presence can be seen very well everywhere... So I guess his name appears in first ever movie in Indian Cinema is likely to be accepted by blind people and media .. gosh!!

  • Qasim Virjee | July 10, 2013 5:00 PMReply

    Nice overview of Indian cinema Danny! Whilst Bollywood is larger than ever, it still doesn't produce the majority of feature length content from the region; established Telegu, Tamil, Marathi, Gujurati, Bengali and other cinema cultures are also growing and have been producing a wealth of titles for nearly as long.

    This is something we're working hard on representing at GetFilmi (http://getfilmi.com) - a member subscription service I run which curates a selection of titles and gives members unlimited access to our growing catalog.

    One note on 'Parallel cinema' - the modern independent movement in India is producing some excellent short and feature length films (we have some exciting ones from people like Bengali producer 'Q' coming online soon) and its a phenomenon which will only get more popular - both for people seeking affordable means of producing films as well as audiences; as they become used to digital aesthetics etc...

  • Madhav | July 10, 2013 2:39 PMReply

    This is so gross. There is not even a single mention about malayalam film industry any were. it's contribution to Indian Cinema is not any less. Its unreasonable when a site like indiewire makes a huge mistake like this. This so unprofessional and unethical

  • Grammar Nazi | July 10, 2013 11:24 PM

    Why you being such a pimp, do you even know whats unethical? Doosh!

  • Nikky | July 10, 2013 2:12 PMReply

    Great article. Honestly, when I saw this pic from Ye Jawani Hai Diwani in my newsfeed, I thought this is going to be another condescendingly written piece talking about the usual dance & music routine. I was pleasantly surprised that the writer mentioned that there is more to Indian films than just Hindi films.