For indie filmmakers who are wondering when and how their big break will come, the route through which to get financing and distribution can be a very troublesome one to say the least. However, independent filmmaker Daryl Wein ("Breaking Upwards," "Lola Versus") has managed to overcome the countless obstacles by working with both VICE and AT&T, whose recent partnership aims to break new ground in the digital media world. Wein's past success in the romantic comedy genre may have cemented what seems like a mutually advantageous opportunity whereby product placement plays a role in the creation of his latest short film "Let's Get Digital." Check out the film, which stars Ryan Hansen ("Veronica Mars"), Jon Heder ("Napoleon Dynamite"), Zoe Lister-Jones ("Whitney"), and Megan Ferguson ("Love and Other Drugs"), below:
How exactly did you first get involved with the VICE/AT&T partnership?
Well, VICE was looking for filmmakers to take on this component of their campaign for the digital movement and I was in the mix for that and got the job, and at that point they pitched it to me as it being a...they wanted to do a short film that was inspired by this guy in real life they met who had met his now-girlfriend on an awkward double date and through a series of text messages and, you know, basically interacting through their phones and technology, ended up becoming a couple. So they were looking for a writer/director to fictionalize that story into a fun slice of life relationship comedy and luckily that's kind of what I do! So I was game for it, and that's kind of how it came to fruition.
Why did you specifically choose to partake in their initiative?
I thought it was a cool opportunity in between trying to get movies off the ground, which takes forever. I thought it would be fun as a filmmaker to make another short film, I hadn't made one in a while. And they were giving me a lot of creative freedom to basically write the short film kind of how I wanted to. You know, I had a few parameters, it being inspired obviously by this guy who went on an awkward double date, so there are a few plot points I had to hit, like him meeting her on an awkward double date, there being some crossover with his ex-girlfriend and he was also obsessed with cats. So those were kind of like the bullet points from the real story and they just said 'can you make a funny short film out of this?' I also was intrigued by it because it wasn't really trying to be an overt advertisement for AT&T. It was letting the technology be kind of subtly interwoven into the story and kind of into the backdrop, so you can really just sink into the characters and their relationship with each other and let the action and the characters really drive the story.
Aside from the financial benefit in having them back you, what have you found was the biggest asset in having a company like AT&T behind you and your film?
Well, I think they're great because they're one of the biggest technology providers out there -- I'm actually with AT&T as a cell phone user, coincidentally, which I don't even know if they knew. You know, I think they have a big following. I think there's a major crossover right now with digital technology and film and all the different outlets that people are starting to consume content through. You know it's just growing more and more, people watching film and TV on their phones and on their TVs and on their computers through all the different platforms. So it was exciting to me in that regard from a creative standpoint that we can make a fun, cool short film that is smart and funny but it would get out there in a big way.
What are some of the downsides of having a big company backing your film?
Well, you know, the conventional downsides are always going to be there's more cooks in the kitchen. And as a filmmaker, you have to weigh a lot of options and debate ideas. You're not the sole decision maker. If you were making your own independent film, whether it's a short or a feature, you're usually in your own bubble, and that can be a benefit on the one hand in that you maintain 100% creative control, but it could also be its own downfall in that you don't have anyone else to bounce ideas off of and help elevate your vision. So I'm always kind of about creative collaboration and wanting to hear other ideas. I think it can kind of go both ways, but in this process I had a great time and I think it was a nice healthy collaboration of AT&T really kind of letting us do our thing and it was more of letting VICE as the production company and me as the filmmaker kind of assemble the team that we wanted and write the story kind of how we saw it, being funny and interesting and commercial at the same time.
How has the creative development of the film been affected given that you had to include some product placement?
It was totally cool. There was never any overt demand for product placement, other than they meet, which was kind of inspired by the real story, through interacting with their phones, which to me, feels very current and relevant to the ways in which we all communicate nowadays anyway. To me, that's secondary to how these two people were falling in love more from a personality standpoint and having similar interests and sense of humor and whatnot. The phones were really just the mode of communication for them to be able to fall for each other. So to me it was just kind of an organic element to the story that I was allowed to use it kind of how I wanted to in the fictionalization of how they came together.
Were you encouraged to focus specifically on the romantic comedy genre or did you have leeway when it came to choice of genre and content?
Yeah, they wanted the movie to be a relationship comedy with a romantic element to it. That was the realm that they wanted this to fit into tonally, so I went full on in that direction of two people falling for each other. There's funny aspects, there's everyday relationship kaffufels and arguments and co-dependent issues. Yeah, it was very much in my wheel house of experience in relationships.