Back to IndieWire

Judd Apatow Says HBO Worried That ‘Girls’ Sex Scenes Could Cost Their License; 6 Seasons Planned

Judd Apatow Says HBO Worried That 'Girls' Sex Scenes Could Cost Their License; 6 Seasons Planned

As the third season gets ready to close out for “Girls,” Lena Dunham‘s show has already made the kind of waves you might expect from a program that has been on the air twice as long. Right out of the gate, Dunham presented the world with a series that, among many other things, was unapologetic about sex, kinks and the human body no matter what shape it comes in (and we’re not just talking Dunham’s; Alex Karpovsky‘s bare ass as he grinded on Allison Williams is still seared in our memory). And while it seems there’s no boundary that can’t be crossed on cable, that’s not necessarily true.

Producer Judd Apatow recently visited Loyola Marymount University (via THR) to chat with students, and during the conversation he revealed that HBO had them pull back on some more risque scenes out of genuine concern they would get yanked off the air. “There have been things on ‘Girls’ where HBO has said to us, ‘If we put this on TV, we literally could lose our license to broadcast,’ ” Apatow said, adding, “Let’s just say it’s something you see in adult film. Elements of sexual intercourse. The high points of sexual intercourse.”

Considering that the show already featured Adam (Adam Driver) ejaculating on the breasts of a former girlfriend, perhaps we can imagine what the XXX version of that scene might be like. But, there will be more opportunity to make HBO suits sweat, as Apatow reveals that Dunham and the gang will be around for a while yet. 

“We’ve talked about doing six seasons. I guess that could change, it’s not set. I think we’re all committed that we’ll do six,” he said about the future of “Girls.” And there has been even been some about what a finale might look like, but nothing is set in stone. “…we’ve talked about it. It makes you respect the ending of ‘The Sopranos‘ though. When you’re part of a show and you think about, how do you end a series, the idea that you just stop and leave people there is so genius, it’s such a great idea,” Apatow explained. “It’s such a great way of saying, it doesn’t matter. This is their life and now we’re just going to leave them to it.”

Of course, no conversation with Apatow is ever complete without the inevitable “Freaks & Geeks” question, and one came up here too—just don’t hold your breath for the gang to come back together. “I think it’s too late. ‘Freaks and Geeks’ would probably have a really sad reunion show,” he stated. “It would have to happen at a prison or at a hospital. We didn’t think much of those people would do very well. We thought Lindsay might escape but for the most part, it probably wouldn’t be a pretty picture. So we’ve never taken that seriously. Whenever you see those reunion shows, there’s something that feels wrong about that.”

In a way though, you might’ve already seen a “Freaks & Geeks” followup and just didn’t know it. ” ‘Superbad‘ feels like an extension of ‘Freaks and Geeks,’ and ‘Forgetting Sarah Marshall’ feels like an extension,” Apatow said. “In a way we continue to tell those types of stories, so I don’t feel like it’s open ended. And I like the ending. That Lindsay goes off to follow the Dead. We did talk about what would happen second season. Paul [Feig] had a lot of ideas about Lindsay having very serious drug problems. She loved acid. She loved it.”

Well, with Jessa becoming a junkie in “Girls,” perhaps the circle is complete. Thoughts on sex scenes in “Girls?” You know where to go.

Sign Up: Stay on top of the latest breaking film and TV news! Sign up for our Email Newsletters here.

This Article is related to: Television and tagged , , , , ,

Get The Latest IndieWire Alerts And Newsletters Delivered Directly To Your Inbox