Piper Chapman (Taylor Schilling), the protagonist of Kohan's new Netflix series "Orange is the New Black," premiering July 11th at 12:01am PT, has also dabbled on the wrong side of the law, though by the time we catch up with her, she's merely paying for it with a 15-month stint in women's prison. The series, based on a memoir by Piper Kerman, is funny, outrageous and surprisingly touching, and features a terrifically diverse ensemble cast that includes Kate Mulgrew, Natasha Lyonne, Michelle Hurst and Laura Prepon as fellow inmates and Jason Biggs as Piper's fiance. Indiewire caught up with Kohan by phone to talk about the series, flawed protagonists and whether performers still have hangups about working on the small screen.
I wanted to start by asking about your thoughts on likability. "Weeds" presented what was for a while the lone female antihero in a world of Tony Sopranos and Walter Whites. Piper isn't a drug dealer, but she's certainly a flawed character as well. Do you feel there are fears about or a reluctance attached to having a female character who doesn't always act nice in a way that we don't seem to have with male protagonists?
I love flawed characters, male or female, and I only want to talk about flawed characters, really, in what I do. I think likability is bullshit -- we are complicated beings, sometimes we're likable and sometimes we're not... and sometimes we fuck up radically. I want to live in that gray area, I never want to sit in the black or the white -- I would get bored and I don't think it reflects reality. Women are flawed, and people are flawed, and why not talk about that?
What I do love about Piper and what I loved about Nancy was that, yeah, they screwed up all the time and they were damaged, but they were trying to do what they thought was the right thing in the moment. No one's willfully fucking up unless they're a sociopath which, you know, we might have a few them present. [laughs] We're all trying, and we're all failing, and then we're trying again, and I think that's compelling and something I really identify with.
Nancy and Piper are both characters from comfortable upbringings who are brought into this world of crime... What's interesting about that idea to you as a storyteller?
Also, you know, Piper's a gateway drug. I don't think I could have sold a show about black and Latina and old women in prison, you know? But if I had the girl next door coming in as my fish out of water, I can draw a certain audience in through her that can identify with her, and then I can tell all of these stories once she's in, once we've signed onto this journey. She's just a great entry point for a lot of people.
And through her the show also becomes this examination of privilege from the perspective of someone who's never thought about coming from privilege all that much.
Sure -- and there are a lot of ways to sound pretentious. [laughs] We are stuck in our cycles of privilege and poverty, but we can't talk about it; there are classes and there are oppressions and there is racism... There are a lot of people trying to deal with it, and I'm trying to deal with it too.
Piper's a professional high-end soapmaker from Brooklyn, and there's a certain degree of schadenfreude in the beginning of the show in watching her deal with rough prison life. How do you balance out those moments, which are really entertaining, with not just punishing this character?
I think to some extent we're all guilty of that; we all play these roles and have a Zelig-like ability to conform to our surroundings. Piper has to adapt, she has to figure shit out, and it'll be hard for her in the beginning but that's part of the journey.
You mentioned the flashbacks, and they're an essential part of the structure of the episodes. Netflix has offered this freedom from the traditional boundaries of TV and the originals have all played with that in different ways so far. How did it affect how you wanted to structure "Orange is the New Black"?
Truthfully, it came out of not wanting to spend 24/7 in the prison, as someone who was spending her days writing this stuff and living this stuff. I found it so oppressive to be trapped in there. I didn't want to live my life that way. This is the creative team's way of getting blue skies, of getting some real life, of getting a breather from those walls and those bars. And, as I said before, a way to add more dimension to all of these characters. They're not just who they are in prison. They have lives outside, and they behave differently in those lives.
Was the idea always to start exploring the other characters and their backstories as well?
How much of that was in the book vs. how much ended up getting built out in the show?
The book was really a launching point. I loved the beginning and the characters that Piper talked about -- the real Piper. But the book was relatively conflict-free, you know: "I went to prison and I was scared but then I met all these really interesting people and I had this experience and then I went home and married my fiance." You start with that but then it becomes its own animal -- we departed from the book pretty quickly. And I think to a certain extent, it's a relief for the real Piper -- you'd have to ask her -- you don't want to see your real life reflected back at you. At a certain point, this character is not her. She becomes her own person and we start telling her story, and all these other stories that aren't necessarily in the book. The show takes on a life of its own.
How much did you keep in mind the possibility of audiences binge-watching when making the show?
This first season, not enough, maybe. I rolled up my sleeves and it was time to make the donuts and this is how I make TV. As we went along, I realized I should go back and tweak things. If we have a season two [Ed. note: which has since been greenlit], I would certainly plot a little differently and plant more seeds and give some more Easter eggs because if people are watching it at once they're not going to forget necessarily what happens or they can go back. For the most part this season, I just kept my head down and did the work and didn't think about the larger context of how it was presented. I'd like to think about that a little more maybe.