Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
Celebrating 17 Years of Film.Biz.Fans.
by Eric Kohn
May 23, 2012 12:37 PM
9 Comments
  • |

CANNES REVIEW: Why Walter Salles' 'On the Road' Adaptation Is Better Than You Think

Sam Riley in "On the Road."

Red flags go up when a filmmaker embarks on adapting a beloved classic. Walter Salles' long-gestating big screen treatment of "On the Road" spent years in development and the nearly-two-and-a-half hour treatment of Jack Kerouac's seminal novel of the Beat Generation invited immediate skepticism. Kerouac's autobiographical look at his friends and their journeys around the country in the late 1940s has become so closely identified with his prose that any attempt to replicate it would automatically create a certain distance from the material -- or it seemed. As it turns out, Salles' "On the Road" does the trick well enough. Overlong and unfocused in parts, Salles' adaptation nonetheless holds together about as well a movie can when the odds are so heavily stacked against it.

Like Salles' "The Motorcycle Diaries," the movie avoids falling apart from the outset by not taking the material for granted. Salles, working from Jose Rivera's screenplay, begins with a pensive snapshot of Kerouac alter ego Sal Paradise (Sam Riley) in the middle of his cross-country journey, hitching a ride and enjoying the open road. The atmosphere of his travels comes first, establishing the book's searching nature ahead of its loose plot. From that early point, "On the Road" adopts a serious, low-key approach to establishing Sal's world that keeps the characters grounded.

From its introductory scene, "On the Road" flashes back to five months earlier, when the New York-based Sal accepts an offer from his pal Dean Moriarty (Garrett Hedlund) to visit him in Denver. It's there that he meets Dean's enthusiastic lover Marylou (Kristen Stewart), to whom Sal finds himself increasingly drawn.

Joined on occasion by the Allen Gingsberg-inspired Carlo Marx (Tom Sturridge), the motley crew spends most of the movie raising a ruckus in small towns, getting hammered, having threesomes and talking about life. "The only people that interest me are the mad ones," says Dean. As the comparatively shy Sal looks up to his friend to follow that logic, "On the Road" enlivens their adventures with a steadily engaging mood.

But that owes more to ingredients that make the movie durable in individual moments than anything from the original book. The filmmaker's use of handheld camerawork, a jazzy soundtrack and all-around committed performances help "On the Road" remain steadily watchable even as it meanders through a problematic middle section.

Which is not to say its flaws are invisible: Tangents involving a visit the group pays to William S. Burroughs (Viggo Mortensen, making an extended cameo) and the marital issues that Dean faces with his estranged wife Camille (Kirsten Dunst in the Carolyn Cassidy role, fairly bland), drag the material in aimless directions. "On the Road" suffers from a deadening effect as it moves along to no particular conclusion other than Sal's decision to finally write his book. By its end, "On the Road" has made a case for how it can work as a movie and why certain aspects of it never will. In essence, the movie is about the book rather than a fleshed-out realization of it.

The novel's legacy aside, "On the Road" successfully showcases its main performances. Riley stands out in his Kerouac performance, which has a certain soulfulness that echoes his breakthrough turn in Anton Corbijn's "Control." Hedlund is sufficiently overconfident as Moriarty, but Riley's true counterpoint in the story comes from Stewart's achievement as the giddy, pleasure-seeking Marylou, a credible performance made particularly noteworthy for her current fame in the "Twilight" franchise; frequently going nude, speaking up and dominating most of her scenes, she buries her movie stardom with this refreshingly non-commercial gig.

In fact, the engine of "On the Road" largely stems from its lack of commerciality. It's usually a bad sign when any movie resorts to putting a writer in front of his typewriter as his prose takes the form of voiceover narration. But "On the Road" only does that near the very end, when it must inevitably arrive at the creation of the text. Before that point, Salles manages -- as he did with "The Motorcycle Diaries" -- to render most of the prose in experiential terms. In the process, the film gets weighed down by the idealism of the original work, but that's also exactly what allows it to convey the novel's sentiments.

Criticwire grade: B

HOW WILL IT PLAY? IFC Films picked up U.S. distribution rights ahead of the movie's premiere in competition at Cannes, where it received a mixed response from critics but played well enough to suggest it has potential for respectable theatrical returns when it opens later this year, although it may not continue that momentum into awards season.

9 Comments

  • Topi | December 2, 2012 9:05 AMReply

    Very uninspiring & moralizing film based on very inspiring novel. This article didn't prove the opposite.

  • paulette | August 28, 2012 7:19 PMReply

    LOL from this reviewer's pont of view Stewart's only good skill in the movie is 'going nude' and getting rid of her vampire flick character. Sure, sure. I've seen the movie and she's only bland, not horrible like in Twilight. The only one worth mentioning is Hedlund. Riley is also underwhealming as Sal.

  • Hannah | May 30, 2012 5:16 AMReply

    Great to see an un-biased review of the film. I'll be interested to see how it all plays out!

  • jingmei | May 23, 2012 9:23 PMReply

    Lightweights or many of Twilight fans should better not to watch this film, not suitable for them. Doesn't only mean they have no idea about Beat Generation and the historical cultural background, but even get any sense of what is true rebelling. They even don't willingly to recognize Kristen Stewart's in-depth kinda pre-mature portrait of the character. Happy to see this film eventually came, look forward to the gang of young talents especially my beloved Sam Riley, and Garrett Hedlund, both of whom get sexy voices have to mention. The low profile but mature ensemble of young cast, led by the hot (as I feel) inspiring Walter Salles, created a juste formidable fucking cool ambience.

  • Hannah | May 30, 2012 5:14 AM

    Re: your first statements - how can you make generalizations like that? Twilight fans range from all different ages (not just youth, which by your tone I can tell you are referring to), so to assume that they have "no idea about the Beat Generation" is simply ignorant. It is also ignorant to assume that while being young, one cannot know about the influence that the Beats had and culture they influenced. It is ridiculous to clump people into one big group, which I personally believe is something that the Beats - and their progressive ideas - would strongly agree with.

  • MDL | May 23, 2012 4:29 PMReply

    I don't think any book is 'unfilmable'. Instead some books are just not as suitable to film as they are to the page. One would think On The Road falls into this category, which is one reason it has taken so long. But that's not to say it won't still be a good movie in its own right.

  • Brady | May 23, 2012 2:46 PMReply

    Unfilmable material. Why do some nitwits stik w "bad cine material." Ego, ego.

  • dudeabides | May 23, 2012 1:17 PMReply

    THANK YOU! someone finally giving an unbiased review of the film! most people have been giving mixed to negative reviews because of their lack of knowledge of the original source. some people have been pointing out flaws that are actually to be with source material. Capote famously said that OTR was "typing, not writing". but from what i can tell of what Salles said at the press conference is that he has stayed true to Kerouac's style and vision. been waiting a long time for this film

  • jingmei | May 23, 2012 9:14 PM

    Completely agreed.