Considering Sergio’s box office post a week ago, in which he discussed the “super genius scientist” roles played by Chiwetel Ejiofor and Donald Glover in “The Martian,” and wondered when we’ll start to see even more movies about black people in science, or black scientists, or great scientific minds who happen to be of African descent – the likes of Neil deGrasse Tyson (maybe the most popular, or at least celebrity scientist today)… I was reminded of this book-to-film review I published on this blog years ago, on African American scientist, Dr Ronald Mallett’s time travel memoir, “Time Traveler: A Scientist’s Personal Mission To Make Time Travel A Reality.” Spike Lee has long been attached to direct a film adaptation based on the book, but there’s been no reported movement on it, in years. So it’s a mystery whether it’s something that he still has on his agenda, or if the project is dead.
But I repost my thoughts (I read the book), imagining how Spike could adapt Mallett’s story to film, in the hopes that it’ll lead to an update on the project – especially at a time when it seems (emphasis on “seems”) that there may be a burgeoning interest in what we could generally deem “black science/science fiction” – 2 documentaries we know of are in the works on the contributions of black scientists, authors, filmmakers to science fact and science fiction (M. Asli Dukan’s is maybe the most notable); there’s the recent reboot of a landmark science TV series (“Cosmos”) hosted by a renowned African American scientist, who’s immensely popular and mainstream (Neil deGrasse Tyson); there certainly has been plenty of critical and not-so critical discussion on this blog (and elsewhere) on the subject, especially as it relates to cinema; there seem to be more and more film screening series and film festivals emerging, with focus on science fiction films made by and are about black people; we have a president of African descent who certainly hasn’t been shy about his beliefs on the importance of science; one of the more recognizable actresses of African descent, Halle Berry, starred 2 seasons of a sci-fi TV series produced by a filmmaker who’s directed and/or produced several films in the sci-fi genre (Steven Spielberg); and more.
There are other examples I could list (my Twitter and Facebook feeds all seem to be hailing a sort of rise or, at least, acknowledgement of the “black geek” and the variety that falls under that broad umbrella, for example), but I’d just say that there’s just what feels like an overall emphasis and enthusiasm on black scifi that’s maybe more mainstream than it’s ever been; feel free to correct me if I’m wrong on that.
It did get me wondering whether some of those sci-fi projects that black filmmakers have been wanting to see produced for years now, might have a better chance in 2015 and immediately beyond, to become realities. Hollywood certainly loves the genre – including Spike Lee’s adaptation of Dr Ronald Mallett’s “Time Traveler: A Scientist’s Personal Mission To Make Time Travel A Reality.
Ian Harnarine, a celebrated director in his own right, and whose work we’ve featured on S&A in recent years, penned the adaptation.
By the way, Harnarine has graduate degrees in both Nuclear Physics and Film. Quite the combo; but it’s no wonder why Spike chose him to adapt the book, given that his feet are firmly planted in both worlds.
I purchased the book not long after the announcement of Spike’s interest, and eventually read it some time after.
It was much thinner than I expected, as I flipped through to the very last page to see that it’s just over 200 pages in length.
I read it in 3 days, although I think I’ll read it again, armed with more than just a rudimentary knowledge of physics. It certainly helps here, because, despite it being what I would call a brisk read, the author’s routine explications of his scientific research, as well as his inquisitions into theories of others physicists, past and present, were a challenge for this writer to fully, immediately comprehend, and often interfered with my ability to appreciate what is, at its core, the tale of a man’s drive to build the world’s first time machine, so that he can travel back in time to prevent his father’s death from a heart attack.
But maybe that’s ok. I don’t necessarily have to understand every single scientific formula, hypothesis and conclusion to appreciate the central story and themes; but I do think if I were a physicist, or had a relatively solid background in that specific science, my reading experience likely would have been superior.
Throughout the text, which spans about 50 years (from the 1950s to the early 21st century), I was most engaged when Mallett talks about his relationships – with his father, mother, siblings, other physicists and his romances – or, I suppose what I would call the more *human* elements of the story. But there’s actually not very much of that, seemingly written about, almost as if in passing, or as an afterthought, since the 200+ pages are saturated with the technical/scientific elements of the narrative – essentially the parts I had the least understanding and appreciation for. But that’s why, as I said earlier, I’d like to read it again, armed with more than just a rudimentary knowledge of physics.
He was clearly a man driven, with tunnel vision, on a mission to fulfill this singular goal he set out to accomplish when he was a pre-teen, right after the death of his father. And as expected, his unwavering commitment to his goal wasn’t always healthy – for him and those close to him.
Ronald Mallett is a black man, needless to say, but he doesn’t really devote any pages to discussing his experiences with related social constructs like race. He devotes few sentences to the racism and discrimination he faced growing up, both in the north and south USA, post WWII, through the fight for civil rights in the 60s, as one of the first black PhD physicists in this country, navigating his way from one campus to another, and one job to another, trying to find the perfect fit for his research.
In reading the book, I did expect him to eventually delve into the subject of racial attitudes during his ascendance, but he never quite does, instead choosing to focus almost solely on the subject of time travel. Maybe it’s just my own biases that are informing my need to have him discuss his experiences as a black man of his stature, especially given the periods in which he grew up and received the bulk of his education. Or it could just be that his intense, unwavering focus on his end goal made him oblivious of much of what was going on in the world around him at the time. Or it could also be rather he just accepted that the overt, unapologetic racism of the day was simply one of the valleys of life, but nothing that needed to consume his own life.
His education and his dream were primary – essentially his weapons of choice in the war against prejudice. Absolutely nothing was going to deter him from success!
It’s a book about one man’s life’s work and passion, chased vigorously, unwaveringly, at the expense of his social sanity. It’s not typical Hollywood sci-fi material – there aren’t any scenes that would require computer generated effects, no aliens, no interstellar explosions, no time machines, despite the film’s title. There are moments of reverie which Spike could have some fun with, wherein, Dr Mallett dreams about seeing his work realized, and utilizing it for the purpose that initially motivated him to dedicate his life to creating it. In short, there’s very little spectacle!
Needless to say, he doesn’t actually build a time machine, rather just simply lays down the groundwork for the potential creation of one, sometime in the future, once all the uncertainties of building such a thing have been sufficiently resolved.
How Spike Lee’s film adapt will handle the material is still very much a mystery (although maybe the project is dead to him right now). I think it could be a challenge if it’s a completely faithful adaptation, but I doubt that it will be. Spike/Ian will have to get creative, and squeeze as much life as they can out of the humanistic elements of the story, and find a way to balance the scientific, without allowing it to dominate as it does in the book.
Unless they opt to follow the same path that writer/director Shane Carruth took when he made his 2004 Sundance Film Festival Grand Prize winner, “Primer” – also a time travel film. I’ve watched “Primer” several times, but I still can’t say that I completely understand the theories and ideas that are introduced and that the starring characters constantly discuss with each other. The 79-minute film hits the ground running – no backstory, no footnotes. It’s as if Carruth is saying to the audience, “you either understand what we’re talking about or you don’t, but we’re not going to “dumb it down” by explaining everything to you… We’re scientists and this is how scientists interact with each other and their work.”
So, in essence, either you buy it, or you don’t. But yet, somehow, I’ve never been turned off by the fact that much of what is discussed is foreign to me, and instead find myself fascinated by it all.
So, I suppose Spike could implement a similar strategy. But I doubt it. It’s not really his style.
Denzel Washington (although he’s 60 now) could be a contender, if only because he and Spike have a working history that goes back over 20 years; so I can see Spike going with him again.