Thirty Something: Independent Film & IFP Evolve. But, What’s Next?
John Sayles, Maggie Renzi, Ira Deutchman, Scott Macaulay (background) and IFP Founder Sandra Schulberg, at the opening night of the IFP event in 2007. Photo by Brian Brooks/indieWIRE
Back when the IFP celebrated its 20th anniversary, the Independent Feature Film Market (now called Independent Film Week) had reached a sort of zenith after a decade of growing importance. In fact, in the late 90s, films from off Hollywood—just outside the studio system—were frequently being hailed by critics and the Academy alike. Meanwhile, indie filmmakers were banging down the doors to get their work into the annual fall Market (and paying a premium price for the privilege), hoping that the IFP would be their gateway to the expanding, studio-backed specialty film world. After all, that path had worked for Kevin Smith and “Clerks,” who was inspired by Richard Linklater and “Slacker.” Both used the IFFM as a stepping-stone into festivals, and ultimately distribution. The dream of being the next overnight success on the order of Kevin Smith was a myth that still seemed possible in the mid-90s. Make your movie and wait for Harvey Weinstein to discover you at Sundance. Next stop Oscar night. Along the way, in the 90s things seemed to get better and better (new specialty divisions were formed by each Hollywood studio) before they actually got much worse in this decade (many Indiewood companies eventually shut down). Unlike some of their less fortunate cousins (AIVF, Film Arts Foundation), the Independent Feature Project and its annual market survived. But, not without adapting dramatically over the past decade. Facing changing needs of filmmakers and industry alike, organizers effectively killed the market event in favor of developing networking outlets and initiatives to more directly support fewer films each year. And now in its 31st year, the IFP is a different sort of organization with an entirely different annual market event (that kicks off tomorrow in New York City). Back in the ‘90s at the IFFM—in a troubling game of cat and mouse—bearers of the color-coded buyers badges would hide their lanyards while navigating the circus atmosphere on the sidewalk outside the event. As the buyers pushed past the filmmakers—some of whom were wearing costumes or holding signs to attract attention—postcards would be shoved into their hands. The acquisitions execs from the studio specialty divisions—October Films, Miramax, Fine Line Features—hoped to slip into the Angelika Film Center in downtown New York unnoticed for fear of being bombarded by the masses that were trying to lure attendees to one of the many concurrent screenings offering clips from an unseen independent feature film seeking a dream deal. Very few tangible pacts were struck in those days, with much of the action coming from programmers who would pursue projects for their film festivals. The buyers were there just in case. John Pierson, who literally and figuratively wrote the book on ‘80s and ‘90s American indie filmmaking, shepherded Richard Linklater and Kevin Smith out of the IFP and IFFM, but later damned the event as a dumping ground. Ten years ago it was filled with hundreds of finished feature films, many made by filmmakers who maxed out their credit cards or borrowed money from family and friends. Most of those movies never saw the light of day past a twenty minute screening at the Angelika. But some did.
|
AFI Fest
AFI Fest '09
Stella Artois Taste Profile
A sophisticated European pils with a brewing tradition dating back to 1366, Stella Artois has a pleasantly bitter flavor and refreshing finish for superior drinkability that stands out from other European lagers. Stella Artois is brewed using only the finest natural ingredients, including water, barley malt, hops, non-malted grains and a unique yeast strain that has been a much-cherished secret for hundreds of years. http://www.stellaartois.com |
Great history of IFP! Having been there from it’s wild, everyone-gets-in, Fellini-esque carnival days through its transition to a selection process to now being a non-market, I can say that you really summed it all up well. This will become required reading for my filmmaking students!
Eugene, thank you for this excellent article on the IFP 31st birthday. You captured the history so well. Like Ted [Hope] and Peter [Broderick], I’m focused on solving the challenges of our 4th decade. The IFP has survived because it is like an indie filmmaker itself - constantly adapting yet remaining true to its vision. All my best, Sandra [Schulberg, IFP Founding Director]