Celebrating 17 Years of Film.Biz.Fans.
by Peter Knegt
February 5, 2013 11:24 AM
6 Comments
  • |

For Your Consideration: 5 Oscar Categories That Could (Pretty Much) Go Any Which Way

Tommy Lee Jones in "Lincoln"
So, it seems we finally have a full-fledged frontrunner in the best picture race. The mystery was nice while it lasted, and it's certainly been a while since it took all the way to February to have a conifident sense of who might win Oscar's big prize (for those not paying attention, Ben Affleck won the DGA on Saturday night -- suggesting "Argo" is likely heading for a best picture win despite Affleck not getting a best director nomination). But those of you still looking for some true suspense on Oscar night, never fear.

There's still an uncharacteristically high amount of categories where two, three or even all the contenders have totally reasonable shots at winning. We offer five examples of such below (but there's actually a few more where they came from). Indiewire will offer full on predictions for every category in the coming weeks, but for now here's five we're having issues predicting:

1. Best Supporting Actor
A five man race! This category is probably the toughest acting award to call in a good decade, or at least since 2008, when the best supporting actress race was a genuine 4-way race between Tilda Swinton, Ruby Dee, Amy Ryan and Cate Blanchett. That race saw Swinton win the BAFTA, Dee win the SAG, Ryan win the Critics Choice and Blanchett win the Golden Globe. In the end, Swinton won the Oscar.  Who will do so in this case in anybody's guess.

Robert DeNiro in 'Silver Linings Playbook'
The extra weirdness here is that all 5 nominees have already one -- an Oscar first. The sentimental choice is probably Robert DeNiro for "Silver Linings Playbook," since he hasn't won in 30+ years and is nominated for a film the Academy clearly loves (they gave it nods in all the acting categories, something that also hasn't happened in over 3 decades). But DeNiro has already won two, so he's hardly in desperate need of an Oscar. He also hasn't won any of the precursors. Those went to Christoph Waltz (Golden Globe), Phillip Seymour Hoffman (Critics Choice) and Tommy Lee Jones (SAG). We won't know who wins BAFTA until next week, but if it's one of those 3 men, consider them the narrow favorite (notably DeNiro wasn't even nominated there, or at the Golden Globes). There's also Alan Arkin, who could ride an "Argo" wave to a win (if he wins BAFTA, watch out). But his performance is inarguably the slightest of the five, and he just won six years ago for "Little Miss Sunshine." So Arkin and probably Waltz (who won just three years ago, for another Tarantino film) -- while feasible winners -- are the least likely.

Which leaves Jones, Hoffman and DeNiro. Entirely convicing arguments could be made for all three. As noted, the lack of precursor support goes against DeNiro, but it's the kind of year where that doesn't seem to matter. SAG winner Jones hasn't won in 2 decades and is in the most nominated film at this year's Oscars, but he may or may not have hurt by not showing up to make a speech at the SAGs, or by his sourpuss face at the Globes that became a much-shared internet gif. Hoffman is the only one not in a best picture nominated film, and one the Academy snubbed outside of the acting races altogether. But he also gives what many agree is the by far the best performance of the five...  WHO KNOWS!?

You might also like:

6 Comments

  • Roberto | February 13, 2013 11:02 PMReply

    What about Best Animated Film?
    It is also a 3-4 way race. Although Brave won the BAFTA and the Globe... I wouldn't be surprised to see Frankenweenie or Wreck-it Ralph take he award... maybe event ParaNorman as a pleasant upset

  • jm | February 5, 2013 1:55 PMReply

    Riva is definately the most deserving. Sometimes the Academy gets it right.

  • Corvo | February 5, 2013 11:42 AMReply

    RIVA will win.

  • Fariz | February 5, 2013 11:41 AMReply

    How about Best Director?

  • shelly | February 5, 2013 11:36 AMReply

    The score to Beasts is ok in context yet incredibly derivative when given a thorough listen. But most importantly NOT the kind of score the Academy would EVER award. They have never been the most forward thinking when it comes to score. Saying things like it would have won had it been nominated is absurd. That never would have happened. It invalidates almost every opinion that follows. No one is coming to Indiewire for thoughts on music.

  • Peter Knegt | February 5, 2013 12:02 PM

    The Academy awarded Reznor/Ross two years ago for a very forward-thinking score. If "Beasts" had been nominated, I indeed think it could have won -- and not just because it's deserving. But also because it would have been an opportunity to give the film an Oscar (which it probably won't get elsewhere). And not only the film, but Zeitlin himself, who co-wrote the score.