Exactly. There was a group of writers with Mitch, and they had spent a lot of time on the scripts -- not that these guys didn’t. It was just a different way of working. On "Arrested," the situations were so extreme and Mitch had spent so much time on callbacks, you trusted that this really had been specifically crafted to his vision. We would try to improv a bit, but it didn’t fit into the matrix.
Whereas with Armando, because of the way "Veep" was shot and the fact that it takes place in D.C., which is obviously a real environment, we really had to find the truth in those situations, and the organic relationships.
Fans have never given up hope for more "Arrested Development," and Netflix recently their plans to release 10 new episodes simultaneously next year. How far along are you in that process?
I don’t really want to to know. A big part of that show, which I treasure, is the element of surprise. I love coming to a reading and being like, “Holy crap, my hand is coming off!” So I actually don’t want to know anything until we start getting together and doing readings. All I know is that it’s happening in the summer, and we’re all opening ourselves up for it. I haven’t gotten any details -- that’s the fun mystery of it.
There’s not a huge overlap between Gary and Buster, but there’s a common quality they share.
The underlying joke of the show is that she doesn’t really need protection, since no one would bother harming her. The best Gary can do is throw himself between her and a sick person’s sneeze.
But in my world, she needs about a thousand motorcades around her. She is so precious to me. If I had my way, I would hire the entire Secret Service to be around her 24/7.
He assumes everyone else reveres her as he does.
Oh, sure. Why would they not? She’s pretty much a god. The thought of anybody criticizing her, I’m not only blown away but devastated. That doesn’t even enter my world.
What effect did the behind-the-scenes research you did for "Veep" have on your feelings about the political system as a whole?
What’s fascinating about D.C., the exteriors are these elaborate structures, this gorgeous architecture and beautiful stonework, and then you go inside and it’s crap-looking -- apart from the White House, which is beautiful. The Eisenhower Building -- the furniture is mismatched, everything is just bad decor and bad quality. Everybody’s looking down at their Blackberry. It’s a really frantic, mismatched environment. But on the exterior, it’s this whitewashed, gorgeous building. It’s a fascinating contrast.
I’m always fascinated that people think that these people have not made mistakes. They’re a container for so much pressure, so much criticism -- you cannot put that on somebody. People are going to make mistakes. Even in the press, “They have everything! They’re huge celebrities! Why would they do this?” Because they realize, “That’s a lot of pressure. I can’t match that.”
At the moment, members of the Secret Service, who are the most important bodyguards in the world, are in trouble because one of them short-changed a Columbian prostitute.
And let’s acknowledge, those are not good choices. But as a public, why are we so surprised? I’m not saying it’s our fault that it was done. But it’s our fault for the expectations we place on them. The higher up they are, the farther they’re going to fall.