Back to IndieWire

The Suha Arraf Affair

The Suha Arraf Affair

Katriel Schory, executive director of the Israel Film Fund sent this:

“Dear Friend,

One of the three major newspapers in Israel, “Haaretz” newspaper, decided to dedicate its weekend edition’s editorial, to the Palestinian-Israeli filmmaker
Suha Arraf
and her film “Villa Touma” which the Film Fund supported and the Minister of Culture seems to be extremely unhappy.”

Stop political persecution in Israel’s film industry

The culture ministry’s ‘Zionist’ war on Arab-Israeli filmmaker Suha Arraf and other such campaigns will have dire consequences for Israeli cinema and

Haaretz Editorial
| Aug. 8, 2014 | 3:42 AM

Filmmaker Suha Arraf received funding from Israeli institutions, primarily the Israel Film Fund, for the production of “Villa Touma.” She chose, however,
to submit it to the Venice Film Festival as a Palestinian film. The move ignited a campaign of persecution against Arraf, and subsequently against the
executive director of the Israel Film Fund, Katriel Schory, who refused to join the assault on Arraf.

Now Culture and Sports Minister Limor Livnat wants the funding provided by the foundation returned. This, despite Arraf’s willingness, with Schory’s
encouragement, to remove “Palestine” from the film’s country of origin. “The opinion of the Culture Ministry’s legal counsel underscores the concern that
the film’s maker of the film behaved cynically when she sought recognition and support for her film as an Israeli film,” Livnat said. “Film funds that
serve as a conduit for financial support have a duty to ascertain that they are used for this purpose. It would appear that in the case of ‘Villa Touma,’
the film fund did not perform its duty.”

In response, Schory said that he too had expected Arraf to present her film as Israeli, but he stressed that there is no contractual obligation regarding
the way a film is submitted to festivals. So far, he added, Arraf has met all her obligations, including detailed credit to the Israeli film funds that
took part in financing her production.

Arraf’s decision does not justify the persecution campaign against her and against the film fund and Schory. The government of Israel should learn to
accommodate all the complexities in the identity of its Palestinian citizens, and in any event to prevent political interference in the state’s cultural
institutions — a practice that Livnat has actually upheld. The culture minister, who apparently envies her rivals on the right who are vying with each
other in hate speech against Arabs, has launched all-out “Zionist” war on the filmmaker, and in so doing is crushing the Israel Film Fund underfoot.

Thanks to the film funds, the Israeli film industry presents the beautiful face of Israel to the world. Political interference will bring down the curtain
on it and on Israeli culture in general.

Related Articles

Minister demands subsidy back after director classifies film as Palestinian

By Nirit Anderman | Aug. 8, 2014 | 1:02 PM

Israeli artists opposing the war come under attack on social networks

By Dafna Arad | Jul. 22, 2014 | 4:10 AM

Punch a lefty, save the homeland: Israel rediscovers political violence

By Asher Schechter | Jul. 24, 2014 | 7:58 AM

Sign Up: Stay on top of the latest breaking film and TV news! Sign up for our Email Newsletters here.

This Article is related to: News and tagged , , , , , , ,

Get The Latest IndieWire Alerts And Newsletters Delivered Directly To Your Inbox