Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
Celebrating 17 Years of Film.Biz.Fans.
by Eric Kohn
May 17, 2014 7:57 AM
  • |

Cannes Review: Robert Pattinson and Guy Pearce Can't Quite Salvage David Michod's 'The Rover'

Guy Pearce and Robert Pattinson in "The Rover."

The dirty, broken world at the center of David Michod's "The Rover," the Australian director's post-apocalyptic follow-up to his grisly 2010 crime drama "Animal Kingdom," is a familiar one. The dusty, empty landscape and cruel, humorless personalities populating its small ensemble immediately call to mind "Mad Max," while the prevalent despair suggests that pages have been borrowed from Cormac McCarthy's "The Road." Unfortunately, despite Michod's capability  to emulate these dreary worlds -- and formidable performances from "Animal Kingdom" star Guy Pearce and Robert Pattinson in his first substantial role post-"Twilight" -- the movie barely amounts to more than a homage.

An opening title card sets the action "10 years after the collapse," but nothing takes "The Rover" into science fiction. Instead, Michod constructs a violent road trip in which bearded loner Eric (Pearce) is on a mission to track down the bandits who stole his car. He joins forces with one of the culprits' wounded brother Rey (Pattinson), whom they left for dead before the story's opening. An introductory segment in which the trio of villains, led by Rey's brother Henry (Scoot McNairy, in a handful of scenes) holds promise; it finds the feuding men engaged in a car accident alternately shot from inside the vehicle and flying by the window of the ramshackle building where Eric sits with his drink and the sound of the crash is drowned out by blaring music. 

It's an oddly funny moment, followed by a suspenseful chase sequence as Eric jumps into the titular vehicle and briefly manages to chase them down. But few of the preceding scenes capture the same elements of surprise or suspense. Instead, as tight-lipped Eric continues on his quest with the bumbling Rey forced to accompany him, "The Rover" offers plenty of compelling ingredients dryly assembled along an unimaginative trajectory.

Nevertheless, Pearce's scowling appearance and relentless ability to force others to meet his demands—particularly in a sudden burst of violence when he seeks out a firearm—marks his strongest role since "Animal Kingdom," while Pattinson finally moves beyond wooden mannerisms to give his awkward character a pathetic, creepy demeanor. Leaving both the origin stories for both men largely up for interpretation, however, Michod (who co-wrote the story with regular collaborator Joel Edgerton) fails to make their plight engaging. Like its tattered setting, "The Rover" is scattered with intriguing ideas never successfully fleshed out: a woman at one outpost who keeps her dogs in cages to save them from scavengers and a motel shootout that manifests out of nowhere create the anticipation of peril lurking in every corner. They hint at the prospects of a well-honed thriller, and it's easy enough to get swept in the intensity of these moments.

However, the movie's harsh posturing never leads anywhere. Unlike John Hilcoat's 2005 Australian western "The Proposition," the outback doesn't have enough appeal on its own terms to justify the absence of story. Cinematographer Natasha Braier's yellow-brown imagery engenders a gravitas far deeper than any of the movie's slim developments. Instead, Michod relies on a series of basic vignettes. On more than one occasion, Eric and Rey engage in rambling fireside chats in between their adventures on the road. At one point, Michod's camera slowly pushes in Pattinson as he sits in their parked vehicle, singing falsetto to Keri Hilson's "Pretty Girl Rock" on the radio. It's a random tangent that doesn't deepen the proceedings or complicate the narrative in any particular way; like much of the "The Rover," it's a fragment incapable of latching onto a bigger picture.

Michod's commitment to unsympathetic storytelling and hardened characters allowed "Animal Kingdom" to maintain palpable dread at every moment. In "The Rover," the empty tension dissipates with time. Like the earlier movie, it culminates in an abrupt exchange of gunfire, but the meager payoff after such a blandly prolonged buildup can't compete. 

As one of the characters sighs that "not everything has to be about something," but "The Rover" never manages to manages to fully justify that excuse.

Grade: C+

"The Rover" premiered this week at the Cannes Film Festival. A24 will release it in the U.S. later this year.


  • Auteur | June 17, 2014 5:52 PMReply

    "A mesmerizing visionary achievement. The best post-apocolyptic movie since the original Mad Max. With the one-two punch of The Rover and Animal Kingdom, David Michod proves himself to be the most uncompromising director of his generation." --Quentin Tarantino

    I have to agree with Quentin, and disagree strongly with this review.

  • bjsmith | June 14, 2014 10:12 PMReply

    When will it ever be over? every time someone gives Robert Pattinson some praise, Kristen Stewart's fans chime in with their negative and hate filled remarks. In a recent interview Rob sees and no about all the negative stuff people say about him. But he just moves on. He has done pretty good in my opinion, I loved him in Cosmopolis and Bel Ami. Some of those scenes in Cosmopolis with Sarah Gadon and Paul Giamati are unforgettable. I wish critics and KS's fans would lighten up. What has ever done to you personally? Judge him fairly on his work not what you think his personal life is. Stop the hating and bullying.

  • Bourdain | May 21, 2014 9:21 PMReply

    Anyone who has seen Water for Elephants or Little Ashes knows Pattinson doesn't have "wooden mannerisms."

    And if you're basing that opinion on the Twilight franchise alone, he was playing the character of a vampire who is more like a marble statue than a human being, perfectly. He wasn't supposed to be highly active in that franchise, it was all about stillness. Too bad he did his job so well that some critics just didn't get it and can't get over it.

    And the singing in the car moment was meant to illustrate that Rey was just a kid, wanting to live in a simpler, happier time. It wasn't supposed to be a huge plot point. Your own expectations got in the way of your understanding and enjoyment of this film. Too bad for us.

  • old habits die hard | May 18, 2014 4:45 AMReply

    "Pattinson finally moves beyond wooden mannerisms to give his awkward character a pathetic, creepy demeanor."
    you should have started from this line, then we would know the author was one of those haters that can't forgive RP his Twilight success and still hate everyone and everything the actor touches... even Guy Pearce, poor Guy. one more thing, next time you try to review the movie, please, make some research to know what a director has to say about his work. "...but nothing takes "The Rover" into science fiction"... this is really embarrassing...

  • confused | July 7, 2014 11:30 AM

    @seriously, not a positive comment when he hasn't had wooden mannerisms,old habit's die hard, wasn't suggesting he went to ask the director, but maybe took the time to atleast research the director's explaination of the film before writting a review of a film he doesn't understand,which was posted on RT , which could effect peoples opinion, it's dissapointing but fine if someone doesn't like a film, but people expect a fair and proffessional opinion, "sci fi" I don't know if he's written this as he didn't like the film because it wasn't sci fi, but no one said it was supposed to be, so I'm not sure why he's included it,

  • Seriously | May 19, 2014 6:12 PM

    If you think about it, "moving beyond wooden mannerisms" is actually a positive observation. And why would you ask the dirctor about his work for a movie review? It's a movie review - the reviewer's POV matters more. If we go on asking the director, then it gonna be an interview, a feature article.

  • Twitch | May 17, 2014 3:41 PMReply

    As an existential western, it sounds like it accomplished what it set out to do. More of a character study that a straightforward plot film, I think it will be enjoyed for the performances and the compelling landscape. I much prefer this over Spiderman for example.

  • Guest | May 17, 2014 9:49 AMReply

    Potter and Twilight did a lot for him but his other choices leave a lot to be desired. He has done many films with sex and nudity that are either never shown or are on cable in the wee hours while the world is asleep. He may seem to be trying to prove his range in film but violence is not the way to go. I for one am very disappointed in him but then maybe this all the film industry has to offer.

  • Hypocrites | May 21, 2014 8:45 PM

    @Guest, I've seen you cut and paste this stupid comment on a dozen sites. But you have no problem with the deviant sex scenes Kristen Stewart has done. Funny. She got naked with two men and gave them simultaneous hand jobs in On The Road, and also got in bed with them naked and had a 3 some.

    She did more in that one film than Pattinson has done in his 4 films outside the Twi franchise. But you're obsessed with somehow trying to make it seem like he's done something wrong. I feel sorry for you.

    And why lie? He hasn't done "many" films with sex and nudity. There was 10 seconds of sex in Bel Ami, and they show that at all times on my cable TV, and almost no nudity in Cosmopolis, he had his clothes on most of the time. So that's 2 films with very brief nudity. Again, Stewart had much more nudity and deviant sex in OTR. She also gave James Gandolfini a lap dance where her ass hung out in WTTR, which they don't show on TV at all, at any time of the day or night because it's so very, very bad.

    I'm disappoint she gets any work at all, she's a wooden actress with very limited talent. All her indies have flopped and she has 2 Razzies for Worst Actress. Happy now?

  • popcorn | May 20, 2014 5:03 AM

    *Yawns* Are you copy-pasting this comment everywhere?

  • just me | May 18, 2014 4:47 AM

    and how do you know so much about him? while the world is asleep you are watching his old movies, aren't you?

  • Jay | May 17, 2014 12:18 PM

    Let me guess... you think he should do a romcom &/or a comic book movie. Stick with YA franchises since they're obviously what you know best