Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
Celebrating 17 Years of Film.Biz.Fans.
by Indiewire
June 3, 2014 12:52 PM
39 Comments
  • |

9 Actors Who Succeeded at Making Leap From Indies to Blockbusters and 3 Who Failed

Yesterday, after months of rumors, it was finally revealed that Lupita Nyong'o will indeed be joining the "Star Wars" cast for J.J. Abrams' upcoming entry in the space saga. For the actress it marks an anticipated follow-up to her Oscar-winning supporting performance in "12 Years a Slave" (she barely registered in this spring's "Non-Stop," so let's just pretend it never happened), a film made for just around $20 million that went on to win Best Picture at the Oscars and emerge as one of the most acclaimed films of 2013. Add another 0 to that number, and you probably have the budget for the new "Star Wars" film. It's a huge leap for the actress who was a complete unknown this time last year. Given her proven talent and the project's pedigree, we're certain she'll transition beautifully. In honor of her casting, we've highlighted nine other actors who fared well at leaping from indies to blockbusters, and three who didn't follow in their steps. [The list is in no particular order.]

The Nine Who Succeeded:

Scarlett Johansson

Having gotten started in independent films, Esquire's 2006 Sexiest Woman Alive has emerged as an A-list blockbuster star. She catapulted to stardom opposite Bill Murray in Sofia Coppola's Oscar-winning indie "Lost in Translation," which let her capture key roles in smaller studio fare like Chistopher Nolan's "The Prestige" and Brian De Palma's "The Black Dahlia." Her blockbuster breakout came as the Black Widow in "Iron Man 2," a character she got to embody again in "The Avengers" and the latest "Captain America" film. While Johansson has remained loyal to her indie roots starring in recent indies like "Under the Skin," "Don Jon" and "Her," Black Widow is the type of role that will keep her steadily on the big screen for years to come.

Christian Bale

Today, given his Oscar and comic book fanbase, it can be easy to forget about Christian Bale's hugely celebrated indie roots. His biggest roles before Christopher Nolan and Bruce Wayne came knocking were as a deranged serial killer/music aficionado/ businessman Patrick Bateman in "American Psycho" and as Trevor Reznik in "The Machinist," a role for which he maintained a weight of 120 pounds. Of course, he gained all of that weight back and more to fit as the muscular vigilante known as Batman for "Batman Begins" in 2005. That film launched Bale's superstardom and one of the most celebrated movie franchises ever.

Jennifer Lawrence

When Jennifer Lawrence first appeared in 2010's "Winter's Bone" everyone wondered where this young star came from. Now, it's hard to imagine Lawrence anywhere else but in the spotlight. She's been nominated for three Oscars (winning one), has a long list of films coming out and perhaps most impressively stars in two highly successful blockbuster series. When considering actors who have transitioned from indie to mainstream, Lawrence epitomizes a success story, snagging leading roles in both the "Hunger Games" films and the "X-Men" reboot. 

Michael Fassbender

Fassbender burst on to the world stage with Steve McQueen's historical drama "Hunger" back in 2008. The term "transition," however, may not be the most accurate way to describe the trajectory of his career. Even as he works on the "X-Men" franchise, Fassbender has continued to work on independent projects helmed by auteurs like Steve McQueen ("Shame," "12 Years a Slave"), David Cronenberg ("A Dangerous Method") and Steven Soderbergh ("Haywire"). Although Fassbender takes on a different character each time -- a sex addict in "Shame," a slave owner in "12 Years a Slave," a psychoanalyst in "A Dangerous Method," and an assassin in "Haywire," -- they share in their fundamentally distorted point-of-view about the world; a characteristic that has probably helped Fassbender not only secure the role of Magneto, but also execute it with great finesse, as it drew significantly from the onscreen persona he cultivated up to that point.

Kirsten Dunst

Most of us have been watching Kirsten Dunst's career unfold ever since she first wowed in "Interview with the Vampire." But it was her role in Sofia Coppola's 1999 drama "The Virgin Suicides," based on the novel by Jeffrey Eugenides, that really launched her indie career. Dunst, however, didn't stop there. Three years after "Virgin Suicides," she snagged a role in Sam Raimi's "Spider-Man" trilogy. The film series was not only commercially successful, but Dunst also achieved some of the same raves she had won in her earlier roles. Her transition from indies to blockbusters goes to show that quality and quantity can sometimes go hand in hand. 

James McAvoy

Similar to Fassbender, McAvoy strikes a balance between indie and blockbuster projects -- case and point being the simultaneous release of "Filth" and "X-Men: Days of Future Past." The world first took notice of McAvoy back in 2006 when he co-starred with Forest Whitaker in "The Last King of Scotland." A year later, McAvoy was again lauded by critics for his performance in Joe Wright's cinematic adaptation of Ian McEwan's novel "Atonement." By casting McAvoy as Professor X in the "X-Men" re-boot, Marvel was able to capitalize on the actor's onscreen reputation as a righteous, yet oft-wronged person.

Mark Ruffalo

Before he was the Hulk in "The Avengers," Mark Ruffalo had a pretty long career as an indie actor. He broke out in a big way with his acclaimed performance in 2000's "You Can Count On Me," and continued endearing himself to critics with strong turns in Jane Campion's "In the Cut" (in which he bared all), and in Lisa Cholodenko's "The Kids Are Alright," which earned him his first Oscar nomination. What's most impressive is that even as an actor older than many on this list, he proves that it's never too late to star in a blockbuster.

Kristen Stewart in "Breaking Dawn Part 2"

Kristen Stewart

Regardless of what you think of Kristen Stewart's performance as Bella Swan in the hit "Twilight" film series, there's no denying that the actress is now in-demand more than ever. Prior to becoming tabloid fodder for twihards worldwide, Stewart cut her teeth in indies, appearing memorably in "Into the Wild," "In the Land of Women" and "The Yellow Handkerchief." In between making the five "Twilight" entries, Stewart remained active on the indie front, turning in strong performances in a number of films including "Adventureland," "Welcome to the Rileys," "On the Road" and "The Runaways." Now with "Twilight" over, she's basking in the best reviews of her career for her performance opposite Juliette Binoche in Olivier Assayas' "Clouds of Sils Maria," which just recently world premiered at the 2014 Cannes Film Festival.

Laura Dern

Prior to screaming her way to icon status for Steven Spielberg in the first (and best) "Jurassic Park" movie, Laura Dern was known as the oddball actress (and daughter to future Oscar-nominee Bruce Dern) beloved by David Lynch who had worked with her in "Wild at Heart" and "Blue Velvet." She proved herself to be one of the most versatile actors of her generation in those two films, so it didn't come as a huge surprise that she seemed totally at home in Spielberg's mammoth blockbuster. That she managed to even register amid all the dinosaurs is quite the accomplishment.

The Three Who Failed:

Hayden Christensen

Crawling his way from the bottom to the top only to fall back down again, Hayden Christensen has had a topsy-turvy career. Finding his feet on Canadian television at the age of 13, he properly came into the public eye in Irvin Winker's 2001 indie drama "Life as a House," portraying Sam, the son of terminally ill man anxious to reconnect his family. He then, with bravado, breached the boundaries of stardom, being cast as Anakin Skywalker (AKA Darth Vader) in "Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones" and "Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith." His performance though failed to inspire and collected two Golden Raspberry Awards on its way to being quickly forced out of memory. Things then continued from bad to worse for Christensen, his figure fading out of the limelight at an alarmingly quick rate. A cacophony of bad choices and bad films, including the obscure "Quantum Quest: A Cassini Space Odyssey", the widely panned "Taker" and the straight-to-DVD stunner "Virgin Territory," revoked his A-list status and has left him largely unemployed. It's not all bad though. You have to remember, he's been in a total of four films with Samuel Jackson. That's got to mean something, right?

Emile Hirsch

Emile Hirsh had all the potential, charisma and smiles to make it happen. A prodigy of sorts, he burst onto the cinematic scene at an early age with stars in his eyes, gaining multiple plaudits for work in the independent coming-of-age comedy-drama "The Dangerous Lives of Altar Boys." Everything was going smoothly. He was going to conquer the world, surely. He snagged the perfect transition role, leading the Sean Penn-directed "Into the Wild" with swagger as fun-loving Christopher "Alexander Supertramp" McCandless. 2008 then rolled around and things got a bit complicated. Tripling his usual workload (from one film a year to three), Hirsch was finally getting the attention he deserved. The work though was a definite mixed bag. He had supporting roles in "Milk" (great film) and "The Air I Breathe" (not so great). The biggest step forward for Hirsh, however, was in leading the newly developed "Speed Racer" franchise, which flopped hard. As Hirsh explained himself in our interview, "'Speed Racer' was a huge financial disaster to a certain degree, so after that movie I wasn't going to be offered leads in huge movie star parts for a little bit after that." Recently he starred in David Gordon Green's "Prince Avalanche" alongside Paul Rudd, and A&E's "Bonnie & Clyde" mini-series.

Jake Gyllenhaal

Jake Gyllenhaal comes from a show biz family. His father is a director. His mother is a screenwriter. His sister, Maggie, also acts. In any sense, he's always seemed destined for great things. He confirmed his status as a leading man early in his career, fronting such films as "October Sky" and "Bubble Boy." In 2001, Richard Kelly's "Donnie Darko" was released and the buzz began to build. Gyllenhall's portrayal of the twisted eponymous protagonist really shook audiences. Following this, he proceeded to display his diversity, delving into various character-strong performances in the likes of "Brokeback Mountain," "Zodiac" and "Jarhead" to great success. Sadly, things then peaked when he was cast in the ill-fated "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time." The film, his final supposed steps towards the tippy-top, was a disappointment. Leonard Martin described it as "a juvenile action-adventure" that "presents us with heroes and villains that are 'types' rather than genuine, fleshed-out characters one can care about." Gyllenhaal recovered, netting some of the best reviews of his career with his powerful performances in last year's "Prisoners," and this spring's thriller, "Enemy."

[Eric Eidelstein, Shipra Gupta, Brandom Latham, Oliver MacMahon and Nigel M. Smith contributed to this article.]

39 Comments

  • Sia | July 10, 2014 9:23 PMReply

    Great article and I agree with Jennifer Lawrence ! I'm getting tired of the Kristen Stewart Twilight hate PLEASE MOVE ON ALREADY !

  • Brian Winiarski | June 5, 2014 8:28 AMReply

    I was also referring to the success and failure of these people according to their ' levels of popularity amonst moviegoers, I just stated my opinions unclearly. I am sure I will someday see Kristen Stewart in a role other than Bella and sure she will do well. I was actually complaining mostly about the quality of writing and movies that our' modern society of so called multitaskers seem to prefer and not about the people cast in these movies. Tanning beds and social media are frying brains. All these actors and actresses are a success because they all are younger than me, have fairly easy jobs, and make more money off one movie than I have made in the past 25 yrs of working, risking my life, and injuring myself in factories, coal mines, and construction. Almost everyone that has anything to do with entertainment(movies, music, sports, etc.) is very successful compared to the rest of us(workers, nurses, teachers, etc.) .

  • @ Brian | June 5, 2014 12:52 PM

    I understand now. Unfortunately, that's the movie biz for you.... :/

  • Brian Winiarski | June 4, 2014 2:57 PMReply

    I cannot understand why the three you list as failures would be considered worse than Kristen Stewart. They can each play various characters. She plays the same spoiled, depressed, manic,whiny,victimized, and pitiful character in all her roles. She is pretty, and teenage girls love her, but they also think it is cool to walk in front of vehicles while facebooking on a smartphone. I have nothing against Miss Stewart, but the intelligence of our' society is decreasing rapidly by the millisecond, and I hope this is not going to carry over into our' taste in movies and characters so quickly. If it does, There will be a multitude of teenage writers and directors hitting the scene soon, and intelligent adults with dumb phones will be quickly weened out. We may have to move to Canada, or China, or Russia, or anywhere that smart people with dumb phones are still welcome.

  • @ Brian | June 4, 2014 3:45 PM

    Sorry, correcting myself -- * she plays an assistant to an actress, not an actress. Although in yet another upcoming film opposite Julianne Moore, she DOES play an actress who is far from whiny and depressed.

  • @ Brian | June 4, 2014 3:42 PM

    First, unfortunately you are using a cliched description of Stewart's roles. Really, just because she played Bella Swan for 5 movies, a character similar to what you've described, does not mean ALL her characters are like that. In the last four months she has, to increasingly excellent reviews, played a military guard and an actress who, by all accounts, is the life of the film. You will also be able to see her soon enough in an action/comedy.

    Second, the article is not passing judgment on those three "failures" in terms of their talent. It is discussing their failure to really be a blockbuster threat. Whatever else you think about Stewart, she, and the others on that list, have successfully transitioned back and forth between indies and bigger box office blockbusters.

  • Jennifer | June 4, 2014 2:47 PMReply

    My question is why some people are talking about Pattinson, he was not an indie actor

  • Kate | June 5, 2014 2:22 PM

    To @PATRON ................."GUEST | JUNIO Regardless of what you think of Kristen Stewart's performance as Bella Swan in the hit "Twilight" film series" Robert Pattinson did the same Twilight Saga and yet there are no such comments on articles about him like this. Right Indiewire? your agenda..."

    That poster wasn't a Kristen Stewart fan

  • @ Patron | June 4, 2014 3:43 PM

    No, Copy/Paste Troll, the only reason he is brought up is because embarrassing "fans" like you pollute all articles about Stewart.

  • Patron | June 4, 2014 3:21 PM

    Kristen Stewart fans are obsessed with him. They can't let go of him, even though he dumped her over a year ago. They act like the girls who get kicked off The Bachelor.

    Get some dignity, girls. It's not a competition.

  • Bob | June 4, 2014 2:32 PMReply

    Im boring read those crZy robsessed comments......blehhhhh

  • TimParker | June 4, 2014 12:15 PMReply

    In defense of Hayden Christensen, he was excellent in Shattered Glass, the story of the magazine writer whose outrageous stories ended up being completely fabricated. It was a well done movie but his performance really made it work.
    So I think with the right material he can be good.

  • nicole | June 3, 2014 11:12 PMReply

    God, this and theplaylist's comments section have become a joke. Just like the websites themselves.

  • kaio | June 3, 2014 9:44 PMReply

    fassbender is the best he is an amazing actor and can play the role that he wants! he can do anything

  • Cricket | June 3, 2014 8:45 PMReply

    Kirsten Dunst? Her career is dead nowadays, didn't INDIEWIRE get the memo? What was the last relevant or successful movie headlined by Kiki? I hear crickets... How much did Kiki's agent pay for this piece?

  • ED | June 3, 2014 8:28 PMReply

    I cannot believe this comment section...

  • Kate | June 4, 2014 1:47 AM

    @LANE

    Are you describing yourself? ...You just described Rob fans/kristen haters. This has been going on for years now.

  • @ Lane | June 4, 2014 12:46 AM

    Well, Copy/Paste Troll, we all know which fanbase you shamefully represent with your vile bitterness on any Kristen Stewart article on the internet.

  • Lane | June 3, 2014 10:53 PM

    Kristen Stewart fans are way too over sensitive, they prove it in the comments sections all over the internet. They see her as some kind of perfect goddess, and no one is allowed to have a differing opinion. If you do, you're automatically labeled a "hater," and they start attacking you.

    Here's an example. Over the weekend, Cosmopolitan magazine had an article called "25 ways you can tell he's cheating on you," and they used a pic of Kristen and Rupert Sanders dry humping on the side of the road for an illustration.

    Her fans took to twitter, threatening Cosmo and screaming for them to remove the pic. Like that's going to make everyone have amnesia. When those pics first came out in US Weekly, her fans employed #OperationHideUsWeekly, and went all over stores, taking the magazine and hiding it in different parts of the store, like the frozen food section. They took pics of themselves doing this and then tweeted those. Just plain crazy. That's her fanbase.

  • brianna | June 3, 2014 9:01 PM

    When twihards enter the site it's like the Twilight Zone. Things go down the toilet pretty soon.

  • NEW YORK | June 3, 2014 8:17 PMReply

    Poor RPatz butthurt hags invading this site because they're talking about KStew. No one cares about your obscure supporting actor. Deal with it.

  • Seattle | June 3, 2014 6:42 PMReply

    Poor Hayden has had the worst career. He's a model with very limited acting ability. Reminds me somewhat of Garrett Hedlund. They just don't have the charisma to be leading men. Emile is another one who is a character actor. He's good, he's just not good enough to carry a film on his own.

    And I think one of the reasons Kristen Stewart got good reviews for Sils Maria is precisely because she was in the supporting role. She's another character actress who fell into the lead of Twilight to play the plain, ordinary girl role. That is her niche, not the charismatic leading lady.

  • CURZONSTREET | June 3, 2014 8:11 PM

    Right CRUZONSTREET ? lmao Insecure much? RPatz is just reasonable in supporting roles. Why? No charisma, no talent, he can't carry a movie by himself. You confirmed it. LMAO. Don't be jealous of Garrett Hedlund's brilliant career. He's the lead in a franchise now so, yeah, your guy is not doing so well in comparison. Try harder.

  • Summer | June 3, 2014 4:37 PMReply

    James McAvoy is the most successful actor of his generation. The end.

  • Brian | June 3, 2014 6:25 PM

    Agreed.

    My favourite actor since 2008, when Atonement came out.

  • GUEST | June 3, 2014 4:08 PMReply

    "Regardless of what you think of Kristen Stewart's performance as Bella Swan in the hit "Twilight" film series" Robert Pattinson did the same Twilight Saga and yet there are no such comments on articles about him like this. Right Indiewire? your agenda....

  • @ Check Yourself | June 4, 2014 5:20 PM

    Yikes. Too bad for you a short list of directors for the Snow White sequel has just leaked via Deadline. Looks like you're wrong, once again.

  • @Johnson/Check Yourself (Same Lame Poster) | June 4, 2014 12:03 PM

    Well, if SWATH2 doesn't happen, she always has her NEW Lionsgate film, American Ultra, which the CEO of Lionsgate recently touted as a potential franchise. Throw in Equals, and Clouds of Sils Maria, etc., and it seems that plenty of respected directors and studios do want to work with her, and keep doing so. Stay pressed, as always. She proves you wrong at every turn. How did your 10 months of screeching that she is nothing more than "a piece of furniture" in Clouds of Sils Maria turn out for you? All that whining we heard from you on every site about how her role is a total nobody, how she has no lines and just stands there...how embarrassing for you. So you go ahead and keep spewing your pathetic vitriol. Like I said, she has always, and will continue to prove your wrong.

  • guest | June 4, 2014 11:43 AM

    to CHECK YOURSELF ...you are obviously too pressed. lol And Rob is doing blockbuster? Robsessed said "Rob is the new Box Office King" hahahahah . He doesn't seem to be landing any big budget films with major studios the way Andrew G and Channing Tatum are, and they are the ones you should be comparing him to. he's gonna lose that contest, too, tho..

    AND PLEASE, DO NOT WORRY ABOUT KRISTEN. SHE IS OK. Everyone knows Kristen is an indie actress. Here's an example. Walter Salles invited her after he´s seen her in Into The Wild. They´ve met shortly after Twilight shootings wrapped in early 2008. She has refused big blockbusters that have been offered to her in order to be in this film.

    And also Twi was a small indie movie made on a very small budget, small studio. It was never supposed to be a big as it is, but it exploded.

    Kristen is offered many roles. She will only accept parts that she feels 'compelled' to do. She is not after money---if a blockbuster movie part is portrayed by Kristen---she chose the part because of the character and not the money.THAT is a FACT!

  • TR | June 4, 2014 1:55 AM

    WTF are you talking about? What the hell is wrong with you? What does this have anything to do with Pattinson?

    Oh man, You guys are totally delusionals...

  • Johnson | June 4, 2014 12:55 AM

    Oh that's right, Stewart has one Worst Actress Razzie for Breaking Dawn and one for SWATH. That makes two, any way you count it. And who cares if Sandra Bullock has one? She also has an Oscar, something Stewart lacks. She's never even had a nomination. So that argument doesn't hold water.

    And where is that SWATH sequel? Since when does a studio ever drag its feet when they think they can have a successful franchise? Never. Except for SWATH 2, which they just won't go ahead with. Wonder why that is? Maybe because their Snow White showed that she wasn't that pure? Maybe her getting caught having an affair with her director derailed her career for a good 18 months and totally destroyed the sequel possibility? Too bad for all the people who would be employed by Universal for SW2. One person's screw up doesn't just effect them.

  • Fro | June 4, 2014 12:17 AM

    Wow, "Check Yourself," I can feel your butthurt from way over here. Stay pressed. How long did it take you to write up that essay to make yourself feel better after Kristen left Cannes with RAVE reviews for her performance in Clouds of Sils Maria. Not one negative comment about her performance and she was actually mentioned in quite a few prediction lists for the Best Actress award. And she was there for ONE day and she had ONE film. And Pattinson? Oh, he had a cameo in Maps to The Stars and he played a dimwit in The Rover (which received even worse reviews than Maps to The Stars). But he got good to okay reviews for playing a half-wit, borderline mentally handicapped moron so there's that. Focus on the positives!

    Kristen didn't WIN two Razzies for Twi. She was nominated, along with Robert Pattinson and Taylor Lautner. Get your facts straight. And being nominated (or even winning) a Razzie doesn't mean anything. EVERYONE knows that the Razzies are a big joke, except for Robert Pattinson fans apparently. You guys have been pressed for 5 years and counting. I'd think you would be happy. Isn't his career "on fire"? Isn't he on the verge of winning 100 Academy Awards for every single movie he signs up for? Isn't he working with great, legendary directors (that half of you didn't even know existed until he signed on for one of their movies)? If his career is so awesome and if he's better than Kstew (who is 4 years his junior), then why are you people in the comments sections of every single article written about her? It's like clockwork for you guys, isn't it? You mad that she hasn't faded into obscurity? You mad that her one day appearance at Cannes received more buzz than his, what, 4 or 5 days there? Lol.

    Don't forget. Pattinson would be nothing without Twilight. And he wouldn't have been cast in Twilight if it weren't for Kristen, who was a major reason as to why he got cast. Don't forget that Kristen has had a 14 year indie/mainstream career before Twilight as opposed to Pattinson who was in a few flops and had a minor role in one Harry Potter movie. How quickly you fans forget. See, there wouldn't be chaos in Indiewire and Playlist's comment sections if Pattinson's tangent of deranged fangirls didn't run to the comment sections to talk smack about Kristen Stewart whenever she's as much as mentioned in an article. As a result, we wouldn't have to respond. The world keeps on spinning. You're angry because Indiewire included her in a list of indie actors who transitioned to Blockbusters? Isn't that literally exactly what she did??

    Stay bitter.

  • LK | June 3, 2014 11:47 PM

    Dear Check Yourself, you argument is invalid. Sandra Bullock has a razzie and she's BY FAR a much better actress than no razzie Rpatz. Julianne Moore won the award for best actress, not Rpatz or even the movie itself, it was Julianne's acting alone. And if we were to compare Cannes this year, it is pretty safe to say (and critics would agree with me) that Kristen received much better reviews than Rpatz and his two movies.

  • Check yourself | June 3, 2014 6:25 PM

    Kristen has won two Razzies for Worst Actress from the Twi franchise, Pattinson hasn't won any for worst actor. That's the difference.

    Your agenda is transparent. You try to make everything into a competition between an actor and an actress, which is just dumb. And unfortunately for you, it's a contest you always lose. Every one of Pattinson's post franchise films has premiered at Cannes. She can't make that claim. And one of the films he was in won the Best Actress award for his co-star, Julianne Moore. CoSM won nothing from the Cannes jury.

    He's worked with Cronenberg twice, she's never been hired by the same director twice, even though she's made over 35 films. He's working with auteurs like Herzog, Michod, and Gray, she's working with first timers and guys who've had flop indies. She doesn't seem to be landing any big budget films with major studios the way Jennifer Lawrence and Shailene Woodly are, and they are the ones you should be comparing her to. She's gonna lose that contest, too, tho.

  • Summer | June 3, 2014 4:32 PM

    Lol I’ve noticed in the comments section lately that you Stewart fans have some serious bitter vendetta against Pattinson. Relax. Chill. Take a deep breath. It's not as serious as you think. They both moving on Twilight successfully.

  • Yesac | June 3, 2014 3:01 PMReply

    What, no Julianne Moore?

  • Sandy | June 3, 2014 3:59 PM

    Julianne Moore is an even more special case. Actors who started in soap operas and made it big. The list is probably much longer than most people think.

  • bobby | June 3, 2014 2:55 PMReply

    And who cares about blockbusters? Not me. Way to condemn talented actors for factors that they are not guilty about. Shame.

  • Neb | June 3, 2014 2:13 PMReply

    Man, great list guys! It's literally perfect -- almost.

    Sylvester Stallone is probably the first and best example of someone transitioning from true independence to blockbuster status with the indie-turned-franchise "Rocky." He wrote it and refused to sell it to the studio unless he starred in it, turning it into an ultra low-budget production without enough funding for more than one take on the film's most important scene (when Rocky tells Adrian he just wants to go the distance -- yes, that was one take).

    Then that very same film launched him into superstar status, crowning him the greatest action hero of all time (sorry Arnold) who still writes and stars in most of his films. He even had a fall from grace in the late '90s/early aughts similar to his iconic character, only to recover spectacularly with none other than the last -- and second best -- "Rocky" film.

    With a budget far less than "12 Years a Slave" and a franchise with just as many entries as "Star Wars," Stallone and "Rocky" seem like the perfect fit -- the model even -- for this list. If only there was a way to reverse time and include it. Oh well.