Celebrating 17 Years of Film.Biz.Fans.
by Eric Kohn
November 8, 2011 11:48 AM
9 Comments
  • |

Yes, Plans Exist to Finish the River Phoenix Vehicle "Dark Blood." Just Don't Expect to See It Soon.

A raw-footage screengrab of River Phoenix in "Dark Blood." YouTube

Casting news circulates the internet like clockwork each week, but one story last month stood out from the rest because it involved a dead man: A brief item in The Hollywood Reporter set off a media frenzy with the report that director George Sluizer plans on completing his unfinished 1993 feature "Dark Blood," which came to an abrupt halt following the tragic passing of leading man River Phoenix from a drug overdose that year. 


According to the Hollywood Reporter, Sluizer has teamed with the Dutch production company Eyeworks to re-edit the film, which starred Phoenix as a young man living in the middle of a nuclear testing site who forms a relationship with a marooned couple played by Jonathan Price and Judy Davis. To compensate for the missing star, the story alleged that Sluizer planned on asking the actor's brother, Joaquin Phoenix, to provide voiceover material. The story also asserted that Sluizer felt confident he could release the film in 2012. 


But it's not that simple. 


Reached on his cell phone in Abu Dhabi last week, where he was participating in a film festival jury, Sluizer denied having spoken with anyone from the Hollywood Reporter for the piece (although he was quoted in it) but confirmed that he wanted to finish "Dark Blood," if not anytime in the near future. "Nothing has been done yet," Sluizer told indieWIRE. "A release in 2012 would be really fast. Very simply, when you work and care about something very much, you want to try to finalize it." 


After the production of "Dark Blood" collapsed in the immediate aftermath of Phoenix's death, the rights to the materials were ceded to the insurance company. Sluizer said that he heard the company wanted to destroy the remaining materials around a decade ago, but explained that he "took care that it was not destroyed," but declined to go into details. He also said that the company had tried to sell the materials to archives at UCLA, although a rep for the university could find no record of such an exchange. While it's possible that Sluizer could license the footage (some of which has popped up on YouTube) from the insurance company, he said that he has been relying on Eyeworks to sort out the challenges surrounding the rights. 


Anne Visschedjik, an Eyeworks representative involved in that process, told indieWIRE via e-mail that it was too early for the company to discuss the project. "We share George's passion for the project and we are researching the possibilities," she said. 


Sluizer also offered only scant details about how he might finish the film, noting that he had only mentioned the possibility of a Joaquin Phoenix voiceover to a colleague in passing. However, he explained his motive for wanting to complete the film at great length, pointing to his own near-death experience--a close call with an aneurysm--three years ago that led him to consider his unfinished work. "I didn't die, but I started to think, 'Can I finish this before it's too late?'" he said. "That's basically the way it started." 


He added that Ted Turner had offered to use the footage for a documentary about Phoenix after his death, but the director turned him down.  "I was the only one interested in the movie," he said, but the sudden end to the production seven days before the scheduled completion of the shoot left him in an emotionally uneasy state. 


Before the film began, Sluizer said he spent time alone with Phoenix in the mountains of Utah a week prior to the production, helping the actor prepare for the role. "I wouldn't say I was a father figure to River, but on that film we had a relationship that was very strong," he said. He received a call from Phoenix's agent on the night of the actor's death on October 31, 1993. "I thought I was having a nightmare," he recalled.  He left the country shortly afterward. "I was not sure I wanted to make any more films," he said, noting that pre-production on "Dark Blood" lasted three years.


If Sluizer does work out a deal with the insurance company to complete the production, he may need a different strategy. Soon after news of the new project came out, Phoenix's estate offered a swift reaction. "Despite George Sluizer's claim that he has been communicating with River Phoenix's family in regard to releasing River's last film, Joaquin Phoenix and his family have not been in communication with the director nor will they participate in any way," read a statement from the family's rep. 


Sluizer, however, said that he had spoken to the family in the past, just not about the possibility of finishing the project. He seemed unfazed about their stance. "I need to find the time and then think about how to fill in the gaps," he said.


He may have a lot of work to do, but that alone won't stop his efforts. Colleagues describe Sluizer as an intensely driven man, pointing to his insistence on directing the English-language remake of his acclaimed 1988 thriller "The Vanishing" just before working on "Dark Blood." "George is an artist with a persistent vision and he doesn't give up easily," said Ruth Vitale, who was an executive at Fine Line when the now-defunct company was producing the movie. "When he digs his teeth into something creatively, really believes in it, he doesn't want to give up." 

"Its like a painting with one corner that's not painted," Sluizer said. "I think it's quite normal for any artist to wish the work can survive in some way."


But she and others think he should at least consider that option. "I understand why he would want to do it," she said, "but I can't imagine why anyone else would want to revisit it." Emerging Pictures managing partner Ira Deutchman, the head of production at Fine Line at that time, condemned Sluizer's attempts in a blog post over the weekend. "Any attempt to finish 'Dark Blood' would be a travesty," Deutchman wrote. "It would be trading on River's fame in the most sordid kind of way. Is this what Sluizer needs to revive his directing career?" 


But Sluizer pled his case to indieWIRE. "Its like a painting with one corner that's not painted," he said. "I think it's quite normal for any artist to wish the work can survive in some way." 


So far, none of the original producers have signed on to this tentative effort, although one of them, Nik Powell, said he had been contacted by Eyeworks. "Our point of view is that it was tragic but we don't really see how anyone could complete it," the UK-based producer explained. "River, god bless him, was in pretty much every scene. Honestly, a performance is a whole experience, and if you only have half of it, it doesn't really do it justice." 


Nevertheless, Powell didn't completely rule out his willingness to get involved in a new release. "I can't even think about it yet because I don't know how one can make a film out of it," he said, "I'm not really interested in being part of it, but I wouldn't say that as an absolute thing." Still, Powell said that those seeking to study Phoenix's legacy should look elsewhere. "We know he's fantastic in those scenes," he said. "But the public and the fans should watch the wonderful films he's made that are complete." 


Sluizer himself said that he didn't want to finish "Dark Blood" primarily as a ode to the actor. "If something happens, it will be a tribute to River," he said, "but there are three main actors are they're all very good." He emphasized the personal nature of the material. "Let's put it this way," he said. "My intention is to try and finish the film. The main goal is that the work is finalized. Other people can care about the distribution and the money, but that's my reason." 

You might also like:

9 Comments

  • bugaloo | December 14, 2011 2:23 AMReply

    It's a little disturbing that Sluizer claims to have spoken about this to several parties who say they've heard nothing of the sort, while he now denies he spoke to The Hollywood Reporter--a reputable publication that would hardly be likely to invent quotes for a story. Also, he claims production shut down seven days early, but other reports have said even more days were lost, and certainly the lack of enthusiasm from other participants suggests much more than "one corner of the painting" remained un-shot, making any kind of final assembly a dubious proposition. Of course it wound be interesting to see any result, but viewed in the context of Sluizer's very weird, erratic filmography--impressively mounted art films ("Stone Raft"), threadbare ones ("Red Desert Penitentiary"), weak genre films, the excellent original "Vanishing," the lamentable remake, etc. shot all over the world, in different languages, with practically no tangible connecting thread--it seems just as likely "Dark Blood" would have been a misfire as a good film even under ideal circumstances. I mean, what can you say about somebody who within a few years would do both an ambitious Jose Saramago adaptation and a cheesy Stephen Baldwin B-thriller?

  • Jonquil | November 9, 2011 7:02 PMReply

    I apologize for that comment posting four times!

  • Jonquil | November 9, 2011 6:56 PMReply

    This is exactly what I thought his perspective was, when I'd heard this. I really felt it was about him simply finishing this film -- maybe even for slightly, superstitious reasons -- that he needed it to be completed so that his mind could be put to rest, over it.

    Creating these films occupy entire periods out of people's lives. To not complete a piece of work that you fixated on, for months and years out of your life, could leave a lot of uneasy feelings hanging and a lingering sense of irresponsibility. There are some things we can't change, in life, and some things we do have power over. To have the power to finish this, decades later, against all odds, must be something really worth considering for him.

    I didn't think he was ever pretending to be in the middle of this project with Joaquin, only that he was rolling around the idea of asking him. Phoenix's family's response made sense from their perspective, too. I'm sure Sluizer recognizes how important it is, that if he does choose to finish this film, he does it well...and very carefully. With high levels of discretion.

    Good luck to him, on it. It will be a difficult task, nomatter what, and for various reasons. But the effort might produce something very special and important.

  • Jonquil | November 9, 2011 6:54 PMReply

    This is exactly what I thought his perspective was, when I'd heard this. I really felt it was about him simply finishing this film -- maybe even for slightly, superstitious reasons -- that he needed it to be completed so that his mind could be put to rest, over it.

    Creating these films occupy entire periods out of people's lives. To not complete a piece of work that you fixated on, for months and years out of your life, could leave a lot of uneasy feelings hanging and a lingering sense of irresponsibility. There are some things we can't change, in life, and some things we do have power over. To have the power to finish this, decades later, against all odds, must be something really worth considering for him.

    I didn't think he was ever pretending to be in the middle of this project with Joaquin, only that he was rolling around the idea of asking him. Phoenix's family's response made sense from their perspective, too. I'm sure Sluizer recognizes how important it is, that if he does choose to finish this film, he does it well...and very carefully. With high levels of discretion.

    Good luck to him, on it. It will be a difficult task, nomatter what, and for various reasons. But the effort might produce something very special and important.

  • Jonquil | November 9, 2011 6:52 PMReply

    This is exactly what I thought his perspective was, when I'd heard this. I really felt it was about him simply finishing this film -- maybe even for slightly, superstitious reasons -- that he needed it to be completed so that his mind could be put to rest, over it.

    Creating these films occupy entire periods out of people's lives. To not complete a piece of work that you fixated on, for months and years out of your life, could leave a lot of uneasy feelings hanging and a lingering sense of irresponsibility. There are some things we can't change, in life, and some things we do have power over. To have the power to finish this, decades later, against all odds, must be something really worth considering for him.

    I didn't think he was ever pretending to be in the middle of this project with Joaquin, only that he was rolling around the idea of asking him. Phoenix's family's response made sense from their perspective, too. I'm sure Sluizer recognizes how important it is, that if he does choose to finish this film, he does it well...and very carefully. With high levels of discretion.

    Good luck to him, on it. It will be a difficult task, nomatter what, and for various reasons. But the effort might produce something very special and important.

  • Jonquil | November 9, 2011 6:51 PMReply

    This is exactly what I thought his perspective was, when I'd heard this. I really felt it was about him simply finishing this film -- maybe even for slightly, superstitious reasons -- that he needed it to be completed so that his mind could be put to rest, over it.

    Creating these films occupy entire periods out of people's lives. To not complete a piece of work that you fixated on, for months and years out of your life, could leave a lot of uneasy feelings hanging and a lingering sense of irresponsibility. There are some things we can't change, in life, and some things we do have power over. To have the power to finish this, decades later, against all odds, must be something really worth considering for him.

    I didn't think he was ever pretending to be in the middle of this project with Joaquin, only that he was rolling around the idea of asking him. Phoenix's family's response made sense from their perspective, too. I'm sure Sluizer recognizes how important it is, that if he does choose to finish this film, he does it well...and very carefully. With high levels of discretion.

    Good luck to him, on it. It will be a difficult task, nomatter what, and for various reasons. But the effort might produce something very special and important.

  • Barry | November 8, 2011 4:32 PMReply

    I think that any artist would be empathetic to the thought that an unfinished work would be hard to leave behind. If that artist, after living with the subject for so long, could think of a fitting way to finnish the creation, what would be wrong with that? Is time the issue?- I don't see why . . . No one seemed to look down on Terry for Imaginarium . . .

  • AIDY | November 8, 2011 3:42 PMReply

    I really think it is creepy that this film is being finished especially since River's death was so long ago. I truly hope that the film is presented and marketed tastefully. Curious to know what attention the film will have if its released mainstream.

  • Domiziano Arcangeli | November 9, 2011 4:27 AM

    WOW I was stunned by these news myself, also because, having been a huge Fan of River,while growing up,I always wondered about "Dark Blood", and, always, ultimately and sadly thought that, if it had not been completed then, somehow, it was basically for the reason producer Nik Powell was stating, above: "River was going to be virtually involved in basically any scene of that picture, and so,even though, having 5 or 6 weeks of great footage available, how could someone finish the film, without the remaining 3?".
    But,by reading all this, I came to a different conclusion: Why not,if it was possible, and like Aidy is saying,having the Film presented and marketed tastefully,adding what Sluizer said:"This would be more like a Tribute to Phoenix's legacy and not an attempt to exploitation!".
    Then, i think this could be certainly of great interest(even though, I must agree, so many years have passed on, now,that, it does feel a bit creepy, and, also makes you wondering, if the footage shot then, could still make the same sense, almost 20 years later?)probably, and I'd love personally to see where the possibilities of today's most advance techniques, could take this mostly forgotten project to, without wanting to forget also, that I had always heard from reliable sources, that this work was supposed to be the one that would have finally established River,as a major actor and long lasting star!
    I do not agree with Mr. Deutchman's brutal attack to Sluizer, either! If there's a fair possibility why not trying to pursue it?Then, this would not make look director Sluizer like some climber trying to 'revive' his career! It is true that a real artist has the right of expression, and, with all my well known and deepest admiration and respect for River Phoenix, this was not only River's movie,but like any other film,it belongs also to its co-stars,and writers,producers,and crew, and most of all, to its director,no? Especially,in this case,which is involving a movie, that appeared to be a personal and auteur film,and not some Studio's pop corn light romantic comedy,sought after a teen idol!
    I agree also with writer Barry who says that nobody looked down at Gilliam,for completing Heath Ledger's final Film "Dr.Parnassus"and using 3 different Stars replacing Ledger, to take to an end that Film. For this matter, I'd suggest also to consider then Douglas Trumball's "Brainstorm" that,after the sudden and also tragic death of its main Star,Natalie Wood,in 1981, was then completed by MGM in 1983,by changing some of the story, and using a few body doubles,and tricky editing,to release at the end,a decent result and a final Tribute to Natalie Wood's still wonderful acting and persona.
    And,let's think what Fox and others have done with the only 13 days of production left,from the sets of "Something's got to Give"(1962) the George Cukor's sophisticated comedy,which had supposed to become Marilyn Monroe's new image and relaunching vehicle for her career,put in production to save Fox from the huge flop of Taylor's "Cleopatra", but also wisely considering the new "Look", that, a huge Star,like Monroe,had to acquire, consisting of -mainly- re-inventing a whole new Role, suited for a new,innovative decade, like the 1960's,and also,the different age range of the Leading Lady, Monroe, whom-from what we can still see today, thanks to those few scenes re-edited-looked still stunning and at her best, but also,had managed to be capable of "Achieving" such transition, and so,very much suitable for a whole different Class of Roles.
    While,especially in this case,I must agree, someone could use the term of speculation of image,and public use of an uncompleted performance, nobody ever,and especially, her long lasting league of Fans, have complained to be able to watch what was indeed a pleasure for the eyes: Monroe's glowing appearance, and new style,while looking the best she'd ever had,in a few fun scenes 'revived' from that very little footage ever shot, and,finally able to put the word "WRONG" to, the sometime truly aggravating speculations, made over the years ,by some nasty medias,which for years,made us,or wanted us to believe, that Monroe had been fired from the Studio,because looking dreadful and 'madding' in front of the huge Cinemascope's Cameras, and not, instead, acknowledging the battle of the Star, not showing up on set, just as a form of personal strike,requesting Respect,that is, from a Studio, whom she was indeed willing to save from bankruptcy, at the conditions to have a better script to work with,though! Efforts, that allegedly, Fox had at the time denied,rushing instead production on something that,according to Marilyn and her reps,needed much more work!
    Now,sorry,for becoming so lengthy! I just meant to bring my deepest condolences to River's family, but also express,that a right Tribute to River's greatest acting job, would be much appreciated by many,i'm sure,if properly put together and marketed,of course!
    And,at the same time,wanted to bring my best wishes to George Sluizer, who like all artists,if of Art we are talking,would have any right to complete the 'missing corner of his own painting"!