You will be redirected back to your article in seconds
Back to IndieWire

Why David Suchet Came So Close To Missing Out On Poirot

Why David Suchet Came So Close To Missing Out On Poirot

By Darwyn Carson – If not for a twist of fate and a bit of luck we might never
have been witness to David Suchet as the titular character in the long running
television series Agatha Christie’s
. It’s true. Skilled actor (and my newest hero) Suchet, was in Los
Angeles recently performing in the award winning play, The Last Confession, at the Ahmanson.

While Suchet was here, and in anticipation of the premiere of
Poirot’s thirteenth and final season,
Acorn TV took the opportunity to host a showing of Curtain: Poirot’s Last Case at The Paley Center for Media in
Beverly Hills.  The Q&A afterward, with
Suchet, led by Los Angeles Times Television Editor Robert Lloyd, revealed a man
as thoughtful and kind as he is gifted. There’s a lot going on behind those
intelligent brown eyes that, when the man is in character, crinkle so adeptly
into a gleeful twinkle, and then just as quickly dissolve into a look as sharp
as a well-honed knife.

Suchet shared where he was in his life and career at the
moment he was offered the role of the meticulously bespoke Belgian detective
with the mincing walk. When addressing the audience in his deep baritone, with
no hint of the nasalness with which we are familiar, he tells why a little bit
of bad turned out to be, in the end, his good fortune:

“It was 1987. So I
had done three big television series. I’d played Sigmund Freud, [I’d done] the
Tom Sharpe novels, Blott on the Landscape,
[and] I’d done a big series Oppenheimer
for the BBC.

In terms of my
film career it was pretty non-existent. And my theatre… I was really a classical
theatre actor. Because I joined the Royal Shakespeare Theatre Company in 1973
and I left it in 1986, so that’s a long time in the classical stable. And I
left it in 1986 having played Iago with Ben Kingsley as Othello.”

It was in 1985, right before Suchet was about to do Iago that
he was hired for a role in a television movie. And this is where fate took a

“I’m here to tell you that … in
1985… I had been in a Poirot film, playing Inspector Japp… I wasn’t very happy
playing Inspector Japp. I knew that I was about to go to Stratford to rehearse
Iago in Othello and when the film came out, it was quite clear that it was one
of the worse performances that I have ever given. But I was so grateful for
that. Now let me tell you why.

How can an actor be grateful that
he’d been so bad? Well first of all, I didn’t know how to play Inspector Japp. I
had no idea…I’d read the story “Thirteen at Dinner” and I still had no idea.
It wasn’t my role, really. But Peter Ustinov went on to make four other television
films with the same supporting cast. If I had been good, I would have played
Japp for the next four films, and I’d never had played Poirot, because they
wouldn’t have let me.”

Here he looked to the sky, pressed his hands together and
said “Thank you.”

We viewers concur; for without that
twist of fate we would have not born witness to an already iconic literary figure
being brought to life, by Suchet, with such creative precision and unwavering

The fact that he loved playing the character,
and in fact, called him “my best friend,” is evident and makes watching the
Poirot library of titles over and over again that much more pleasurable. Through
the creation, Suchet has become as iconic as the detective he interpreted for
the screen, although he explains that to become rich or famous or to have any
of the trappings that go with fame was never his intention as those things, he stated,
don’t last.

“I found that I had a purpose in life as an actor, when I
realized that writer’s write… they write either to be read as a novelist or
they write to be performed as dramatist… …My job is to serve my writer. If I am
to serve them and if Poirot is going to be dramatized, then I have to go back
to source and try to be as true to them, my writers, as I possibly can be…

So it gives me an important function in my life to become the
voice of my (writer) so an adaptation of an Agatha Christie story, my writer
then will be an adaptor, my creator will be Agatha Christie. So I will study
and study and study and study and study the Poirot from Agatha Christie’s point
of view to bring him as close as possible, so that if Agatha was alive she
would say “Yes… or No.”

We think she would say “yes.” To be sure, Suchet’s dedication
has turned out to be our win.

Poirot has been on air for over 25 years now and is seen in
over 100 countries. And while he continues to hit the boards, the thirteenth
and final season of Poirot, which aired
last fall in Britain, will launch in the states on Sunday July 27 on PBS. The first
two episodes debuting on Masterpiece Mystery (the 27th and Aug. 3rd)
will be available for streaming beginning the day after on Acorn TV.  Then a first: the last three Poirot films starting with Elephants Can Remember on Aug.
11, will show solely on Acorn TV.

(Also see: David Suchet speaks about life as Poirot)

These final five episodes make for a total of 70 titles in
the Poirot canon and with the airing of the final episode, The Curtain on August 25, the complete library will be available for
streaming only on the Acorn channel.

a peek at what will be in store as the end of an era draws near:

Sign Up: Stay on top of the latest breaking film and TV news! Sign up for our Email Newsletters here.

This Article is related to: Television and tagged , , , , , ,