Celebrating 17 Years of Film.Biz.Fans.
by Alison Willmore
October 17, 2012 1:26 PM
0 Comments
  • |

Founder Terence Gray Explains How The New York Television Festival Works

NYTVF
While film festivals are a well-established way for independent films to get noticed by audiences and members of the industry, the idea of a similar structure for indie TV projects to be shown to networks is a relatively new one. The New York Television Festival, which was launched in 2005 and kicks off its 2012 iteration on October 22nd, has worked to provide a path for indie artists to get both exposure and development deals at networks, showcasing talent and program ideas and offering a way for channels to request the type of projects that suit their needs via individual pilot competitions.

READ MORE: The New York Television Festival's Independent Pilot Competition Picks Include Bill Plympton, Michael Showalter, Lorenzo Lamas

Indiewire caught up with NYTVF founder and executive director Terence Gray to talk about how the festival works, why networks have partnered to set up year-round competitions with it, and how IFC's game show parody "Bunk" (which has, unfortunately, since been canceled) and SPEED's "Hard Parts: South Bronx" became the first pilots from the festival to be greenlit to series.

So tell me a bit about the festival and how it began. It's obviously grown a lot and now involves the participation of quite a few networks -- what were your aims when you started the festival?

The original aim was to set up a development platform in the way that many film festivals have been avenues for directors and filmmakers. We wanted a system for television in the same vein. When the festival first started, it really took the model of a film festival where we started an independent pilot competition -- our main competition in the festival. We accepted independent pilots, meaning independently financed, of any genre of TV.

That worked really well -- we got a couple hundred pilots at the outset. We put the top pilots in the festival and had some success. In the early years, pilots got deals with NBC, with A&E -- so it was very exciting that we had approved a concept. Around 2008, one of our leading board members, Kevin Reilly, who is the president of entertainment at Fox... we constructed a new development initiative for comedy scripts that were specifically for Fox. As part of that deal, Fox guaranteed a blind network script deal, which I don’t think had ever been done before, certainly in a festival setting.

That was really a game changer for us because it separated the TV development festival from the film festival. Ater the first deal with Fox, we added IFC and MTV giving us creative briefs in our pilot competition, saying "We are going to guarantee a deal at the network and here’s what we’re looking for." In 2010, we had about four guaranteed deals.

By 2011, we had 15 guaranteed deals, bringing on a tremendous amount of network partners. And in 2012, we’ve announced 26 guaranteed development deals with 18 different partners. We’ve found that if we’re more specific with our production community, it’s better for them and better for our industry partners in terms of getting the types of pilots that they’re looking for. It’s been very helpful on both ends.

So the pilot pitching process has seemed something of a closed world to industry newcomers and outside voices before. How did you go about convincing networks to open up in this way, to consider so many creators who came from off their usual radar?

I think it was a confluence of a lot of different things -- but certainly at the head of that is the willingness of the TV industry to welcome in and view new talent that is coming through our pipeline. The development process has changed so much -- first, with the advent of reality television and how that started to dominate cable, certainly on the broadcast level as well. And over the years the process of pitching from script to show has really evolved. You have to have tape -- producers have an expectation, whether it’s casting or sizzle, that when they are going into the pitch room they are bringing tape with them.

Secondarily, the technology that has emerged with bringing down the cost of production has been incredible for a generation of producers. If you tie that ability to use digital cameras, edit online, all of that with what’s happened with YouTube and the ability to self-distribute, you have all of these producers making episodic content for the first time. The festival was lucky where it launched that all of these things were taking place so that identifying talent became a different game, so that it became a little bit easier.

For the first time, you could bring a scripted comedy or drama in front of a development executive -- where 15 or 20 years ago, those things were not being made on spec because of the financing around them. Everyone assumed you were going to be in a studio, it’s going to be a three-camera shoot. They were very expensive.

This new technology coupled with the idea that if you put in the hard work and money and all that, that even if you didn’t get it, you could self-distribute on YouTube. Those are very powerful engines that I think has changed the dynamic of the development process and certainly has been a great thing for the festival and allowed us to elevate tremendous artists.

“Bunk” on IFC was the first show to come through the festival to get greenlit to series?

'Bunk' IFC
The first comedy, yes. It was very exciting for us. IFC has been a terrific partner for many years, since the beginning of the festival. We’ve loved the creators. They’ve been involved with the festival a long time -- so that was great.

There was another show that also premiered out of last year, called “Hard Parts: South Bronx." That was a show that wasn’t picked up through one of the network deals at the festival, but a production company came in -- several companies are around the festival and looking at the material throughout the week -- and packaged it together and brought it to the SPEED Network, which is a division of Fox Sports.

You might also like:

0 Comments