Back to IndieWire

Review: ‘Power Rangers’ Is a Mega-Budget Reboot That’s Embarrassed of the TV Show It’s Based On

For all of its surprising relevance, “Power Rangers” feels hopelessly lost in time.

"Power Rangers"

“Power Rangers”

It really isn’t that weird that someone spent $105 million on a “Power Rangers” movie in 2017. What’s weird is that someone spent $105 million on a “Power Rangers” movie in 2017, and then decided that it should open with a gag about a teenage boy inadvertently masturbating a bull.

Yes, we live in an an infantilizing age of blockbuster cinema that sustains itself by selling people overpriced echoes of the songs they sang as kids. Yes, Hollywood is growing desperate for previously established properties it can exhume, refurbish, and sell back to the public as mega-budget franchises with international appeal. And yes, the studios are starting to scrape the bottom of the barrel, throwing money at anything that boasts even the faintest glimmer of brand recognition (the next few months alone will see big screen versions of “CHiPS,” “Ghost in the Shell,” and “Baywatch”). But “Power Rangers,” which feels so distant from the zeitgeist that it seems like NASA should be forced to hold a press conference every time it comes into view, admittedly makes a certain amount of sense.

Moviegoers old enough to buy their own ticket may not know this, but “Mighty Morphin Power Rangers” — a kitschy, brilliantly resourceful kids TV series that debuted in 1993 by wrapping an original story about a fresh-faced team of American superheroes around the oodles of colorful, exaggeratedly dubbed battle footage that it borrowed from a popular Japanese show — is still on the air. And while the program’s current iteration probably doesn’t politicize this point, there’s no denying the timeliness of a saga about a multi-racial squad of high schoolers who can only achieve their true power and transform into a giant robot (Megazord!!) by “putting down their masks” and working together to defeat an ancient evil. And yet, for all of its surprising relevance, “Power Rangers” feels hopelessly lost in time. There is an audience for this movie, but this movie has no idea who that audience might be.

“Power Rangers” isn’t for adults, who might be hoping for a lovingly ironic approach in the tradition of “21 Jump Street.” It’s not for teens, who grew up with this stuff, and might enjoy seeing their childhood toys repurposed for a gritty reboot that flatters their maturing sensibilities. And it’s not for children, whose parents might let them watch the TV show on Saturday mornings, but may not understand why they’re supposed to laugh during the pre-credits scene in which a high school prank goes awry after a juvenile delinquent admits to mistaking a bull for a cow and yanking its dick until some “milk” came out.

READ MORE: Elizabeth Banks On Why She’s Not Directing “Pitch Perfect 3”

In fact, from the symphonic music that plays over the opening credits to the film’s glacially-paced origin story and the city-destroying robot fight with which it culminates, “Power Rangers” owes far more to the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the “Twilight” generation, and Michael Bay’s “Transformers” movies than it does its own source material. If not for a handful of scattered call-backs and an amusingly incongruous performance from Elizabeth Banks (who plays the evil Rita Repulsa with such go-for-broke glee that it feels like she’s fulfilling a Make-A-Wish request for a dying fanbase), it would seem as though this movie were embarrassed of its origins.

The basic gist is still the same, even if the new Power Rangers look more like “Riverdale” rejects than than they do the cherubic Disney Channel graduates who populated the original. After a brief, campy prologue that finds Repulsa fighting a dude named Zordon (Bryan Cranston, who has deep ties with the franchise) during the Cenozoic Era, we’re whisked back to the present, where a motley crew of beautiful teen screw-ups are about to meet in detention and form the weirdest Breakfast Club of all time.

Elizabeth Banks in Power Rangers

“Power Rangers”

Jason Scott (the mannequin-like Dacre Montgomery, who aspires to Charlie Hunnam’s level of lifelessness) is the local football hero who throws his future away when he gets involved in the aforementioned bovine incident. His reasons for wanting to strand a farm animal in the halls of his high school aren’t super clear, but they’re broadly of the James Van Der Beek “I don’t want your life” variety.

He’s joined by newly disenfranchised mean girl Kimberly Hart (compelling half-Indian actress Naomi Scott, destined for better things), quiet rebel Trini (Latina YouTube star Becky G), badass momma’s boy Zack (a charismatic 29-year-old Chinese-Canadian talent named Ludi Lin), and the savant-like Billy, who struggles with sarcasm but amiably self-identifies as being on the Autism spectrum. He’s played by RJ Cyler, who never reprises his famous “Me and Earl and the Dying Girl” catchphrase (“‘dem titties”), but does get to articulate his character’s non-neurotypical nature in a monologue about how difficult it would be to “cram a ton of crayons in a butt.”

In some respects, this is an admirably diverse group of characters, a fact that “Power Rangers” emphasizes from time to time, either by digging a bit deeper into their respective cultures or by having an alien machine size them up by exclaiming “Different color, different kids, different color kids!” In other respects, there are some glaring gaps in representation, and these omissions are made all the more pronounced by the film’s overt focus on inclusiveness. Maybe Muslim kids, Jewish kids, or anyone else who doesn’t see themselves on screen can hold out hope for the sequel — more likely, they’ll come to think of their absence as a blessing in disguise.

If this all sounds like a lot of liberal posturing, it’s not as if the movie gives you all that much else to think about. Silly as many of its details may be, “Power Rangers” adheres to the same tired structure as every other effects-driven story about unassuming people who inherit superhuman abilities, defeat the bad guy, and leave us with some canned voiceover about their future adventures. This one leads all five of its heroes to the same mine, where they discover a buried spaceship, become strong, make friends with a chatty robot named Alpha 5 (voiced by Bill Hader), and receive marching orders from Zordon, who is trapped inside the ship’s computer system or something. Meanwhile, the ghoulish Rita Repulsa is terrorizing the good people of Angel Grove and stealing their gold so she can rebuild her (ironically worthless) hench-golem for the film’s only big fight scene.

“Power Rangers”

It’s hard to remember exactly how John Gatin’s screenplay pads out the rest of the film’s 124-minute running time, but there are a ton of training montages, Rita murders a homeless guy for no particular reason, and at one point the Power Rangers are almost undone by a sexting scandal. At least director Dean Israelite — whose “Project Almanac” now seems like a dry run for this — is smart to spend plenty of time on Alpha 5; the robot minion doesn’t have a single clever line of dialogue, but it looks like scrap metal from the set of “Forbidden Planet” and moves with a visual ingenuity worthy of “Star Wars.”

Not that “Power Rangers” would have been improved by trying harder to ape ILM genius with CW talent. What this exasperatingly bland movie needed was more personality of its own — it needed to be made on a budget small enough to afford to fail even harder than it’s probably going to anyway. If not for Elizabeth Banks, some dinosaur-shaped mechs, and the fact that everyone keeps saying the word “Zordon,” this would hardly seem like a Power Rangers movie at all; even the iconic, color-coded spandex suits have been turned into hard plastic nonsense that looks so dumb and lifeless that Zack Snyder might as well steal it for “Justice League.”

The film is a blast during the few brief moments when it embraces the cartoon craziness that’s made the television show into such a cultural fixture, but it sheepishly backs away from every one of these giddy indulgences as if it’s afraid of getting caught with a hand in the cookie jar; why play the series’ unforgettable theme song (“Go Go, Power Rangers!”) if you’re going to cut it off after just a few bars? If only “Power Rangers” had the courage to put down its mask and work with its audience. It may not be possible to cram a ton of crayons in a butt, but that doesn’t mean we should settle for anonymous photocopies, instead.

Grade: C-

“Power Rangers” opens in theaters March 24.

Stay on top of the latest breaking film and TV news! Sign up for our Email Newsletters here.

This Article is related to: Film and tagged , ,


Comments

RRA

This looks like MAX STEEL 2.

    Warren D

    This wishes it was Max Steel 2. If it didn’t say Power Rangers on the tin, I wouldn’t have known it was meant to be a remake of the original series. This is a cheap Chinese knockoff of the show.

Ducky99

Saw it today om LA and was very entertaining.

Imran Hussain

Was I the only one who never saw a power ranger transform into the megazord always thought the zords formed megazord. Note the sarcasm

Ulysses J Smith

I cant take reviews or opinions to heart if either its gonna put down this movie because its too different from the original and i AM a superfan of the original or put it down because of expectations of it being some deep comic book movie like Logan. Reguardless, this movie WILL succeed because it seems it will out do and out perform tremendously the original movies and i think it will try to appeal to other fans and we will have to see if thats the case opening weekend and the week after. If the 1st power rangers movie back in 95 that was cheaply made can make $66,433,194 worldwide then this new one can surely make more because we need to remember that us in america are NOT the only ones who may or may not watch this.
Sorry for my grammar i had to rush writing this

    Ulysses J Smith

    I meant to say it seems that it will try to make new fans

    BC

    It’s not putting it down because it’s too different, it’s putting it down since this movie is ashamed to be associated with the original. In fact, it’s so ashamed, it has more relations to Twilight and resembles more Transformers than PR. In fact, this review surprised me by talking about the fact that PR is still going on today, and that there are teens who grew up on it that will probably want to watch this movie.

    The issue is that this movie doesn’t know its demographic, at least according to the review.

Khoi

In my opinion. Three words. This review sucks.

    BC

    Why? Because you disagree with an opinion on a film that isn’t even out yet?

S.Lucifernandez

“Spoiler Alert”…..Jerk..😂😂😂

MAI C.

I can’t take a review seriously if half of the reason why someone believe a movie is bad it’s because of it’s diversity.

    BC

    Diversity wasn’t an actual issue. The point of the whole “diversity” section of the review was that the PR film left with not much for the reviewer to think about. While it was a bit cringy when he just brought it out of nowhere, it is explained why he did it and showcases the fact that the PR movie did not have much to be thought about in the first place.

FITLBOX

I grew up with Power Rangers. Even then, I knew how campy it was. But I never wanted it back or Nolan-ized. Another waste of money and more memberberries.

FITLBOX

Also, the Power Rangers movie the review speaks of did exist in 1995. Had all the cheesy production values and bad acting of the show. Wasn’t a gem by any means, but fitting.

Ivan Orozco

This guy has not watched the recent interations of the series by that i mean the recent shows have learned to play at what they are and that is campy redubs (except for jungle fury) and re-tools of a japanese product and ive found these to be more enjoyable then the shows who took themselves seriously . Will i enjoy this movie who knows, but to say a movie isnt good because it lacks what detractors of the property found to be annoying . Its like wanting a Mustang with the engine of a Civic.

Ashley Larson

Audience: 32 year old female, 5 year old son, and we can’t wait until Friday!!

Cody

I never read reviews but im pumped about this movie. Who cares if the movie isn’t “diverse” or if it doesn’t live up to the original. People are going to watch it! Am I the only one who goes to the movies to see an “entertaining” movie???

Obinna o

I am sure the movie is fine . Fans of the original don’t want to see a remake of the campy 90s show. I know because I was a huge fan. We want to see exactly this… a more mature version of what we watched as kids. going by the source material this movie looks amazing. It seems to have been successful in taking what fanboys loved the most about power rangers, and balancing it out with 2017 expectations. Without even seeing this movie, and based on the source material, I can safely give this film a c+

the question

this would hardly seem like a Power Rangers movie at all; even the iconic, color-coded spandex suits have been turned into hard plastic nonsense that looks so dumb and lifeless that Zack Snyder might as well steal it for “Justice League….
With this comment it is clear what your opinion about justice league will be without even seeing it, what a great critic you are.

rick

So it’s exactly what Lionsgate has been aiming for. Using the Power Rangers brand name to create another teenage action YA film fair Divergent/Hunger Games/Maze Runner franchise with Power Rangers motifs sprinkled on top of it.

Ben

Zack Snyder’s superhero costumes are the most true to source, fantastically recreated movie costumes. Cheap shot.

    Zeriel

    @BEN If Zack Snyder’s costume designs are so great, why does Cyborg’s crotch look like Megatron’s face???

Uberto Monaldo

You can’t expect people that like Power Rangers to like a version that trying to be anything but Power Rangers. That’s the problem of most adaptations today: they are afraid of being like the original. It should have taken example from Beauty and the Beast who is marvellous, made an awesome box office hint and it’s just like the original

Daryl

i was so looking forward to this after seeing the original movie back in the day. all i have to say what a waste of time. power rangers only suit up for 15 mins if your lucky at the end of the movie. to much yapping not enough power rangers . if they want kids to watch this movie i fear it may not hold attention spans long enough if all they get is 15 or less minuets of rushed rangers and zord action. i hope they release the original movie in hd because that beats this movie hands down. campy or not. it had action , was a fun ride and most importantly had POWER RANGERS.

first movie i’ve seen ina log itme ive been disappointed with , its very forgettable i doubt it ill get many more sequels at this rate whether they planned it or not.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *