The lab itself owed its existence to and was centered around the end of things -- the decline of the era in which anyone aside from an ever-smaller fraction of filmmakers could count on even making the costs of a feature back the conventional way, through an all-rights sale to a distributor. There are more and more films being made every year -- 50,000 globally was the number being thrown about -- and there's more and more competition for viewer attention from television, games, the internet and beyond. Companies no longer have the need nor the ability to spend the equivalent amount on features. If independent film is going to have a chance to be something other than a hobby, if filmmakers are going to be able to have, if not millions of dollars, at least the hope of a sustainable career pursuing their passion, then something has to change.
With that spirit in mind, the labs were devised to be as practical an event as possible, with the 12 invited projects in various stages of production scheduled to leave on May 5 with an actionable strategy in place, should they choose to use it, for how to fully or partially direct distribute their films.
As is fitting for the Bay Area, much of the language thrown around during four days densely packed with meetings and presentations was borrowed from Silicon Valley, and most of the techniques discussed revolved around how technology now allows filmmakers direct communication with their audience. Hope spoke of "rapid prototyping" and "emerging markets," "infrastructure" and "multiple iterations," while elsewhere the keyword was that current favorite of the tech industry, "disruptive." And looking at the numbers in the current market, creators are sorely in need of disruption -- among the 17 hard truths Hope provided in his three-part opening day talk was the fact that "artists and their supporters are rarely the primary financial beneficiaries of their work," something that retaining their rights could potentially change.
While some of the meetings were private, others aspects of the lab were open to the press and offered up a few recurring themes:
Documentaries are leading the way in direct distribution and community building. Though all the projects in the lab were narrative films, when Paradigm Consulting's Peter Broderick offered up successful direct distribution case studies in his talk, the examples were mainly nonfiction -- a doc on raw food that sold thousands of copies after offering up the film for free streaming for a week, another on Estonian music that featured CDs for purchase on their website alongside their DVD. A presenter from communications strategists Active Voice spoke about how nonprofits have become very savvy about films reaching out to their communities, a now familiar doc strategy, but that there's still untapped potential for narratives to be able to do this with their capacity to reach a new and broader audience.
Filmmakers need to look outside the film world. Hope described the film world as siloed, with tendencies toward isolation from other mediums and communities and, because of it, a certain limited way of thinking about the industry's problems -- something he was actively trying to remedy by bringing film together with the tech world. Broderick cited Amanda Palmer's million dollar Kickstarter campaign as one from which filmmakers could learn in the way she phrased her appeal for funding and how she continues to engage with her fans. Filmmaker Adam Collis, who was one of the 12 participants as well as a speaker, followed up his first feature in 2000 by getting an M.B.A., and delved into the business side of direct distribution as something that would shift the potential for reward for a film's success away from a distributor to the financiers already bearing up most of the risk.
Filmmakers also need to start planning and budgeting for distribution alongside production. Films will still be snapped up at Sundance and given traditional theatrical releases, but for most others, direct distribution is a reality that needs to be considered alongside production costs and strategy from the outset. Olson mentioned consulting with publicists before the casting process now, to understand the impact pursuing someone for their recognizability will actually have, while Pope noted that PR is just a 20th the cost of marketing and often more effective. Broderick stressed that these costs needed to be considered earlier in the process, and that a filmmaker shouldn't feel the need to have to do everything him or herself, but should be ready to bring on partners who are experts at the roles being delegated -- even if that comes down to something as simple as the aforementioned Amanda Palmer hiring someone to manage her Facebook page.