Celebrating 17 Years of Film.Biz.Fans.
by Alison Willmore
March 2, 2012 6:10 PM
6 Comments
  • |

Is 'The River' Proof That Found Footage Shows Can't Work?

Eloise Mumford as Lena Landry in 'The River' ABC
While I wouldn't describe "The River," which airs Tuesdays at 9pm on ABC, as a particularly good show -- and its wan ratings indicate that most people feel the same way -- it's a great guilty pleasure thanks to the strange contortions it has to go through to keep up its found-footage premise.

"The River" was created by Oren Peli, the writer/director of low-budget phenom "Paranormal Activity," and like that film it presents itself as an allegedly true mix of the paranormal and the mundane shot on surveillance cameras and manned ones. And like that film, it raises the questions that tend come up in this horror subgenre -- why are these people sticking around through all of this supernatural scariness? and why do they keep filming through it? -- but then instead of killing off its characters or sending them off the grips of demonic possession it keeps going, episode after episode, until these issues no longer seem like plot holes and instead are more like proof of some shared psychosis.

The series follows the wife (Leslie Hope), grown son (Joe Anderson) and crew of Emmet Cole (Bruce Greenwood), the beloved explorer host

A crewmember dies in the first episode, which you'd think would give the others cause for concern, if only for insurance costs.
of a nature program entitled "The Undiscovered Country" as they travel in search of him after he goes missing in the Amazon. Lost for months, he's been considered dead until his emergency beacon suddenly goes off. The network that carried Cole's show is funding the rescue mission in hopes of making reality programming out of it, though it seems likely that if they find anything, it's going to be a corpse.

"This is the footage they left behind," the start of each episode warns of its gathering of would-be adventurers and what follows is meant to be edited together from what was grainily recorded by the cameras mounted around The Magus, the ship on which they're traveling, and what was shot by a shifting series of cameramen.

"The River" is strikingly close to the formula Peli used to such success in "Paranormal Activity" -- timestamps like "Day 22" and "6:20am" periodically appear on screen, we flick between different cameras (some using night vision) poised over different parts of the ship and often showing nothing spooky at all, and shots are set up so that negative space yawns ominously behind characters as they, say, focus on watching a video feed, oblivious.

Scares often build from simple starts, like the eyes on a doll suddenly flipping shut, and the monsters (there's a new one each week) are rarely glimpsed in full onscreen. "The River" cuts in older footage for backstory, and in addition to watching video feeds of their own shooting, they have a backlog of Cole's tapes they search through for clues.

Unless it's actually a scathing satire of reality TV, 'The River' makes a hilarious argument for how difficult a found footage take on an episodic show actually is.
A show like "The Office" is able to keep using the illusion of nonfiction because its conflicts and dramas are relatively normal and can unfold believably in front of its theoretical documentary crew, even if they've now been sticking around for a "Hoop Dreams"-worthy length of time. But "The River" is horror, and each new installment builds to some shrieky climax, and then returns to normal by the start of the next one. A crewmember dies in the first episode, which you'd think would give the others cause for concern, if only for what it might do to the production's insurance costs, but they keep noodling along, more determined than ever.

In the second episode a ghost almost pulls someone into an early grave, which if not enough to send everyone packing in the least should have sent the snide producer into a tizzy, looking for a way to send the shots back to his editor somewhere in the States. In the fourth they find someone hanging from a tree who's been suspended for months between life and death thanks to a curse, and hire him to be the secondary cameraman.

Unless the show is actually a scathing satire of ruthless reality TV pretending to be scary, it makes a hilarious argument for how difficult, if not impossible, a found footage take on an episodic show like this actually is. The format has its advantages, but in this case grows ever more ridiculous as it goes along. If this is found footage, why not just cut to the end, instead of including all this filler about family members bickering and scenes of someone playing the accordion? What kind of terrible fake editor did they hire?

You might also like:

6 Comments

  • Rake | March 14, 2012 1:58 PMReply

    I never watched any of the paranormal activity movies, but I love this show. Maybe it is a guilty pleasure but I would much rather tivo this show than another murder mystery cop show. I hate steady cam, but this is filmed just right that you don't even notice. I like it.

  • Dylan | March 3, 2012 8:30 AMReply

    Filmmaker RAPE AND SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL CORRUPTION, and we WONT STOP UNTIL EVERY FILMMAKER KNOWS THE "TRUTH".
    Just is NEWS.....Regarding the lawsuit against Sundance (2012 Abbinante vs. Sundance H12S00037) The lawsuit alleges that Sundance is committing fraud by not returning submission fees to filmmakers whos films were not screened and evaluated by Sundance.

    "Because Sundance has prior knowledge of the unmanageable volume of films received (11,700 films for the 2012 festival) and did not return fees to filmmakers whos films were not screened and evaluated, Sundance is guilty of fraud." quoted by Darryl Abbinante and continued to state "It's simply not humanly possible for any committee to screen and evaluate 11,700 films." Sadly, the judge ruled in favor of Sundance stating "Sundance is not legally required to screen and watch every film submission in it's entirety." The judge also stated "All Sundance has to do is watch 30 seconds of any film and then can decide to pass on it." After the judge made his statement, Adam Montgomery (present in court) openly made this statement: "I would watch about an hour of footage each day prior to the festival" which supported the judges statements. The judge said "if you can prove Sundance is not watching at least 30 seconds of each and every film submitted, then you can not prove fraud."

    So the mystery behind Sundance has been discovered. Sundance is not liable to watch every film submission from start to finish and evaluate them. This is information that would've been very useful to the over 11,700 filmmakers prior to them submitting their films and submissions fees to Sundance for the 2012 festival, bringing Sundance an additional income revenue of $500,000 to $625,000 for the 2012 season.

    Sundance is a well polished money making machine. They have found loop hole in the system and are exploiting filmmakers by the tens of thousands. I was one of them. I feel sorry for next year when (estimated) 13,500 filmmakers will blindly send in their films and submissions fees chasing a dream that no longer exists.

    As realized earlier, unless your film has an "A list" celebrity in it or you are a famous director (or the son or daughter of one) then you can only blame yourself for allowing Sundance to take money out of your pocket while you stand there scratching your head.

    Kudos to Sundance and their staff for effectively creating a business that thru the years grows larger every year, despite the recession, by continuing to dangle the carrot of success in front of every filmmaker's face with promises of discovery and a film sale. Pure Genius.

    Darryl Abbinante

    Indy Filmmaker

    Go to www.sundancefilmfestival2013.com for more info

  • Christopher Bell | March 3, 2012 3:50 AMReply

    Really digging the TV coverage. Good stuff Alison.

  • Jenny | March 3, 2012 12:19 AMReply

    Why do you even bother watching this show if all you have to say is negative?!! I actually happen to enjoy the show very much... I love all the twists & turns... Even the back stories on the characters are interesting, how it all ties together. My guess is, you never appreciated Lost either. Well please stick with The Office ... Maybe that'll make you happy.

  • Bob | March 3, 2012 2:39 PM

    This show stinks, it is so cliche in all its scare tactics it offends me as a viewer. People want a real writing on network tv not cheap rip offs from a collection of horror films put on tv thinking we as viewers will lap it up. With all the good tv shows that get cancelled, it would be a shame if this shows stays on the air for very long taking up a time slot.

  • Christopher Bell | March 3, 2012 3:51 AM

    Yup, because the extremely sappy and manipulative way Lost tied together was terrific writing. Not bullshit. Terrific writing.