Celebrating 17 Years of Film.Biz.Fans.
by Ronan Doyle
October 28, 2013 9:00 AM
10 Comments
  • |

Review: Why Is Tobe Hooper's 'Djinn,' the First UAE-Produced Horror Film, Such A Terrible Movie?

Tobe Hooper's "Djinn."

For the construction of then-Crown Prince of Dubai Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum's horseracing arenas in 2003, sand was flown from the notably sandy nation from the UK, of all places, its purity allegedly far superior to the native counterpart. When you've got the money to spare, you can afford to bring in the best. That's the thinking, in slightly more thoughtful form, behind employing genre legend Tobe Hooper ("The Texas Chainsaw Massacre") to direct "Djinn," the first full-fledged horror feature in the United Arab Emirate's burgeoning film industry, produced under the auspices of Image Nation. Long awaited and long expected, it's been the source of no shortage of controversy for its two year-plus post-production process, in the course of which any number of rumors have emerged as to the cause of its delay, citing everything from extensive special effects work to political interference.

Whatever the real reasons behind "Djinn"'s belated arrival, we can be sure it wasn't held back for quality control: From its very first frame, expounding exposition over a shoddily-shot desert sequence, this is an unmitigated disaster of a movie, every bit as horrible as the events it attempts to portray. They involve the eponymous spirits, demonic beings -- per the Qur’an -- forged of fire who slip surreptitiously into the world of the living and torment at will. Played -- in their better scenes -- with passable personality by Khalid Laith and Razane Jammal, their targets here are Khalid and Salama, UAE expatriates in the US struggling to cope with the recent loss of an infant child who move to a lavish new apartment building outside Abu Dhabi.

Conspicuous by his absence from Friday night's world premiere, it's unclear just how much of the blame for this titanic trainwreck is to be leveled at Hooper's feet. Accounts of set visits to the filming of "integral" scenes now nowhere to be found in the finished product -- coupled with the well-documented difficulties of the journey from set to screen itself -- suggest at least some level of interference, but if there's a single shot in the final film for which Hooper called cut he ought to be ashamed. Tonally as well as technically, this is an atrocious excuse for a movie that would be strikingly bad from a first-timer. Indeed, it's not so much "Djinn" as it is "The Tobe Hooper Massacre": a repudiation of reputation that not only fails to remind us of the heights this director once scaled, but actively invites us to wonder if it's not just our spectacles' curiously rosy hue misinforming our recollection.

But let's not lean too hard on Tobe, much as he may deserve it for not -- at the very least -- insisting outright upon an Alan Smithee. Hitchcock couldn't have helped much with a script as insistently uninventive as David Tully's, which takes the opportunity to act as a jumping-off point for an entire new industry and instead imports beat-for-beat the worst of the worst of the worst of American horror cinema. Every scare here is an insult to that word, either indulging in the aggravating quiet-loud contrast that invokes as valid an emotional response as does an onion to the eye or any amount of absurdly old-hat imagery: shapes leaning in from the wall; creepy-faced kids’ toys; mysteriously-moving rocking chairs. 

"Djinn" represents, in the end, a fundamental failure to capitalize on the chance for a particularly culturally-rooted new breed of horror film. It becomes, instead, a laughing stock that will do well to rouse a single genuine scare in its entire theatrical lifespan.

Perhaps, in a sense, that's the thinking here: the only people who could conceivably be frightened are those who've never before seen a horror film, a sure bet in a country yet to have one. Except it's not: the one thing "Djinn" gets right, in its production as much as its plot as much as the city it sets itself beside, is the immense internationality of the world today. This was never to be the first horror movie, but the first Emirati horror, the first effort in the genre to tap the nation's considerable mythological resources for an interesting new twist on well-worn tropes. 

A popular theory behind the movie's delay, following the paradigm shift in the Arab world, involves the prospect of a project as significant as this being in foreign hands as the source of some shame. The theory's merits we’ll likely never know; the shame, at least, we can certify.

Criticwire Grade: F

HOW WILL IT PLAY? Negative native reactions to Friday night's premiere suggest a grim fate ahead for the UAE release on Halloween. Stateside, Hooper's horror prestige and a novel concept should see some support from genre audiences, though a high ratio of Arabic dialogue and less-than-stellar early word may confine any small success to VOD sales.

You might also like:

10 Comments

  • Al B. Sure | April 7, 2014 12:59 PMReply

    Simply awful. Completely agree with the review. If they had spent more time working on the script and the characters instead of fixating on that car (this could have easily been an automobile commercial) as well as the CGI, they could have made something special. Just a convoluted storyline with uninspiring actors. Advice to the screenwriter for future movies--keep it simple and to the point.

  • jack desmond | November 20, 2013 9:30 PMReply

    Did the backwash who wrote this "review" even see this film? You couldn't tell as there are no real references to the plot or what specifically is so bad about it. Sounds like just another sorry asa loser tobe Hooper hater

  • Erik | November 11, 2013 12:41 PMReply

    I saw the Tobe Hooper version pf picture in London before ImageNation rewrote, reshot, and reedited Djinn. From what I gleaned, someone in the royal family was very upset with ImagenNation that Hooper's version had elements in it that made Emirates look bad, i.e. they didn't like the fact that Emeratis were portrayed as Djinn. Didn't like the fact that the protagonists came back to the UAE and were unhappy being there. The term artistic censorship by the Emirati government over the film was bandied around. ImageNation had to reshoot scenes (without Hooper) to sanitize the movie so that nothing about Emirates or the UAE could be anything short of perfection. The protagonist female (Jammal) was a victim in the original but in the reshoot/recut version she's the bad guy.

  • Unknown | November 3, 2013 5:20 AMReply

    This was from the best movies i saw

  • Fred | October 29, 2013 1:56 AMReply

    What is so bad about it?

  • Ronan Doyle | October 29, 2013 3:11 AM

    Everything! It doesn't understand its host culture, it's dreadfully made, it's never scary nor even close, the dialogue and performances are lacking in the extreme, it hasn't got an original idea to its name (or even a decent rip-off of an original one), and the "special effects" Image Nation are using as an excuse for its delay are especially unconvincing.

  • Robert | October 28, 2013 9:21 PMReply

    But did you like it. Unclear from the article.

  • Fred | October 28, 2013 6:30 PMReply

    Strangely, I have only heard good things about this. Maybe you just don't get horror.

  • Elvis the Djinn | November 4, 2013 7:01 PM

    who told you good things about it ?? the Production crew ??
    its a shame for a country and his resources,,

  • Ronan Doyle | October 28, 2013 6:44 PM

    "Strangely" is a good word for it alright, all I could hear from the crowd—over the sound of people scrambling for the exits, of course—was laughter.