Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
Celebrating 17 Years of Film.Biz.Fans.
by Taylor Lindsay
March 17, 2014 10:33 AM
12 Comments
  • |

A Christian Critic Defends 'Wolf' and 'Nymphomaniac': 'These movies tell the truth'

With the release of the classic bible-story film "Noah" next week, Christians are gearing up to head to the theater. Between the close scrutiny the film has already received and the debates as to how much it aligns with the Bible, religious audiences are eager to weigh in on how much truth is here, and just how much accolade the epic merits.

Meanwhile, "The Wolf of Wall Street" is still lingering in theaters and "Nymphomaniac" has about four different release dates (between parts 1 and 2 and VOD) over the span of the coming month. And among other popular 2013 films, the R-rated case study of porn "Don Jon" just arrived to Netflix.

Most or all of the above seem offhand like they shouldn’t be part of the Christian critic’s cinema diet, and in sum, it’s mostly thanks to that R-rated material or associated thematic labels like "porn," "sex," and "drug content." But if you look at little closer at these recent attractions, making a conscious effort to withhold judgment, the reward rises to the surface. In other words, don’t run the other way because of the R rating, but check them out for the invaluable thing that they do: these movies tell the truth.

To be sure, there is typically a lot of heavy "thematic" material in R-rated flicks in general (or maybe just violence and sex). It’s stuff that might offend, upset or disturb, but it’s also the "stuff" of cautionary tales, important true stories, and stories that pack a punch with a purpose. So I promise, I’m not saying that every R-rated movie out there should be checked out just to see if there’s any "truth" in it. But here’s the thing about a truthful movie: discussing it in its context can open up a world of ways to talk about truth in another context. Good film criticism bears in this in mind. A movie that is accurate to life and artful in that conveyance probably does not just entertain, but also might nudge the viewer to look inward and learn something about himself.

While that may appear a little obvious, it seems like a Christian critic might hit a wall when the R-rated stuff comes in. But consider for a moment why R-ratings exist. Films with this label don’t exactly trick you into thinking the movie you’re about to see is 100% innocuous. For instance, "The Passion of the Christ" didn’t cut corners on showing the darkness and morbidity of Christ’s death. That rating isn’t just so you know not to take a 13-year-old to this particular movie, but so that you can avoid films that include material that you yourself are sensitive to. There are countless people (religious and not) who can’t (and shouldn’t) handle a movie full of demonic possession or evil other-worldliness. For me, vivid depictions of physical abuse are hard to watch. While that should wall off some films on a person-by-person basis, it’s too big a blanket statement to say all films in the controversial category should be avoided. The films that seek to carve out a point are possibly even more likely to use tools that fall into that R-rated category -- even so, isn’t a strongly conveyed truth something that we should at least be aware of? Can’t it be held up as common ground and a culture-making conversation topic?

These movies are tools for Christians to talk, in the context of one truthful depiction of reality, about the truth we want to share. And as these particular films and shows all have a sort of notoriety, we're engaging right at the nexus of the of the cultural conversation by bringing them up. All you need is Google to know that there’s porn, there’s sex, and there’s drugs in "Wolf," "Nympho" and "Don Jon." But what else? All these films have scored highly on Rotten Tomatoes (with over 75% aggregate "approval rating"), which is impossible without a richly layered message. What else are these films saying?

"Don Jon"

"The Wolf of Wall Street" is notoriously intense and then some. Critical audiences zeroed in quickly on the copious nude bodies and the crack businessmen snorted off of a number of creatively controversial surfaces. But to taboo the movie for the method it used to tell this particular story is to miss the point. Leonardo DiCaprio has more than once deliberately slowed down and made eye contact during interviews to say this:, the movie is not an ode to the lifestyle of Jordan Belfort and the Wall Street culture therein, but was meant instead to provoke a strong reaction to the prevailing chaos and corruption. And that’s what it does -- the building conclusion hits you with a brutal depiction of failure, wrongness and a fall after taking you through the joyride of a twisted American dream. Lots of movies can regurgitate the "crime doesn’t pay" message, but "Wolf" takes both revel-some debauching and sobering misery and creates an experience raunchy and wrenching. Its conclusion is not vague and it leaves nothing "up to you to decide" -- it hits hard.

12 Comments

  • j | April 2, 2014 5:43 PMReply

    There may be truth in these films but just keep in mind this is entertainment .If you want real truth film probably isn't the best place to go .Hollywood is filled with half truthes and whole lies wolf of wall street .Only touched upon the excess of jordan belforts life it didn't touch upon the truth of the matter which was the guy was a crook and a slick talking swindler .It just sensationalized the guys exploits .If hollywood really had a moral bone in its body and cared about truth you would of saw a different tale being told .
    Nympho just showed porn dressed up to kind of mean something other than porn.

  • jervaise brooke hamster | March 18, 2014 10:18 PMReply

    Pornography is the truth, Hollywood is lies and hypocrisy.

  • David | March 18, 2014 10:44 AMReply

    I'm a Christian and a filmmaker (not to be confused with a "Christian filmmaker") and I really appreciate this article. In college I struggled with the idea of having sex/drugs/language in my films, but it hit me one day that the biggest danger of any artist is to not be truthful. I say danger because so many films get made that are manipulative, propaganda filled , and gloss over what is real. By doing so, the audience gets a false perception of reality, and then is limited in their ability to find deeper truths about life and, ultimately, themselves. That is the real danger. I believe myself to be a storyteller. At the end of the day, my duty is to serve the story/characters accurately and honestly. I make movies for everyone because God loves everyone, not just Christians. Every single person has a story. And every single person has something meaningful and beautiful about them that we can learn from.

  • Jon | March 18, 2014 12:11 AMReply

    I think you missed the main point of Nyph()maniac (at least in part 1) ***** SPOILER ALERT ***** and that is contained in one word: polyphony, which parallels Joe's model of existence, the harmonious combining of many different persons as one. This perhaps elevates her to some kind of fulfillment and accomplishment beyond what most people could ever achieve. She is perhaps a sexual genius. It is only the disdain and peer pressure of "society" (perhaps one of lesser intellect) that brings her down into a place of shame and self loathing. Though I haven't seen part 2.

  • Jon | March 17, 2014 11:56 PMReply

    Most people can't handle the truth. They live in fairy tales.

  • dennis | March 17, 2014 8:56 PMReply

    These are just about the lamest and most irrelevant excuses possible for movies one can pull a "Christian" message. On the other hand, if the goal is to find movies that have the maximum amount of "sinful" titillation followed by a little pipsqueak of "But all that stuff is bad!," then by all means, knock yourself out. I mean, "Wolf" barely suggests its hero is sorry, or suffers, for all the spiritual emptiness of his lavish lifestyle or ripping off other people. (Which is apt, I suppose, but it sure sounds like the real-life guy isn't apologetic at all.) And the only real lesson to be drawn from "Nymphomaniac" is (as his prior films proved as well) that Lars von Trier doesn't like sex and thinks it's unfulfilling. But what has he ever suggested IS fulfilling? Masochistic suffering and murderous revenge? He's just a misanthrope. Both of these movies have their points of interest, but reading them as tools for Christian instruction is about the silliest means of analysis. I'm not saying that's true with other movies--just that these two are particularly poor choices for that approach.

  • GetReal | March 17, 2014 6:55 PMReply

    Christians will use any excuse to watch porn

  • sammijo | March 17, 2014 3:33 PMReply

    As a Christian, the only thing that offends me about Wolf is that the dirtbag who ripped off so many people, and didn't serve near enough penalty for it, is now making money off his bad deeds. THAT is extremely offensive. That's not to say the movie isn't well made, well acted, etc. I just wish a creep wasn't furthering his financial success off the stories of people he already exploited.

  • Jon | March 17, 2014 11:59 PM

    But that reflects reality. The offense there is what the filmmakers intended.

  • Joe H. | March 17, 2014 12:05 PMReply

    As a Christian, I love this article. And I can't wait to see Nymphomaniac. Already saw and loved Wolf of Wall Street.

  • Mitch Huttema | March 17, 2014 11:22 AMReply

    This is an excellent article, my friend. As a Christian myself, I completely back you on this article. It's great to hear a Christian presence on this site. Keep up the great work.

  • Refn270 | March 17, 2014 11:14 AMReply

    Very well written article.